Instinctive Jugment to Discriminate Vlue3

But unexpectedly those two matters cannot be separated easily. Namely the trouble as living belongs to that we have a traffic between two matters as the things we can regard that we say a farewell as good and as bad to be regretful. This truth depends on that value self have a traffic of two different recognition. The difference exists between jugment as to be good toward a valuable thing and as to be good against an already taken value with a decision to say goodbye, and to be good toward those different things' co-existence and to be good against it. It is perfectly applicable to ①and ②, also Ⅰand Ⅱ. This categorization is made by my arbitrariness, but everybody probably imagine so, aren't they? And we judge a standard to make co-existence with a convergence to separated values and a co-existence of separated values as co-existing thing they cannot forbid each other. It's an instinctive jugment. Then on the contrary, if it wasn't an instinctive one, in the case of possibility to reviewed as reasonable jugment, it was full of a self- consciousness and a decision to approach a world, on the contrary, if it was thought as disgusting to quest it, we judge it is okay to let it be in the instinctive jugment.