Chapter10, What is myself?

In the reality that actions have a relation to others, we in the meaning of myself or others have known the fate actions can be grasped only by ethics. But it's too fast to sift to essential proposition straightly what ethics is. Then we must quest what myself is.
About this problem, "What is myself?" by Sumio Hamada Psychoanalyst in Japan is the book which narrates so many things about it, and we can say that in front of others we face an active and passive relation but at a time to be alone we have no relation of it, but Dr.Hamada said that also at a time to be alone we face a reality that we hold a relation to others. That is right. Namely myself has a faculty that if it has no others in front of him or her, instead of others he or she makes others in myself. Paraphrasing it, we live as myself holding essential others.
When we think of ethical problems or value vision, we have other choice but touching this problem. That truth claims that we have a need to think of the contradiction that we have private value and public value as a discrimination vision. Why do we think with distinctive vision between privacy and publicity.
Surely solipsism says that for us the world opens through ourselves' problems or conditions. But if we think so alone, to think so is universal thinking anybody hold, that point of view must appear in front of us. Rather solipsism has a premise that it needs others' existence. Namely at the moment to say that we cannot grasp all of world's matters with our eyes or our minds, at the matter of fact, a faculty to say so self means that it is a public problem, not private one, and we ourselves know that so really. Then myself is a capacity to make others at the time to hold no real others subjectively, at the same time of it, to merely be myself as solipsism talks to others, namely thinking that this only is myself or saying so to others already in the ability to talk something or thinking of it, the world is not the thing that we only can see with our eyes, essentially the seen world is universal property to everybody as the necessity truth. At the matter of fact to think so self proves that we ourselves all is not so different to all of others except myself.
Paraphrasing it, myself is from my existence only usual others as same as for usual others.
If we think I am the special one, the imagination that other guys breath oxygen but I breath CO2 is meaningless. We see that rapidly. Surely myself destiny is sole thing. But if all of others live with same idea, surely my destiny is so general thing. Namely in the meaning of anybody not the one who isn’t not sole existence. And just because of it, inversely myself as to be sole is rather general thing for all of us. It is the false that I only is seen as general existence but anybody. Namely to be aware of it is just to acquire myself, we can say so.