Existent Value and Word Value2

But when we think of word value, we are apt to take a jugment along with the present situation, a properness of jugment, we can say so especially with a respect to a technical realization. Namely on the contrary, as if we hold a carefulness to word said to others, others often judge its saying not so appropriate in that situation as TPO. Then word value isn't a inner motivation. Rather it could be judged with effective word properness. In that meaning we need an ideal toward a choice of a person to do something for example act as a politician in front of audience as speech act, to move them or a group to belong to. We need an ideal performance to them.　On the other hand as concerned with action category, we need of course a technic of action, but unexpectedly rather after a long period we regard an attitude ignoring a speedy or techical or esthetical image as a tiny element to decide a value of action. Namely we respect a fact to act, do not respect a technic even if at the first time its action could get any good reputation.
It shows a truth except a sport's technic, usual our action could be evaluated by a standard along with a realization as a fact, or a meaning explanation or an effect by that action (Even sports rely on a restless effort or exercise and beauty of action is merely an effect of those).
But words don't stand upon that standard, then if words selves were not charming to persuade anyone, we don't evaluate those words. We need a standard to judge words with an esthetic beauty to read, and we regard the words without beauty as meaningless. It's ordinal jugment for us. We regard the meaning of words as so important.