Chapter 11 Valuable ethics and Ethical Value

According to I mentioned former chapter, when we think of meaning of ethics, I defined that a capacity to hold a thought that others are also live as individual particular living is just a myself, then to think of myself as a special existence but to think of it would be a general fact for all of us is an ethical imagination.
And thinking so, and cooperating others, concede others something, making a harmony to others, responding others’ requests, backing away from others, denying others’ requests, refusing others claims, to all of those selves, to quest a justice of those performance is also an ethical quest. Namely in all of cases of each question, we can evaluate as a ethical value.
On the other hand, to quest question self is truly a meaningful quest or not is possible. For example in judging each cases on retrospective consciousness or properness vision as it is a good thing to do, it is not so proper thing to do, it was so retrospective action to review as thing to be reformed, to quest to quest so ethically is effective or not is different in each cases. Then at a time to quest, because a thought that only to quest isn’t enough ethical good action would be composed, naturally valuable ethics or ethical value would be also composed.
Namely a question self about ethics is effective and not effective at each cases, a case that to quest so is not so meaningful also would exist. According it, also a case that ethical valuable thing self is valuable exists, but inversely just because with ethical value a case that itself would be meaningless also would exist.
Really those cases exist usually. When we see a comedy variety TV programs, and laughing at a joke by comedians, to analyze a meaning of or criticize a gag which comedians did in that program laughing it would not be a constructive for the family with friendly mood. Laughing itself has a meaning, and to analyze or criticize a properness of laughing is mistook action at that time. And when conversation partners say to us as joking and realizing it, to ask a partners what he or she said with a gesture not to realize that joke would be a judgment that lacks a meaning of moralistic idea that to listen to others’ saying and understanding others ideas’ meaning. When our conversation partners say a joke, we should be in a position to listen to a joke, it would be different from a situation to listen to serious talks, we should absorb true mind partners to say a joke. Of course jokes is not universal at each cases, a situation with serious mood not fit for a joke also exists.
At an aspect of narrating it, in properness to judge a joking action in that situation a case not to judge a moralistic criticism would be positioned as a properness in family, a judgment only to laugh a gag by talent in TV programs not showing a gesture to realize a meaning of laugh, self is a moralistic value, but then to judge a case to laugh at a comedy variety or joke someone to make him or her to laugh is meaningful or not self would be able to be judged as judgment self justice. “ Laughing at that moment would be moralistic or to judge its laugh is proper, then ethically valuable” its saying can be consisted. Though at a case a man judge a saying by others to himself as bad meaning despite of that it is not so difficult contents, if a partner to demand an advise say that to joke you so by that person is not so proper for you and himself as so childish namely not moralistic but to anxious it so heavily self or judging it with moralistic vision is not so meaningful, he or she would judge that he or she said to a man can be judged as moralistic standard as ethical value, but a decision self that judgment is so serious in mind could be judged as valuable ethics.
To say that it is meaningless to judge it so seriously would be paraphrased to say that it isn’t a valuable ethics , namely it’s valueless ethics.