Value as Love・Love and Marriage4

Namely a value vision not to recognize any person with a different choice and method of composing life would necessarily mono-value holders' possession, and on the other hand a value vision to recognize others' vision or opinions belongs to value relativists' possession.
But both sides are the same as sadism, relativist' attitude is apt to be scarcely meet any interference from other thinking persons, thereby it has some tendency to hold a curiosity toward inverse position thoughts as light sadism to anybody but themselves. For example once upon a time in U.K. any white women had no shamefulness to Japanese guys to be naked, it shows us complete no-interference attitude to do us some shock. It has an emotion as pity to others a little, but so many parts are occupied by normal attitude to others taking no-interference contact, not so altruistic.
Then it shows a stance to recognize other thinking knowing it's so separated ideas includes a light sadism in mind function.
Namely we have a decision to admit despite of a difference between knowing it's right thing as it's the same quality, knowing it's also right thing as it's not the same quality. It could be paraphrase to an inverse content that later jugment cannot be said as respect. Then former one also belongs to the type to get a relief feeling or the jugment to favorite thing for them to take former one not to harm a conscience. Then respect as an emotion can be defined as knowing some objects are superior but not to get to love immediately, on one case, it's not the same type to our types. Namely it originates a feeling not to get to be a favorite but to get to approve with a reason, or a feeling to be able to judge a good thing in a critical attitude. It includes a type of the things we cannot help but admitting it. Then it is simply duty-practice character. It leads a facts that we cannot permit their thing to lead a bad effect on a critical jugment since we're not liking it but making ourselves to be persuaded as it is right in duty-practice. Because if it was a favorite thing, we are in the mood to pardon any failure of it (people, systems, tools or any others). A crisis of favorite thing is the chance to love it more for us. Of course we cannot easily to shelter it with supporting emotion if it was a public thing. But in spite of that fact we'd like to pardon a severe inquiry to it at least on our emotion.
Then we can paraphrase it that we hold the emotion not to pardon the superior thing getting worse in its quality as we cannot love it but cannot help but evaluating reluctantly. This can be characterized by a jugment to it as a revenge to it, but it's servile feeling.
In a word, respectful emotion can be categorized to two completely different types, to double a favorite feeling to respect and merely to hold a duty-bound reluctantly.