Value at the first time to be judged as valueless tries to protest already evaluated value , because it keeps up with doing so, it holds so steady intention. But it gets an admission from society, it gets conservative attitude and gets to be precipitated into authoritarianism. It’s a destiny. Value has characteristics to deny as to be seen genuine since the moment to be evaluated by authority. A quality of being moved would be genuine unless it gets no reputation from outside as it is fine as a prejudice. According to that truth, value has a destiny to get itself into guard posing since the moment it has valuable signification as value for the person as authorized as VIP as creator of valuable things or performer of valuable actions. Then if Sumo wrestlers has only all of a win game as Sumo tournament since first day, they at the day before last day of the tournament or after ten games, he usually lose the game because their intention is bound by a consciousness to win as word of victory. They lose a game by a defeating of a wrestler weaker than them, despite of the fact that if they hasn’t so steady that intention, they never defeated by them.
If a writer publishes a novel or something after so evaluated masterpieces of novel or something, he has so difficult situation at the release without an impact by before success. A success of newly release of novel or something getting rid of before masterpiece’s impact or consciousness of that one is so rare. But if a writer has an effort to writing a newly trail without consciousness before success, and release a different type of masterpiece without a trial to be evaluated by accustomed pattern, he or she would succeed at least of the vision not to rely on past success. He or she has a future possibility at this point. Namely a braveness to create a masterpiece not to be evaluated by anyone gives writers or creators a future possibility to do the release of their works at a proof that he or she has a steady policy or stance not to be in a guard position to protest the conservative attitude.
All of actions has characteristics to claim a justice of action should be done Even if a writer or creator has a consciousness that evaluated works has a consciousness to be evaluated, therefore he or she try not to be evaluated by authority, if he or she has no standpoint that actions intend to no evaluation from anybody only has a value, he or she would absolutely plunged into the same perversion as authoritarianism at the moment to think so. Namely it also has an intention to others’ eyes as his or her consciousness ( at this case usually he or she has a thought that next generation people or strangers would evaluate his or her works ).
Then all of actions at the limit of acting has an intention to need to be evaluated, they has a destiny not to be able to escape that way.
Namely a decadence parousia’s awareness is needed for all of actions of ourselves. Why it would be so? Because all of actions effectively has characteristics to involve any other persons and self-actions already at the moment to act would be involved on cause and effect relation. It has no way except it. At this meaning all of actions would be in a destiny as a category value-no value.
It is the same of Sisyphus’s rock conveying. Thereby action has latently a driven power as evil in destined meaning as recognizing a significant action intends to authority’s reputation or ignoring not evaluated actions truly valuable.
Paraphrasing it, all of actions people do at the characteristics to be in self and others relation has a destiny not to escape from value-not value category or goodness-evil category as reputation from outside except myself, and defining an action as actions has a destiny to drive us into be in an evil and goodness, therefore we can say that action-self has to be in a rule of moralistic vision, we can position all of actions into a ethics.
登録:
コメントの投稿 (Atom)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿