Value as Love・Love and Marriage3

But the thinking that to love only with an impulsive motivation is risky not to recognize, because it's an unstable factor to break a peace of family or a balance of spirit for the person to pile those elements. This means the value sense of economy and time. On the other hand a thinking that it's risky for me, but a value sense to admit a love emotion only with an impulsive motivation is one of the choice exist. He probably has escaped all those emotions, but he can admit other thoughts. Because those are other persons’ ideas. This means Ⅱchoice. For him to avoid an unstable life-driven impulsive love feeling is Ⅰchoice as value vision. It's applicable to inverse case. Namely it's to realize getting checkered love affair to cause any trouble but to admit other choice by other person to escape any those emotions as gambling sensation to keep up with stable state of family. He takes separation of his choice and other guys' choice. It's a value vision. Both two sides are similar to each other, because that's myself is myself and others are others. Also if not to admit other persons' ideas absoluteｌy, both side namely to admit only a stable choice and to admit only a adventuresome trial is the same types of category as value vision.
Namely to choose the stable family relies on a marriage or a freeness of love emotion and the pureness of a motivation, it causes the question that which is right to admit only same choice to myself or to admit other ideas also the same as myself. If other guys have an inverse ideas but it's ok or not ok is a question. Marriage surely has a character to save a compromise or a principle to consist of stable state of livings. Thereby at one meaning to admit other guys' choice self is love. Latter choice is neighborhood mutual love, it's a value to recognize each others' difference, love value.