Chapter 8 Admitting a Value and Needing a Moving emotion driven②

Then necessarily an accident produces a genius. If we say that that genius as saying is valuable and treasure of human-beings, value is always the thing that we can define that an idea to lead us into a trial making an accident a necessity
after something happened. Namely value isn't a naming to already evaluated thing but one to be defined as it is a value with an indicating produced thing in the focused situation.
And in the things we evaluate some special thing as human-beings we start calling them genius. But we don't be moved by that person, but his or her achievement or works or masterpieces. After all we don't be moved by a charm of his or her characteristics. The object we can define a value produces or a power of value produces something would make us to think that the person to produce those are the extraordinary as their images. It is rather near to the thing to make us to feel that their efforts are the action to barren effects or a trial and error to meaningless things. Despite of its truth, we never evaluate them since their efforts are evaluated, if the moment comes to evaluate their efforts as being proclaimed that authorized person gives us an evaluation to their efforts, we inversely evaluate their efforts after the moment. Namely before the moment we belong to the mass not to be able to see through truly evaluated matters as junk group but after the moment we try to change ourselves as evaluators to their efforts. But these actions of ourselves prove that we are all merely the commonplace people not to be able to see through valuable matters, but we don't want to be aware of its fact.
Then a first condition of mechanism of value is on the standpoint that we need a authority that never evaluate a newly trial as the attitude authority usually takes, in the situation that a incapacity that leads no effect to evaluated truly valuable things is needed to find out a truly evaluated matters as element to compose value.
Namely truly valuable matters have a destiny to protest against all of authorities and not to admit all of already evaluated matters or authorities as endowment.
Namely already evaluated matters also couldn't deprived of their value after newly evaluated matters appear, a world bristles with various values and rather values collide with each other. It is their fate. But in the situation we do it as a real could help but admitting it is so, if a value could never deprived of their evaluation by another values, we can help but admitting a relative logic. At the same time of it, we can recognize that the claim by a value is not only the absolute opinion but also a value exists as harm to other values as the meaning of one value. But for one value self is merely the supreme value, never admit other values, it can never evaluate a relative logic.
Then a value for one person can be a choice among bristling existent values. If he or she choose one value, he or she never overturn that decision. At this fact he rather choose a way to exclude any other values he or she didn't choose.
If he or she evaluates any other values, at this moment he or she precipitates himself or herself into a falsehood to him or her. At this moment he or she loses a true value we can say only so. But we can observe so many cases like it, despite of that fact we all want to think that only myself don't belong to those group.
For one person at one moment, there's only a value, he or she can get one value. But he or she lives not for one moment, but for all moments. And moments sift from here to there, from present to past, from future to present. Namely a quality as being moved by something or evaluated in myself can change and sift always. A recognition to all sifts reality is just proof of not relativists of ourselves and a real that in spite of that we misjudge all, we think that our judgment is absolutely misjudged ones.