Chapter24 Value to Need Judgment Solidification and Consensus to Others①

Here we have gotten a conclusion. It's that value is composed in a trial to solidify judgment and value solidification starts to need others' consensus necessarily. Value itself is the thing to be solidified at a meaning but it's never absolute and includes a possibility to be changed. Then for maintaining the value itself state we need a consensus to others and we are also needed by them. For being as value itself, we need a necessary procedure and we don't admit the things experienced a procedure. To agree with something self means to see some matters or some actions under a solidified value. What value has objectivity is for getting a result with a truth and universality. Then value isn’t a priori. It is the thing to be composed. The value as an action has virtue and characteristics to be shared can be thought as the thing to be universal with steady truth as characteristics.
But why we need to solidify the judgment is caused from that judgment is the thing to be reactive action at each moments as feedback and posture to any emergent situations. But at one meaning always we have an invitation toward a custom at no changeable situation necessarily. If at an invitation toward it, we need to compose the posture, it would be feedforward posture. Namely that we have another unchangeable situation except situations to need own posture ,it means to abolish not solidifying to every moments would be suitable, there we get to need solidified situation as value. According to it, judgment solidification with value is smoothly composed in solidification. And we can have a peace of mind with its selection to keep up with a solidified value, there are sometimes exceptional cases with trouble, namely two different type of situation always exist, the consensus to each different disposal. Namely truth teaches us that recognizing a suitable situation as solidified and evading the situations solidification works as an obstacle, having them as contradictious truths’ co-existence is our indispensable condition we should have.
Then value is always relative. It means not absolute. But despite of it, all of judgment shouldn’t be random absolutely, judgment is always the thing should be solidified. For it we need always consensus among any other persons, but at the time to decide we need always a space to change something toward solidified value. Value is surely the thing with universal with truth, but at the same time of it, because it includes a possibility to be changed, then it isn’t equal to truth. But it doesn’t mean any truth is complete as God like entity. Originally value itself is always needed to be changed as flexible thing, even the truth can be overturned with a space we can do it. It is a claim by value relativity.