For example, a problem of economics. Namely management(though management is on the business administration), around economics policy economics stands on the principle as validity of action, we can say so. But philosophy thinks the real not only from the outside but also from inner decision mind structure. Then instinctive jugment to be acted to a good result belongs the case of a practice under the faithfulness to a principle of economics. It is applicable not only to a nation policy but also the measure to purchase commodity as a choice of content or the price.
But on the other hand to validity of action, value of action self namely the standard of what actions to choose according to a difference of situation or a wisdom of evasion of not appropriate actions, the assumption to the effect of taking inappropriate actions, all of those need a philosophic deliberation. But instinctive jugment is applicable to the case of not reasonable actions, on the other hand of it, reasonable reference including a question about the validity of action is also an instinctive action, we can define. Namely a trial self to control instinct is also an instinctive jugment. On this meaning, regarding to refer validity of action named economics as inner mind value jugment with a philosophic deliberation is also an instinct, we can define also.
2009年9月30日水曜日
2009年9月29日火曜日
Instinctive Jugment to Discriminate Vlue3
But unexpectedly those two matters cannot be separated easily. Namely the trouble as living belongs to that we have a traffic between two matters as the things we can regard that we say a farewell as good and as bad to be regretful. This truth depends on that value self have a traffic of two different recognition. The difference exists between jugment as to be good toward a valuable thing and as to be good against an already taken value with a decision to say goodbye, and to be good toward those different things' co-existence and to be good against it. It is perfectly applicable to ①and ②, also Ⅰand Ⅱ. This categorization is made by my arbitrariness, but everybody probably imagine so, aren't they? And we judge a standard to make co-existence with a convergence to separated values and a co-existence of separated values as co-existing thing they cannot forbid each other. It's an instinctive jugment. Then on the contrary, if it wasn't an instinctive one, in the case of possibility to reviewed as reasonable jugment, it was full of a self- consciousness and a decision to approach a world, on the contrary, if it was thought as disgusting to quest it, we judge it is okay to let it be in the instinctive jugment.
2009年9月27日日曜日
Instinctive Jugment to Discremiate Value 2
Namely we regard value as mutually co-exist in mind or kill each other and what to be thought as a serious matter and what to judged as those two different things.
That discrimination self has no hesitation as long as we can judge those easily with a hope to make our lives so elegant. But we hove sometimes a serious aspect after a sudden change in our lives. The moment we have to decide converging every value visions must come to us. Namely we have a feeling that killing two each other things as value hold a characteristics as fundamental evil. But that distress is possible thing to come, but to converge every value visions is often needed when we must hold a decision of intentional mind, or we take an action. Originally converging those things is on the moment to have a steady decision, and shift it to an action. And mind state in that moment is covered by discriminative and excusive and filled with objects to be excluded. Then we usually must be careful not to be regretful at that decision. To get a lost thing once back is so difficult. Especially it is applicable to a human relation. A human relation to be judged as a bad decision to be cut and good one to be cut also. Even the things to be judged a good decision to be cut have the different types of the cases both to miss or not. The case to miss something can be positioned as what to dismiss easily, not showing any intention to separate. If we have a lost human relation to miss but with a regret, it would do a mind to miss a bitter mind. Namely a mind of regret cannot sweep any impoliteness to others or a lack of kindness to others. Therefore in the case of a lost human relation with no regret, if it is natural separation, it wouldn't do us any shame in mind. Rather in the case to hold a possibility to be restored, it ought to be an interim separation.
That discrimination self has no hesitation as long as we can judge those easily with a hope to make our lives so elegant. But we hove sometimes a serious aspect after a sudden change in our lives. The moment we have to decide converging every value visions must come to us. Namely we have a feeling that killing two each other things as value hold a characteristics as fundamental evil. But that distress is possible thing to come, but to converge every value visions is often needed when we must hold a decision of intentional mind, or we take an action. Originally converging those things is on the moment to have a steady decision, and shift it to an action. And mind state in that moment is covered by discriminative and excusive and filled with objects to be excluded. Then we usually must be careful not to be regretful at that decision. To get a lost thing once back is so difficult. Especially it is applicable to a human relation. A human relation to be judged as a bad decision to be cut and good one to be cut also. Even the things to be judged a good decision to be cut have the different types of the cases both to miss or not. The case to miss something can be positioned as what to dismiss easily, not showing any intention to separate. If we have a lost human relation to miss but with a regret, it would do a mind to miss a bitter mind. Namely a mind of regret cannot sweep any impoliteness to others or a lack of kindness to others. Therefore in the case of a lost human relation with no regret, if it is natural separation, it wouldn't do us any shame in mind. Rather in the case to hold a possibility to be restored, it ought to be an interim separation.
2009年9月24日木曜日
Chapter4,Instinctive Jugment to Discremiate Value 1
We ought to have experienced to hold a dual between responsible ethical jugment about reasonable loving emotion or a marriage or aim to regard others' vision with fairness and favorite vision without moral jugment. Thereby these two things make a dual in a meaning but we have a discriminative jugment toward those two. Namely in an explanation with ① necessarily it becomes a reasonable decision to others with fairness vision, in an explanation with ② it intends to a moved emotion with a relief or a leisure or a method for a change in holidays with relaxed feeling. Tiredness of wife and husband relation makes them intentionally suggest a trip to memorable places on wedding anniversary from one to one or from each other. It is ②, it should be Ⅰ, emotionally it includes ②, we can judge so. To appreciate suspense movies or horror movies in a holiday afternoons belongs to ②, and Ⅰ, it is a selection to be moved being relaxed.
2009年9月21日月曜日
Value as Love・Love and Marriage7
According to that truth, in the case talking about love or marriage, if it was added a self-falsehood, those talks are jointed with responsible ethics. Namely we take a jugment not to divorce so easily or not to take a cold attitude to the partners we once loved, all those examples are the proof that all those performances are responsible ethical mind function.
But moving emotion is so often capricious. If it was a grave matter, except the case, for example an encounter with an action or masterpiece to choose or change our profession, because it is so capricious that we can enjoy it. Therefore the co-existence of gravity and caprice around the moving emotions has a significant message, I think.
But moving emotion is so often capricious. If it was a grave matter, except the case, for example an encounter with an action or masterpiece to choose or change our profession, because it is so capricious that we can enjoy it. Therefore the co-existence of gravity and caprice around the moving emotions has a significant message, I think.
2009年9月19日土曜日
Value as Love・ Love and Marriage6
Then respect as mind function has some essence of a sadism to abandon easily the partner to betray our anticipation as an insurance because it originates a mind of decision stands on a fairness to kill the favor.
But it's different from its fact and essence of moving mind made in a reading of Les Misérables with an essence of ourselves not to pardon a theft but to move in front of the circumstance of Jean Valjean with a sympathy, despite of that to a person with no sympathy but also with no discrimination, we don't take any rescue and attitude to join him or her, and sheltering him or her from his or her passion. We never have a will to help him or her.
Because it's difference to that in the case of the essence of moving emotion to heroes and heroines has a root of empathy just because the case of fictitious characters, if those cases has been adopted to the real, we take an attitude to the persons applicable to heroes and heroines a coldly. And in moving a dramas we're aware those mentality. And even in the case not dramas but nonfiction novels, the moving sympathy toward described contents on the real happening matters, the choice of an action of ourselves and moving emotions separates each other, no so, more separated those has a result to make us to move toward , namely we move the matter as we cannot help and rescue from a trouble or passion knowing a disability to do so. Namely moving emotion holds an essence to includes a coldness of our minds and cruelty to all sufferers. When we can move with our watching to the dramas, we don't exclude that separation, but at the case of real love or affection, at least making the exception of separating or divorcing as an action choice, we ought to try to find out a compromise possibility to two things of a favor and an evaluation.
But it's different from its fact and essence of moving mind made in a reading of Les Misérables with an essence of ourselves not to pardon a theft but to move in front of the circumstance of Jean Valjean with a sympathy, despite of that to a person with no sympathy but also with no discrimination, we don't take any rescue and attitude to join him or her, and sheltering him or her from his or her passion. We never have a will to help him or her.
Because it's difference to that in the case of the essence of moving emotion to heroes and heroines has a root of empathy just because the case of fictitious characters, if those cases has been adopted to the real, we take an attitude to the persons applicable to heroes and heroines a coldly. And in moving a dramas we're aware those mentality. And even in the case not dramas but nonfiction novels, the moving sympathy toward described contents on the real happening matters, the choice of an action of ourselves and moving emotions separates each other, no so, more separated those has a result to make us to move toward , namely we move the matter as we cannot help and rescue from a trouble or passion knowing a disability to do so. Namely moving emotion holds an essence to includes a coldness of our minds and cruelty to all sufferers. When we can move with our watching to the dramas, we don't exclude that separation, but at the case of real love or affection, at least making the exception of separating or divorcing as an action choice, we ought to try to find out a compromise possibility to two things of a favor and an evaluation.
2009年9月17日木曜日
Value as Love・ Love and Marriage5
We regard an attitude according to the difference to others as a gifted person of the same profession to myself with a difference of age, for example same old and younger. Of course eve if we don't criminate anyone with the difference of age, mentally its difference is not so small, you know. Love is the matter that we naturally love the partner and we can hold a feeling of an overlap with favor to love.
It could be adopted to the case of an affections matter between male and female, for instance an attitude in marriage life, couldn't it?
Namely love value consists in a jugment toward mind of the each different cases spouse choice or merely friends choice, because we need an overlap toward a marriage life in love and favor, but we needn't an overlap toward a friends' choice. Because we judge a truth that an overlap in love and favor is everyday matter in our social livings. Therefore we want an overlap at least a spouse choice. But in the case to choose normal friends or colleagues around us, we take a
jugment making fairness as the top priority. Sole exception is in the marriage lives when we discover the spouse character we've never read before marriage.
Consequently, in the case without an overlap in love and favor, we're apt to admit a partner with reasonable jugment. But necessarily the attitude to respect a partner holds a character to cease a respectful mind if a partner was precipitated into a situation which we cannot respect him or her. A decisive feeling surely exist in our minds. Thereby in a mind of an overlap-realized in respect and favor toward partners, we would be disappointed to the failure to continue a respectful actions in a moral or a conscience by a partners rather than not overlapped case.
More to love, more to be a favor, Less to be disappointed or be angry in reversal effect.
Then necessarily love value has a trend to be biased to favorite feeling, but ideally an overlap is the best for us, I think. And at the beginning days of loving emotion, we have more favor, but after a long process, we are aware of the importance of evaluation to partners because we've got to be aware of their faults or shortcomings. Namely we know a compromise to others as a partner. That example of the best one is marriage partner as a spouse.
It could be adopted to the case of an affections matter between male and female, for instance an attitude in marriage life, couldn't it?
Namely love value consists in a jugment toward mind of the each different cases spouse choice or merely friends choice, because we need an overlap toward a marriage life in love and favor, but we needn't an overlap toward a friends' choice. Because we judge a truth that an overlap in love and favor is everyday matter in our social livings. Therefore we want an overlap at least a spouse choice. But in the case to choose normal friends or colleagues around us, we take a
jugment making fairness as the top priority. Sole exception is in the marriage lives when we discover the spouse character we've never read before marriage.
Consequently, in the case without an overlap in love and favor, we're apt to admit a partner with reasonable jugment. But necessarily the attitude to respect a partner holds a character to cease a respectful mind if a partner was precipitated into a situation which we cannot respect him or her. A decisive feeling surely exist in our minds. Thereby in a mind of an overlap-realized in respect and favor toward partners, we would be disappointed to the failure to continue a respectful actions in a moral or a conscience by a partners rather than not overlapped case.
More to love, more to be a favor, Less to be disappointed or be angry in reversal effect.
Then necessarily love value has a trend to be biased to favorite feeling, but ideally an overlap is the best for us, I think. And at the beginning days of loving emotion, we have more favor, but after a long process, we are aware of the importance of evaluation to partners because we've got to be aware of their faults or shortcomings. Namely we know a compromise to others as a partner. That example of the best one is marriage partner as a spouse.
2009年9月16日水曜日
Value as Love・Love and Marriage4
Namely a value vision not to recognize any person with a different choice and method of composing life would necessarily mono-value holders' possession, and on the other hand a value vision to recognize others' vision or opinions belongs to value relativists' possession.
But both sides are the same as sadism, relativist' attitude is apt to be scarcely meet any interference from other thinking persons, thereby it has some tendency to hold a curiosity toward inverse position thoughts as light sadism to anybody but themselves. For example once upon a time in U.K. any white women had no shamefulness to Japanese guys to be naked, it shows us complete no-interference attitude to do us some shock. It has an emotion as pity to others a little, but so many parts are occupied by normal attitude to others taking no-interference contact, not so altruistic.
Then it shows a stance to recognize other thinking knowing it's so separated ideas includes a light sadism in mind function.
Namely we have a decision to admit despite of a difference between knowing it's right thing as it's the same quality, knowing it's also right thing as it's not the same quality. It could be paraphrase to an inverse content that later jugment cannot be said as respect. Then former one also belongs to the type to get a relief feeling or the jugment to favorite thing for them to take former one not to harm a conscience. Then respect as an emotion can be defined as knowing some objects are superior but not to get to love immediately, on one case, it's not the same type to our types. Namely it originates a feeling not to get to be a favorite but to get to approve with a reason, or a feeling to be able to judge a good thing in a critical attitude. It includes a type of the things we cannot help but admitting it. Then it is simply duty-practice character. It leads a facts that we cannot permit their thing to lead a bad effect on a critical jugment since we're not liking it but making ourselves to be persuaded as it is right in duty-practice. Because if it was a favorite thing, we are in the mood to pardon any failure of it (people, systems, tools or any others). A crisis of favorite thing is the chance to love it more for us. Of course we cannot easily to shelter it with supporting emotion if it was a public thing. But in spite of that fact we'd like to pardon a severe inquiry to it at least on our emotion.
Then we can paraphrase it that we hold the emotion not to pardon the superior thing getting worse in its quality as we cannot love it but cannot help but evaluating reluctantly. This can be characterized by a jugment to it as a revenge to it, but it's servile feeling.
In a word, respectful emotion can be categorized to two completely different types, to double a favorite feeling to respect and merely to hold a duty-bound reluctantly.
But both sides are the same as sadism, relativist' attitude is apt to be scarcely meet any interference from other thinking persons, thereby it has some tendency to hold a curiosity toward inverse position thoughts as light sadism to anybody but themselves. For example once upon a time in U.K. any white women had no shamefulness to Japanese guys to be naked, it shows us complete no-interference attitude to do us some shock. It has an emotion as pity to others a little, but so many parts are occupied by normal attitude to others taking no-interference contact, not so altruistic.
Then it shows a stance to recognize other thinking knowing it's so separated ideas includes a light sadism in mind function.
Namely we have a decision to admit despite of a difference between knowing it's right thing as it's the same quality, knowing it's also right thing as it's not the same quality. It could be paraphrase to an inverse content that later jugment cannot be said as respect. Then former one also belongs to the type to get a relief feeling or the jugment to favorite thing for them to take former one not to harm a conscience. Then respect as an emotion can be defined as knowing some objects are superior but not to get to love immediately, on one case, it's not the same type to our types. Namely it originates a feeling not to get to be a favorite but to get to approve with a reason, or a feeling to be able to judge a good thing in a critical attitude. It includes a type of the things we cannot help but admitting it. Then it is simply duty-practice character. It leads a facts that we cannot permit their thing to lead a bad effect on a critical jugment since we're not liking it but making ourselves to be persuaded as it is right in duty-practice. Because if it was a favorite thing, we are in the mood to pardon any failure of it (people, systems, tools or any others). A crisis of favorite thing is the chance to love it more for us. Of course we cannot easily to shelter it with supporting emotion if it was a public thing. But in spite of that fact we'd like to pardon a severe inquiry to it at least on our emotion.
Then we can paraphrase it that we hold the emotion not to pardon the superior thing getting worse in its quality as we cannot love it but cannot help but evaluating reluctantly. This can be characterized by a jugment to it as a revenge to it, but it's servile feeling.
In a word, respectful emotion can be categorized to two completely different types, to double a favorite feeling to respect and merely to hold a duty-bound reluctantly.
2009年9月15日火曜日
Value as Love・Love and Marriage3
But the thinking that to love only with an impulsive motivation is risky not to recognize, because it's an unstable factor to break a peace of family or a balance of spirit for the person to pile those elements. This means the value sense of economy and time. On the other hand a thinking that it's risky for me, but a value sense to admit a love emotion only with an impulsive motivation is one of the choice exist. He probably has escaped all those emotions, but he can admit other thoughts. Because those are other persons’ ideas. This means Ⅱchoice. For him to avoid an unstable life-driven impulsive love feeling is Ⅰchoice as value vision. It's applicable to inverse case. Namely it's to realize getting checkered love affair to cause any trouble but to admit other choice by other person to escape any those emotions as gambling sensation to keep up with stable state of family. He takes separation of his choice and other guys' choice. It's a value vision. Both two sides are similar to each other, because that's myself is myself and others are others. Also if not to admit other persons' ideas absoluteｌy, both side namely to admit only a stable choice and to admit only a adventuresome trial is the same types of category as value vision.
Namely to choose the stable family relies on a marriage or a freeness of love emotion and the pureness of a motivation, it causes the question that which is right to admit only same choice to myself or to admit other ideas also the same as myself. If other guys have an inverse ideas but it's ok or not ok is a question. Marriage surely has a character to save a compromise or a principle to consist of stable state of livings. Thereby at one meaning to admit other guys' choice self is love. Latter choice is neighborhood mutual love, it's a value to recognize each others' difference, love value.
Namely to choose the stable family relies on a marriage or a freeness of love emotion and the pureness of a motivation, it causes the question that which is right to admit only same choice to myself or to admit other ideas also the same as myself. If other guys have an inverse ideas but it's ok or not ok is a question. Marriage surely has a character to save a compromise or a principle to consist of stable state of livings. Thereby at one meaning to admit other guys' choice self is love. Latter choice is neighborhood mutual love, it's a value to recognize each others' difference, love value.
2009年9月13日日曜日
Value as Love・Love and Marriage2
Then happiness awareness self could be supposed with the jugment that it's good to keep mental satisfactions unless we don't disturb other persons' happiness feeling as value vision.
But it could be realized unless we don't suffer from mental trauma losing partners' affection to us. Namely it has a natural premise to be able to recover a mental energy. But if we contact the emotion to love anybody often would invite us a situation to be a stalker both from male to female, from female to male. Even also we judge that neutral emotion to somebody is not so nutritious to make up an evolution of our spirits. If we hold trivial affection to somebody is not so hard to do. Then a function or an application to love is to say that we judge with gambling sensation as valuable feeling.
But if it is a sole platonic relation, it would be so serious, if we hold the physical relation, an aspect of love affair would be changed naturally. Even also if we have it with the situation only one side is married or two sides are married with a different spouse. If we have love feeling, also if it was only a curiosity to have a excitement of loving emotional game, we needn't a family state or a income state from a loving partner as conditions to choose.
But if the person was with a conservative thought to marriage to hold stableness of life, its jugment to marry someone would be supported by an another jugment a loving emotion is harmful as to be unstable on gambling sensation. Namely to admit a value of loving emotion as mind nutrition and to recognize to marry someone as a way to make our lives stable are in the relation of conflict. And some judge its conflict as time separation as period of pre-marriage, period of marriage, and period of already married. But the people having the family unless they break the order of peace and stableness of family, would admit some loving emotion as not so incapable emotion. But on the other side some with a thought that it's badly commonplace to marriage someone just keep their stableness of living would exist. Those people probably are with the feeling to make a motivation to love someone precede the effect of loving emotion as nonprofit raison d'etre. Those two antagonized thinking wouldn't cross each other eternally.
But it relies on the jugment on the future of loving emotion's choice dare to break a family peace as good or not so according to the effect of loving emotion, if we are in not appropriate relationship, after going on that relation breaking pre-family, we have a justification to do so, that's a rationalization to our emotion "That's not inappropriate jugment" People love to spoil the past or clear the past trouble, and justify the misjudgment.
But it could be realized unless we don't suffer from mental trauma losing partners' affection to us. Namely it has a natural premise to be able to recover a mental energy. But if we contact the emotion to love anybody often would invite us a situation to be a stalker both from male to female, from female to male. Even also we judge that neutral emotion to somebody is not so nutritious to make up an evolution of our spirits. If we hold trivial affection to somebody is not so hard to do. Then a function or an application to love is to say that we judge with gambling sensation as valuable feeling.
But if it is a sole platonic relation, it would be so serious, if we hold the physical relation, an aspect of love affair would be changed naturally. Even also if we have it with the situation only one side is married or two sides are married with a different spouse. If we have love feeling, also if it was only a curiosity to have a excitement of loving emotional game, we needn't a family state or a income state from a loving partner as conditions to choose.
But if the person was with a conservative thought to marriage to hold stableness of life, its jugment to marry someone would be supported by an another jugment a loving emotion is harmful as to be unstable on gambling sensation. Namely to admit a value of loving emotion as mind nutrition and to recognize to marry someone as a way to make our lives stable are in the relation of conflict. And some judge its conflict as time separation as period of pre-marriage, period of marriage, and period of already married. But the people having the family unless they break the order of peace and stableness of family, would admit some loving emotion as not so incapable emotion. But on the other side some with a thought that it's badly commonplace to marriage someone just keep their stableness of living would exist. Those people probably are with the feeling to make a motivation to love someone precede the effect of loving emotion as nonprofit raison d'etre. Those two antagonized thinking wouldn't cross each other eternally.
But it relies on the jugment on the future of loving emotion's choice dare to break a family peace as good or not so according to the effect of loving emotion, if we are in not appropriate relationship, after going on that relation breaking pre-family, we have a justification to do so, that's a rationalization to our emotion "That's not inappropriate jugment" People love to spoil the past or clear the past trouble, and justify the misjudgment.
2009年9月12日土曜日
Chapter3,Value as Love・Love and Marriage
You say that to love helps to develop a human scale as mental quality. But we think also as ordinary people that stable income and stable family is different from the value of loving. Of course we are not always to judge the marriage lives valuable to do us a happy emotion or a moisture. But obviously loving makes a unconcern to loving as frigidness activate to the state to satisfy our emotion vividness, but if we misjudge the way to go, we would suffer from injury
we've not expected, and give the people around us to be concerned loving, that's a common sense to understand for all of us.
On the other way, to love someone only in our mind not to tell her or him would give to loving one a accomplishment feeling insofar as I cannot evoke unpleasant feeling from someone, it's a ordinary recognition we usually have.
Then an emotion to love, which a awareness to be happy as valuable thinking would hold an unstableness insofar as we cannot evoke unpleasant feeling from someone to love with a return of mental satisfaction, is valuable we judge. But it's applicable to the case we don't suffer from trauma originates in a trial to love someone. That is a thought on the premise that we can recover our mental energy after losing love to someone. But also love emotion often evoke a stalking action both action by male person to female one and female person to male ones, as inescapable situation. Adding also, neutral feeling to love isn't the matter what we regard as valuable thing to evolve our mind nutrition. Because a feeling to like someone is an everyday emotion. Then gambling sensation to anticipate a romantic adventure is what we regard as panacea to all of love affair , we can say so.
we've not expected, and give the people around us to be concerned loving, that's a common sense to understand for all of us.
On the other way, to love someone only in our mind not to tell her or him would give to loving one a accomplishment feeling insofar as I cannot evoke unpleasant feeling from someone, it's a ordinary recognition we usually have.
Then an emotion to love, which a awareness to be happy as valuable thinking would hold an unstableness insofar as we cannot evoke unpleasant feeling from someone to love with a return of mental satisfaction, is valuable we judge. But it's applicable to the case we don't suffer from trauma originates in a trial to love someone. That is a thought on the premise that we can recover our mental energy after losing love to someone. But also love emotion often evoke a stalking action both action by male person to female one and female person to male ones, as inescapable situation. Adding also, neutral feeling to love isn't the matter what we regard as valuable thing to evolve our mind nutrition. Because a feeling to like someone is an everyday emotion. Then gambling sensation to anticipate a romantic adventure is what we regard as panacea to all of love affair , we can say so.
2009年9月9日水曜日
Value includes Evil 5
It's applicable to politicians. An existence like this killer is not so rare in any societies. The man as good to every people doesn't exist. If that case exists, this killer must commit a suicide.
But even if he did so, every killing case by him was demerit to both sides, then if he tries to be good to every side, at this point he would be no good to both side. Also his suicide would give both sides not so small damages changing the situation to hold merit by his action. After all, both sides would have a damage, and both sides would get a merit to avoid damages originates in not knowing his true aspect, it's plus minus zero.
Namely every people would be in that situation. According to that truth, heroes and heroines acting in dramas suffering from any agonies makes a decision of any same side supporters. At the view of this truth, they aren't so good, on the contrary, they are pain in the neck of the society. But we know their true aspect and we have a strong emotion to isolated situation of them. It indicates the fact that we are sadistic that we appreciate those dramas as moving ones. It leads to the truth an emotion to be moved is not good. According to that, an emotion to be moved includes a sadistic character, and in front of a serendipity as brain neuro- science , we recognize that value recognize evils. That's truth.
If we have a vision that thinking it is not so bad, it would absolutely be none but a falsehood to ourselves. If you discover the pain in the neck to suffer from agony, you would absolutely rescue that person form their troubles, because of self-defense. Namely the fact that we know that we cannot rescue them from anything triggers our habit to be moved by dramas with heroes and heroines to act seriously and actively. "Oh miserable”, “Oh pitiful and poor heroes and heroines!" Nietzsche probably smiles bitterly seeing we say evils have a value to the brain through the experience to be moved in watching the dramas.
At this standpoint, we would be awaken that value utilize the function of evils in the time we regard the evils a value. <>
But even if he did so, every killing case by him was demerit to both sides, then if he tries to be good to every side, at this point he would be no good to both side. Also his suicide would give both sides not so small damages changing the situation to hold merit by his action. After all, both sides would have a damage, and both sides would get a merit to avoid damages originates in not knowing his true aspect, it's plus minus zero.
Namely every people would be in that situation. According to that truth, heroes and heroines acting in dramas suffering from any agonies makes a decision of any same side supporters. At the view of this truth, they aren't so good, on the contrary, they are pain in the neck of the society. But we know their true aspect and we have a strong emotion to isolated situation of them. It indicates the fact that we are sadistic that we appreciate those dramas as moving ones. It leads to the truth an emotion to be moved is not good. According to that, an emotion to be moved includes a sadistic character, and in front of a serendipity as brain neuro- science , we recognize that value recognize evils. That's truth.
If we have a vision that thinking it is not so bad, it would absolutely be none but a falsehood to ourselves. If you discover the pain in the neck to suffer from agony, you would absolutely rescue that person form their troubles, because of self-defense. Namely the fact that we know that we cannot rescue them from anything triggers our habit to be moved by dramas with heroes and heroines to act seriously and actively. "Oh miserable”, “Oh pitiful and poor heroes and heroines!" Nietzsche probably smiles bitterly seeing we say evils have a value to the brain through the experience to be moved in watching the dramas.
At this standpoint, we would be awaken that value utilize the function of evils in the time we regard the evils a value. <>
2009年9月7日月曜日
Value includes Evil 4
Namely value has a trend to be conveyed with intuitive jugments, then it has a character to make us to misjudge. (on a view of Ⅱjugment)
But on the long term vision, the case that we experience that rather the matter we regard as valuable with our first impression would be right is often. We say "Don't judge a man by his appearance, at the same time we also say "Seeing is believing". Which is right, that is case by case, we can say only so.
Therefore evils is what we think as no value on our intuition, if we rethink carefully, even those are the existence like heals to make raison d'être of heroes or heroines clear, it's philosophical jugment, we can say that those have a steady status as niche. Namely unexpectedly rather than a simple good or value, evils as value jugment hold a steady raison d'être as an another folder.
We suppose the existence of professional killer employed by two gangsters' syndicates antagonizing each other. Of course they don't know his existence as double employed by themselves. He got the news from two syndicates that the other side has a good skilful killer
to attack our side, then he was ordered to kill him. Namely he was ordered by two syndicates to kill himself. At that situation, what should he do ever?
But on the long term vision, the case that we experience that rather the matter we regard as valuable with our first impression would be right is often. We say "Don't judge a man by his appearance, at the same time we also say "Seeing is believing". Which is right, that is case by case, we can say only so.
Therefore evils is what we think as no value on our intuition, if we rethink carefully, even those are the existence like heals to make raison d'être of heroes or heroines clear, it's philosophical jugment, we can say that those have a steady status as niche. Namely unexpectedly rather than a simple good or value, evils as value jugment hold a steady raison d'être as an another folder.
We suppose the existence of professional killer employed by two gangsters' syndicates antagonizing each other. Of course they don't know his existence as double employed by themselves. He got the news from two syndicates that the other side has a good skilful killer
to attack our side, then he was ordered to kill him. Namely he was ordered by two syndicates to kill himself. At that situation, what should he do ever?
2009年9月3日木曜日
Value includes Evil 3
Foils and heals are forced to participate in some projects to make actors or actresses starring in movies or any media outstanding and active than any rolls. On this premise any roll players try to hold some individual device. By and large we regard good looking and faces to give us a good impression as the most important factor to choose in any rolls, adding also with habit not judgeing a personality indwells to anyone. We give good looking guys and fellows to hold a face to give us a good impression a roll fit for themselves, if they are the stars, we give them a roll to act as heroes or heroines with a good screen play to be ordered by our desire to watch dramas dramatically to move us as appreciators or audience. This truth show an example to us with Paul McCartney or John Francis Anthony Pastorius III s' base play as master technician of beauty exists in base playing orijinally to even win a lead guitarist, despite of all those the case to have base player as a starring part doesn't exist.
But value is apt to claim recklessly, in the band without good base player, they try to seek out a good player, but that existence to seek after would be a ②'s synthetic value, it wouldn't be①analytic value. If we paraphrase those, on the logical vision of rationalism, or a jugment through male sex persons' brain tendency as systematic disposal intention, base player could be a hero with Ⅱselection, but with Ⅰselection we are apt to get, because we have a tendency to discriminate a spotlighted characters for example lead guitarists, we wouldn't select the heals or foils as heroes, then neither do base players as foils. Their existence and raison d'être of their selection of heals or foils is critical jugment belongs to a very sophisticated revel, its action doesn't appear as immediate jugment with affection to their existence. That truth could be proved no cases to make base players heroes in the band.
But value is apt to claim recklessly, in the band without good base player, they try to seek out a good player, but that existence to seek after would be a ②'s synthetic value, it wouldn't be①analytic value. If we paraphrase those, on the logical vision of rationalism, or a jugment through male sex persons' brain tendency as systematic disposal intention, base player could be a hero with Ⅱselection, but with Ⅰselection we are apt to get, because we have a tendency to discriminate a spotlighted characters for example lead guitarists, we wouldn't select the heals or foils as heroes, then neither do base players as foils. Their existence and raison d'être of their selection of heals or foils is critical jugment belongs to a very sophisticated revel, its action doesn't appear as immediate jugment with affection to their existence. That truth could be proved no cases to make base players heroes in the band.
登録:
コメント (Atom)
