Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality4

We to solidify memory for unifying myself as justification to myself, try to write unconsciously, rather than dinky fact minuteness, we precede even not so uninteresting meetings as meaningful. It can apply the case of others’ impolite saying to me, even to it we try to permit others’ impoliteness in attitude or action. It is a merciful decision in the meaning of conscience or reason. But it is also based on a calculation to my fault case’s permission from others and it leads myself into mercy to others, then it would be Kant’s fundamental evil.
Then we have a chance to admit my trivial mistake or wink at others’ mistake as we deal with perception not to be moved so much minutely, in this meaning we can be not to proper if we apply it to Kant’s fundamental evil. Namely it’s our needed idleness as indispensable instinctive wisdom
But we at the same time of it need to charge ourselves in introspection as not philosophical ordinal meaning at the moment we face the important or grave decision
,regarding our habit as being ready to rewrite memory with cognition about fundamental evil. And we need to be aware of our emotional, calculative idleness exist deep inside our minds to be concerned with our assessment to others
Namely we have both the situation to be caught as serious or not so serious not to be memorized as dinky matter (positively we should forget), and its assessment has a relation to memory and experience, namely former chapter’s truth minutely.

Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality3

Of course we can say that love creates also hatred. Instinctively someone can evade holding hatred, probably he would be a good personality. But if he or she is so, one can evade harm originates in hatred with one’s wisdom, he or she wouldn’t be always affectionate. Of course good affectionate one can exist, if he or she shows affection, essentially one can be affectionate, he or she would be jealous too, then disappointment of anger would be bigger, inversely affectionate one can be awkward to evade risky situation generally, despite of it, being skilful to evade risks makes someone be a calculating person. But it is not so generalized truth.
Namely distortion to formal memory content or justification to misremember is caused from obedient mind to authority.
Then some decisive mind in hesitation which we should take to be continuous keeping company with someone or to cede its relation relies on trust to someone or affectionate emotion to him or her in assessing personality. Namely it’s cognition of human-relationship assessment and a decision.
Thereby we experience to get to be in rage according to grade of trust in meeting someone’s action and getting disillusioned, originally hatred robs us of our energy, the decision not to be enthusiastic to change a feeling into anger regarding it as not valuable with cool gaze. Its decision has an idea that to be to trustful isn’t profitable, we can say so, but at the same time of it, even the great personality would be conceited, we can be aware of it, and its decision has that meaning.
What I said now is so important. Because we often forget necessary truth, a dinky it discovered by us accidentally is regarded as so important by us, and we persist in it and after a few while, we get to be aware again of after all truth exists in another place. And still we are apt to hold blind trust to favorite persons and thereby we hate them after loving so much easily. But even if our anticipation is betrayed by them, holding detachment is the best cognition for all of us, because we aren’t be perfect entity and we mustn’t forget it

Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality2

But the decision not to make much of capricious action or performative declaration or action is at one meaning that we wink at a gap between action fact and real personality, in revel of perception surely we can regard it as positive abolishing. Namely for keeping unified personality we don’t doubt our capacity to rewrite memory as abolishing trivial things. It is very little evil as we try to call it a necessity evil. If its wisdom is eliminated, we would be in a trouble at our usual living. Why we do so is caused from that we need to see our habit as fundamentally object for keeping personality not minute assessment in the both meaning of toward myself, toward others It can be called a decision to assess personality in trust of human relation as social living. Namely we are not always composing others’ images along the reality, rather we often regard others’ shyness or hesitating attitude as bad will, necessarily we often misjudge others’ images as assessment.
Namely a person of threatening attitude is often one feels delicately not so evaluated or assessed as not so good talented or characterized as not so good from threatened one in fear to threatened one. Paraphrasing it unexpectedly other person we have a gap feeling to him or her could be analogous to ourselves. Therefore we are said to get mutual trust to others generally, not careful to dinky mistakes by others or caprice by others taking an important action object
Then to a person to take so impolite attitude to ourselves saying that once upon a time he or she was so good character person, if he or she is old, he or she gets to be older, judging so, we often assess him or her as senile dementia.
Therefore after seeing his or her changing, we can rely only on how we could love or being generous to him or her from that time on. Then a reason to say that personality as value is based on mutual realization between other person is that personality is the thing to be made by mutual love among mutual human-beings. Rewriting of memory is said to be a decision by love to repair dinky mistake or caprice by other person with cultivation of personality.

Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality1

Sydney Shoemaker said in his text “ Self Knowledge and Self Identity” that we can doubt that subject of memorized thought or experience is present subject of experience or not, but we can’t doubt that memorized thought or experience was those of myself, then person’s identity isn’t subject or identity of substance, duration of personality needs no substantial duration.
This means that subject self is so changeable, hasn’t been trusted by us, or disposition of substantial and biological facts are each different was created, we can say so, but according to my opinion, I have another idea except it.
It is next. Namely personality self is different from biological nor action fact, if we take it into consideration that self cognition is always open to the future, we can think that it shows that what we can judge with totality and what we feel ourselves as myself do never accord with each other, all are in hollow, and it shows also a relation to that hope in myself or expectation is always in gap between reality, as those fact a cognition to one other person is based on self tilth to all of cognition, but it isn’t merely a action fact accumulation but also a thing we can read with our subject. Namely personality is made from our realization to others made between ourselves and others, in it we can find out evaluation, judgment, appreciation exist. It’s a decision.
Then sometimes if we discover a gap between memorized thing and existing in reality, if we persist in we think of there’re different from talked matter by one personality and recorded thing and it’s mistake according to record’s rightness must be a truth, we clearly solidify personality self and judge miss record to its record and we try to keep our personality identity.
Namely we judge it’s top priority that keeping personality’s justice is more important than keeping trivial memorized matter and despite of that we are aware of self falsehood we rewrite memory. Of course dinky mistake guarding is in question.
Then judgment to precede that it should have been so rather than that it was so surely exists as authoritarian idea, and care to others. Therefore its difference or gap to record or memory despite of an opinion exists that its action or utterance contents was so really. The case we should gaze at straightly to its truth, but the case we should deal with compromising judgment resetting the truth also exists. A judgment self which decision is suitable is done in experiential judgment. Of course improper case and proper case both exist.
And its judgment relies on subjects of any personality. Dinky difference gets to be so bigger then some trouble between each human relation sometimes happens.
But important fact is that assessment to personality creates applicable or suitable action or language activity to personality in question. Namely even if we have a good impression to one personality, with some action facts we get to have some doubt to one, then we usually abolish former set assessment to oneself , we revise personal cognition. On the other hand of it, to reliable trustful other person, we even know not so good fact as acting or saying to him or her, we regard it as caprice, and keep up with former assessment, we often meet an opportunity of him or her effort to contact us fitting him or her to our judgment with replying our anticipation as assessment.
It can be applied in the case of mutual sympathy kept state, but sometimes the case with which evil taking advantage to our trust is evoked exists. And all of those cases aren’t in generalization because any time events are accidental
Namely assessment to personality is equal to decision of human relation or choosing object to contact as person. Then not so important person is the exceptional case that we can’t be denounced by others to be concerned with reason to make only ambiguous assessment as long as we say in public
And also if we discover extreme gap exists between action fact and personality assessment, it judger gets to be an object as not so evaluated nor denounced personality. Or actually very extreme case in question, we often even discover mental disease

Chapter25 Experience and Value(3)

Then for example novelists, Japanese them are assorted because the type to specialize Japanese as cultural characteristics of special faculty and the type even recognizing traditional spirit, more international vision is taken in them and pursuing universal story or theme, or composing phrase style anticipating the form to be translated or any other types exist with so deep river among them. Of course top revel writers have a talent to overcome each side difference. Namely various meaningful and much talented to activate own faculty is their characteristic.
Then as to be professional some have a custom to work in night, sleeping in daytime, its style of living is not concerned with creative talent or persuasion to readers. Then recently praise novelist as Akutagawa Praise businessman face and writer’s talent can be assimilated in one personality. It’s rare case, we can take him so. Thereby if one has so much talent to create a novel world, he or she has a permission to have a fault not to be able to wake up early, or not so goodly dressed, all those defects aren’t concerned with his or her true ability as writer.
At this meaning, recently happening event of entertainers’ stimulus abuse is not concerned with ability or their achievements, and the difference toward young generation people’s spirit and all of those are each different matter, we should be aware of it. Ordinal Japanese moral relies on the assimilation of usual living attitude as virtue and ability or talent to work with specialty as common sense of society.
By the way generally truly authentic person with an idea that human’s entity has inherently goodness are apt to take an attitude pretending bad guys skillfully. He or she has an emotion to dislike spots on human entity. He or she try to hide their true emotion not to be disliked by ordinal people. Namely he or she tries to play on the role of anti-hero or heroine, and outlaw.
But their pretension to be bad isn’t so natural and full of fraud or falsehood. But miserably those types of cases are many in our society as my impression.
Namely an attitude seen in elite class so-called cultural intelligent people gets to be assorted because we think already that value self should be owned by many people as common treasure and it cannot be grasped as one thing
But for each person hold an idea that it’s fraud that recognizing of values as assorted, it’s solely one. It’s necessity as long as we don’t lie to anybody. Despite of it, there’re so many values around our each individual life and some never admit my value, we can be aware of it as natural cognition, that’s all. 　
But rarely some are the existence to make us in trouble with vise, because of it we must to be careful to others being not to be apt to tell rapidly true mind as thought or anything. Namely we has an ability to guard own entity. Paraphrasing those, its self defense attitude to others is wisdom gotten only after experiments, we can define. And if we have synthesized thought form we are apt to take an attitude hiding its stance, its wisdom has gotten in our custom after experimenting, if value self can be composed by experience, at the matter of fact we can be aware that experience it self doesn’t include so much sympathies gotten by other person’s admission unexpectedly and it includes so much things gotten in myself only after a feeling nobody admit and only myself can admit and have a persistence to hold as treasure, then an emotion caused from the setback gotten after not to be admitted by others would work as main poll to consist inner value feeling through an experiments of us.

Chapter 25 Experience and Value(2)

As more interesting fact, we get to have something of general information about not professional fields. It’s common sense or current belief. They work as harm to self professional jobs or especial skill or ability, but it’s for us not so serious thing, not only but also they are cushion toward friends or colleagues as communication on human relationship for example concerned with pastime or hobby. They’re intellectual system on every single days of our life.
All those things are so light that we can use them to keep up with human relation and just because of those being not truth even half lie works as pastime or hobby conversation. As long as not concerned with public situation, or friends’ conversation.
For example for artists or scientists, creativity or invention or discovery is valuable for human future, despite of that truth, curiosity babies often hold on them even adult persons have, they work as harm to politics or region society community conversation. Namely strange element as characteristics of personality can be evaluated only in special fields, then all those talents are things have gap among general society as professional field faculty, we can realize so.
For example short track running athletics need precision time record but marathon runners don’t need not so strict or rigid time record. Difference two or three minutes are not to important in the condition of which marathon has on difference of climate condition or geographic condition, short track athletics usually have. We all even not professional persons can be aware of the characteristics difference between two types of sports.
Namely that judgment not professional persons have is common sense judgment world. That type of current belief is a little different skill from especial skill persons as professional. Namely usually older citizens or veteran persons as any professional fields in mentioned matters can have proper judgment.
According to that truth, usually all those faculty or ability is different from especial skills, general experienced knowledge are different quality from elite ability, of course exceptional cases exist. In spite of those, it’s never always that all those wisdom cannot be needed. Namely those need life experience, then every professional persons have each different knowledge but general knowledge except professional one surely rigidly exist, because we need to judge not professional matters around our living reality as must of society life keeping ability.

Chapter 25 Experience and Value(１)

To particularize something or evaluate it actually relies on usual experience. And also we produce each time judgment and difference exists between it and not so big concerns with our usual experience and memorization of impressive events. At the meaning toward general memory concern matters, signification of experience is big, that is necessary, also experience works as contribution to value vision.
But it gives us a curiosity that experience itself can be lead to a result as actions by vision toward value. But at the first step of our life, we can’t help but recognizing that experience composes value as a factor to lead that fact.
Namely in an accordance to language learning we step by step have a bud to consciousness toward value. It is made with an experience to be praised by others or denounced by them, and get to figure out that something should never be repeated again. (In that experience some young children get to have an action not to be recovered as their life security in social common sense.)
But because with those experience we own a particular paradigm as categorized vision in creative thought, necessarily we get to own intention to the future as action with those categories as method to correspond. And with a pile in that paradigm and experience’s repetition,our life itself can be composed in a carrier.

Chapter24 Value to Need Judgment Solidification and Consensus to Others②

Namely value self is the thing to be needed as finger in action or matter to awake us to the fact that truth is never like a absolute thing and not a omniscient matter. Paraphrasing it for that reason it should be consensus among myself and others not force. Namely in waiting for it subjectively, value is solidified judgment, it has a characteristics to be reserved as intention. Consensus among myself and others means always relative solidification. But of course in what value is value, it would be right and trustful, there’s also a role value to prevent us from believing in absolute truth easily with persisting in it’s never always not mistaken. Its truth includes even nature physic law, human supreme moral, or anything. Of course despite of all those facts, truth belongs to supreme standard, it’s never a wrong fact.
Namely to keep up with combination exists among several values as trustful and about absolute facts always we should be awoken that entity has a wrong thing, in that truth, we need a consensus to other people, with it, we could judge in right angle, in that standpoint value is needed by us. Then entity needs existing human-beings with a possibility to consider, namely only with a human-being entity could be composed, then an entity meant minimal could exist. Just for it, in absolute truth we need a consensus among others that even entity could go wrong, we need always consensus among others, in those action, value itself needs others’ consensus, its only a method to prevent value itself from go wrong.

Chapter24 Value to Need Judgment Solidification and Consensus to Others①

Here we have gotten a conclusion. It's that value is composed in a trial to solidify judgment and value solidification starts to need others' consensus necessarily. Value itself is the thing to be solidified at a meaning but it's never absolute and includes a possibility to be changed. Then for maintaining the value itself state we need a consensus to others and we are also needed by them. For being as value itself, we need a necessary procedure and we don't admit the things experienced a procedure. To agree with something self means to see some matters or some actions under a solidified value. What value has objectivity is for getting a result with a truth and universality. Then value isn’t a priori. It is the thing to be composed. The value as an action has virtue and characteristics to be shared can be thought as the thing to be universal with steady truth as characteristics.
But why we need to solidify the judgment is caused from that judgment is the thing to be reactive action at each moments as feedback and posture to any emergent situations. But at one meaning always we have an invitation toward a custom at no changeable situation necessarily. If at an invitation toward it, we need to compose the posture, it would be feedforward posture. Namely that we have another unchangeable situation except situations to need own posture ,it means to abolish not solidifying to every moments would be suitable, there we get to need solidified situation as value. According to it, judgment solidification with value is smoothly composed in solidification. And we can have a peace of mind with its selection to keep up with a solidified value, there are sometimes exceptional cases with trouble, namely two different type of situation always exist, the consensus to each different disposal. Namely truth teaches us that recognizing a suitable situation as solidified and evading the situations solidification works as an obstacle, having them as contradictious truths’ co-existence is our indispensable condition we should have.
Then value is always relative. It means not absolute. But despite of it, all of judgment shouldn’t be random absolutely, judgment is always the thing should be solidified. For it we need always consensus among any other persons, but at the time to decide we need always a space to change something toward solidified value. Value is surely the thing with universal with truth, but at the same time of it, because it includes a possibility to be changed, then it isn’t equal to truth. But it doesn’t mean any truth is complete as God like entity. Originally value itself is always needed to be changed as flexible thing, even the truth can be overturned with a space we can do it. It is a claim by value relativity.

Chapter23 Value and Fascination②

But its dual cognitions are mutually supported each other. When we take a matter and an action, they can be quested in their raison d'être both for myself or others in reason. After all when we say myself, we take others a premise, when we say others, we take them for myself. Then at some chances we can share only value, on the other hand, as concerned with fascination we take it as individual difference exists. Namely we think that every other person has both publicly evaluated values can be trusted and fascination can be interested in by myself.
Then when we have a fascination toward a matter or an action, always those are the objects can be understood only by myself, if its possibility is so higher, even minority, we need supporting members to help each other, if its possibility is so lower, we admit any majority mentality. To former, we try to find out fellows, because we cannot give up any minds to have a fascination to evaluated things, and to latter, we take them fascinating because they have been evaluated already. Then necessarily a relation between value and fascination in minor supporting spirit we seek our identity seeking minor supporters, at latter case, we think of myself to assimilate others’ opinion, namely in retrospective thinking we speculate either admit naturally an evaluated matters majority support, or try to find out other valuable matters, in doing so we build myself in a relation between self and others. Namely to realize inner mentality value and fascination are taken advantage of in our lives.
At the case of that value self has fascination, we a little take care of general others’ opinion, at the same time of it, take own feeling about myself in seeing myself assimilating other persons, if the case that we have a fascination making myself imagine its object often leads us to that we gat to know that its object be already evaluated by general people, inversely the case that we take something an action or a matter as so evaluated already but its object really nobody has evaluated still now, after a long time observation by myself, we get to know its object is just only the thing only myself has continued to evaluate.
Then even if something has been evaluated, we often cannot regard it as not so valuable, but on the other hand even the situation myself has found out its charm but others except me has never evaluated it still now is not so rare.
Former we have often a mind to protest general opinion as reputation to it being driven to authorized solidified it, and latter we would be driven to try to persuade anybody except myself as claim to others about its orthodoxy. Just because of for value, fascination works as an important role to admit it in my inner mind world, for fascinating something(includes entity) value would work as finger to keep up with egoism or self persistence to valuable things for myself

Chapter23 Value and Fascination①

Originally our ancestors produced currency to get something, it means that they recognized all of citizens had desire to survive as equal possession deserves needing currency. And whether value itself produced fascination, or fascination produced value would be a difficult question.
Namely an action, a thing, an existing thing all of them have raison d'etre, then
as actions or as things all of them have been grasped from ancient ages. Value itself is a value ‘cos it has raison d'etre, whether we grasp something because it has value, therefore we take its fascination or it has fascination, therefore we take its value, it’s the question we should address.
When we regard something valuable, in our cognition, we take it should be better than others or other method or action shouldn’t be taken as properness. Namely we take it as adjustable and reasonable and having raison d'etre, and meaningful. Just because of its judgment we can take its thing or action valuable. On the other hand, because we think it has meaning and fascinating, we think it has value. Of course its fascination is assorted because it has difference exists between public consensus to value vision and extremely private judgment of myself as individual person. Then we can be lead to the result that fascination has a characteristics that fascination be composed with naming valuable, at the same time of it, value be composed with judgment to fascinating thing.
In naming value, the fact that other person except myself should be adjoined each other. We believe already established value. Against it, when we give a value to fascinating thing here is subjective mind to persuade others. Then former action is authoritarian cognition is added. But latter action is, in action to give it an authority, authoritarian, but its thing isn’t already given any authority by others, it is never named valuable in trust to others. It is faithful to own sensibility.