Instinctive Jugment to Discremiate Value 2

Namely we regard value as mutually co-exist in mind or kill each other and what to be thought as a serious matter and what to judged as those two different things.
That discrimination self has no hesitation as long as we can judge those easily with a hope to make our lives so elegant. But we hove sometimes a serious aspect after a sudden change in our lives. The moment we have to decide converging every value visions must come to us. Namely we have a feeling that killing two each other things as value hold a characteristics as fundamental evil. But that distress is possible thing to come, but to converge every value visions is often needed when we must hold a decision of intentional mind, or we take an action. Originally converging those things is on the moment to have a steady decision, and shift it to an action. And mind state in that moment is covered by discriminative and excusive and filled with objects to be excluded. Then we usually must be careful not to be regretful at that decision. To get a lost thing once back is so difficult. Especially it is applicable to a human relation. A human relation to be judged as a bad decision to be cut and good one to be cut also. Even the things to be judged a good decision to be cut have the different types of the cases both to miss or not. The case to miss something can be positioned as what to dismiss easily, not showing any intention to separate. If we have a lost human relation to miss but with a regret, it would do a mind to miss a bitter mind. Namely a mind of regret cannot sweep any impoliteness to others or a lack of kindness to others. Therefore in the case of a lost human relation with no regret, if it is natural separation, it wouldn't do us any shame in mind. Rather in the case to hold a possibility to be restored, it ought to be an interim separation.