Value as Love・Love and Marriage2

Then happiness awareness self could be supposed with the jugment that it's good to keep mental satisfactions unless we don't disturb other persons' happiness feeling as value vision.
But it could be realized unless we don't suffer from mental trauma losing partners' affection to us. Namely it has a natural premise to be able to recover a mental energy. But if we contact the emotion to love anybody often would invite us a situation to be a stalker both from male to female, from female to male. Even also we judge that neutral emotion to somebody is not so nutritious to make up an evolution of our spirits. If we hold trivial affection to somebody is not so hard to do. Then a function or an application to love is to say that we judge with gambling sensation as valuable feeling.
But if it is a sole platonic relation, it would be so serious, if we hold the physical relation, an aspect of love affair would be changed naturally. Even also if we have it with the situation only one side is married or two sides are married with a different spouse. If we have love feeling, also if it was only a curiosity to have a excitement of loving emotional game, we needn't a family state or a income state from a loving partner as conditions to choose.
But if the person was with a conservative thought to marriage to hold stableness of life, its jugment to marry someone would be supported by an another jugment a loving emotion is harmful as to be unstable on gambling sensation. Namely to admit a value of loving emotion as mind nutrition and to recognize to marry someone as a way to make our lives stable are in the relation of conflict. And some judge its conflict as time separation as period of pre-marriage, period of marriage, and period of already married. But the people having the family unless they break the order of peace and stableness of family, would admit some loving emotion as not so incapable emotion. But on the other side some with a thought that it's badly commonplace to marriage someone just keep their stableness of living would exist. Those people probably are with the feeling to make a motivation to love someone precede the effect of loving emotion as nonprofit raison d'etre. Those two antagonized thinking wouldn't cross each other eternally.
But it relies on the jugment on the future of loving emotion's choice dare to break a family peace as good or not so according to the effect of loving emotion, if we are in not appropriate relationship, after going on that relation breaking pre-family, we have a justification to do so, that's a rationalization to our emotion　"That's not inappropriate jugment" People love to spoil the past or clear the past trouble, and justify the misjudgment.