Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality1

Sydney Shoemaker said in his text “ Self Knowledge and Self Identity” that we can doubt that subject of memorized thought or experience is present subject of experience or not, but we can’t doubt that memorized thought or experience was those of myself, then person’s identity isn’t subject or identity of substance, duration of personality needs no substantial duration.
This means that subject self is so changeable, hasn’t been trusted by us, or disposition of substantial and biological facts are each different was created, we can say so, but according to my opinion, I have another idea except it.
It is next. Namely personality self is different from biological nor action fact, if we take it into consideration that self cognition is always open to the future, we can think that it shows that what we can judge with totality and what we feel ourselves as myself do never accord with each other, all are in hollow, and it shows also a relation to that hope in myself or expectation is always in gap between reality, as those fact a cognition to one other person is based on self tilth to all of cognition, but it isn’t merely a action fact accumulation but also a thing we can read with our subject. Namely personality is made from our realization to others made between ourselves and others, in it we can find out evaluation, judgment, appreciation exist. It’s a decision.
Then sometimes if we discover a gap between memorized thing and existing in reality, if we persist in we think of there’re different from talked matter by one personality and recorded thing and it’s mistake according to record’s rightness must be a truth, we clearly solidify personality self and judge miss record to its record and we try to keep our personality identity.
Namely we judge it’s top priority that keeping personality’s justice is more important than keeping trivial memorized matter and despite of that we are aware of self falsehood we rewrite memory. Of course dinky mistake guarding is in question.
Then judgment to precede that it should have been so rather than that it was so surely exists as authoritarian idea, and care to others. Therefore its difference or gap to record or memory despite of an opinion exists that its action or utterance contents was so really. The case we should gaze at straightly to its truth, but the case we should deal with compromising judgment resetting the truth also exists. A judgment self which decision is suitable is done in experiential judgment. Of course improper case and proper case both exist.
And its judgment relies on subjects of any personality. Dinky difference gets to be so bigger then some trouble between each human relation sometimes happens.
But important fact is that assessment to personality creates applicable or suitable action or language activity to personality in question. Namely even if we have a good impression to one personality, with some action facts we get to have some doubt to one, then we usually abolish former set assessment to oneself , we revise personal cognition. On the other hand of it, to reliable trustful other person, we even know not so good fact as acting or saying to him or her, we regard it as caprice, and keep up with former assessment, we often meet an opportunity of him or her effort to contact us fitting him or her to our judgment with replying our anticipation as assessment.
It can be applied in the case of mutual sympathy kept state, but sometimes the case with which evil taking advantage to our trust is evoked exists. And all of those cases aren’t in generalization because any time events are accidental
Namely assessment to personality is equal to decision of human relation or choosing object to contact as person. Then not so important person is the exceptional case that we can’t be denounced by others to be concerned with reason to make only ambiguous assessment as long as we say in public
And also if we discover extreme gap exists between action fact and personality assessment, it judger gets to be an object as not so evaluated nor denounced personality. Or actually very extreme case in question, we often even discover mental disease