Chapter23 Value and Fascination①

Originally our ancestors produced currency to get something, it means that they recognized all of citizens had desire to survive as equal possession deserves needing currency. And whether value itself produced fascination, or fascination produced value would be a difficult question.
Namely an action, a thing, an existing thing all of them have raison d'etre, then
as actions or as things all of them have been grasped from ancient ages. Value itself is a value ‘cos it has raison d'etre, whether we grasp something because it has value, therefore we take its fascination or it has fascination, therefore we take its value, it’s the question we should address.
When we regard something valuable, in our cognition, we take it should be better than others or other method or action shouldn’t be taken as properness. Namely we take it as adjustable and reasonable and having raison d'etre, and meaningful. Just because of its judgment we can take its thing or action valuable. On the other hand, because we think it has meaning and fascinating, we think it has value. Of course its fascination is assorted because it has difference exists between public consensus to value vision and extremely private judgment of myself as individual person. Then we can be lead to the result that fascination has a characteristics that fascination be composed with naming valuable, at the same time of it, value be composed with judgment to fascinating thing.
In naming value, the fact that other person except myself should be adjoined each other. We believe already established value. Against it, when we give a value to fascinating thing here is subjective mind to persuade others. Then former action is authoritarian cognition is added. But latter action is, in action to give it an authority, authoritarian, but its thing isn’t already given any authority by others, it is never named valuable in trust to others. It is faithful to own sensibility.