Then to hold an opinion as the way to live concerned with lust , to know a truth that to hold excessive it must cause an effect that drives us into a disillusion teaches us to keep suppressed desires and try not to hold a little lust for not dissatisfying and also making not any persistent allurement to others and also doing so without any pride to others and showing no that attitude to others does us minimal moralistic order as ethical rule, but in other standpoint to compose a life with this ideology or principle means that it has no honesty like the woman I narrated as my younger days memory, at one meaning of ethics it’s right but at one meaning of emotion it’s so cold because hiding all honest feelings and that fact means an evil held by that person.(evil held only by smart person) According to that fact, to responsibly right would be so cold on the view of emotional ethics, inversely to be emotionally right would be irresponsibly an evil, but to others as emotional contacts so proper and humanistic with warm emotion and also on the relationship of others it would be honest and humanistic, then on here we have contradictory conflict performed by different both sides of values. Therefore we can judge that complete evils include goodness in the characteristic and neither complete evils nor complete goodness exist and ethical perfectly goodness doesn’t exist, as it would be only an illusion.
Values hold an evil on the other side as its element, and the side of evil for our side holds absolutely ethical justice, we can say so. To be ethical is another name of to be incomplete on the view of to be ethical, to be humanistic means none but to receive both goodness and evil, they’re the truth.
2009年11月21日土曜日
Chapter17 To be Ethical is an Idea toward To be Humanistic④
At one meaning I can judge now that woman to make me in annoy not to have my desire fulfilled by denial to the sex with her was so snobby and try to sell her virgin as only arm for teasing male sex person with a device to make her value as the object to have a sexual intercourse and therefore a pursuer to honest life of herself. Namely that type of person has so steady value vision as to pursue their happiness and pleasant feeling is the best way to keep their lives valuable. She really said to me “ To hold women needs an economic power.” And she negatives to my seducement to sexual intercourse but she at the same time of it tried to stop any seducement to other girls but her. She showed me a lingering attachment. Namely she tried to the different sex person to have some desire to have a sexual intercourse to her bound as stoicism but suspend my desire of sex teasing me. She has a good steadily solid guard instinct not to be utilized as sexual desire. Namely as a security she made her hidden power to utilize different sex person to get money when a male sex person has so much money to squeeze and have a little chance to do male sex person a body as a characteristic as native prostitute. A fact that men and women equity is the value for human-beings but really a type of native prostitute are so many and they are hidden in the mass of normal women in the society. As the old days they ware in the society of professional prostitution world. They hide their true mind in the mass and pretend to be normal women with normal profession as usual male sex person hold. If all of prostitution was inhibited by the law, necessarily women have a truly powerful guard instinct of themselves in their mind.
Then inversely there aren’t any restraint or suppressing powers or virtue of stoicism. Without any stoicism they’re so honest so much. If the woman were with a steady power not to be utilized as cheap sexual tool by male sex person, she was a type to evade any naïve attitudes to mean guys not to be a type to show any longings to good looking male sex persons without any guards and being utilized as sexual tools, but that will is so honest. We can say so. Then the case of that type of guarding myself woman has also a right to abandon all of steady security and guarding instinct. But I cannot see trough all of women which type of the woman suppressive type of sexual actions or not. Spiritually not guarding instinct women to give their body easily has to be a type suppressive, but they are not suppressive in the body revel. Inversely physical pleasure is the object for clever women to reserve in the future pleasance or happiness, and women to do so is suppressive in the body revel.
But as concerned with love affection there’s an idea that love emotion is an illusion therefore not to need greedily is valuable judgment, namely its attitude is neither no actions to get any motions to get a different sex person nor not to be utilized so easily.
Then inversely there aren’t any restraint or suppressing powers or virtue of stoicism. Without any stoicism they’re so honest so much. If the woman were with a steady power not to be utilized as cheap sexual tool by male sex person, she was a type to evade any naïve attitudes to mean guys not to be a type to show any longings to good looking male sex persons without any guards and being utilized as sexual tools, but that will is so honest. We can say so. Then the case of that type of guarding myself woman has also a right to abandon all of steady security and guarding instinct. But I cannot see trough all of women which type of the woman suppressive type of sexual actions or not. Spiritually not guarding instinct women to give their body easily has to be a type suppressive, but they are not suppressive in the body revel. Inversely physical pleasure is the object for clever women to reserve in the future pleasance or happiness, and women to do so is suppressive in the body revel.
But as concerned with love affection there’s an idea that love emotion is an illusion therefore not to need greedily is valuable judgment, namely its attitude is neither no actions to get any motions to get a different sex person nor not to be utilized so easily.
2009年11月20日金曜日
Chapter17 To be Ethical is an Idea toward To be Humanistic③
Here I say in individual happiness emotion, value itself include evil, and moved emotion has a characteristic to stay away from others’ entity at the same time of not interference, if we say “moved emotion” as to feel mercy to others, we can define that attitude as to know that we are the weaker existence not to help others knowing that the one to move us are in the crisis because of the lack of ability to rescue them completely. Therefore we can say that moved emotions are the one to get knowing our weakness, and when we are moved, we are egoistic ( if we wish all people’s happiness, we must abandon all moved emotion when we see a tragedy).
At this meaning individual happiness is the matter to supported by people when we’ve not gotten any happiness, and urged by all people, after getting it, the same as success we will get to be an object of jealousy, as the same of the scene of eating, even goddess beauty also gets to be ugly, disillusion us, getting happiness appears in front of neighbors none but being ugly. Namely human-beings are the existence to feel discontent because of being aware of the lack state of something, but after getting all lack parts, we feel empty after getting all as ennui. Then we are apt to decide all of abandoning of cravings and a need of lack parts, and that action would get to be a virtue. It becomes a value. But recognizing its value and being modest to do everything, and restrain greedy actions, and knowing that those actions would be praised by people, next we get to be pursuers to get a praise as holder of virtue and good suppresser from people around us. When we do so we need a merit. But those actions are so deeply ugly. Its attitude truly can said as fundamental evil said by Kant. Then we can paraphrase it to this attitude I narrated in Chapter15 has a contradiction with a vision of absolute solitude. Namely merely to set a value with others’ vision must drive it into valueless effect. Especially in the example at the view of Japanese not to tell any discontent to others, we can define Japanese’ attitude as persisting in self control power as showing modest to any desire of greedy. Then we can explain it to get a privilege to be recognized from others to be smart with controlling self desires. Namely it is equal to abuse of moral value self I narrated in Chapter13. In Japan it usually cannot be judged as so bad matter. This is the example of occidental world story. But we Japanese can grasp this content so much. In this stream of debate, we can say that also in the case of successful person we can find out the truth of fundamental evil by Kant that to all of jealousy around the successful person, he or she would try to tell that success must be grasped only by individual effort as a privilege. Its saying has a cold ignorance as a characteristic. Then like the matter we confirmed in Chapter14, the successful persons has a privilege to be told by the people that you can receive so many privilege because you have so hard effort to get success, he or she prove the fundamental evil with their actions. Then in intending to Chapter16’s universal value, from the starting point, it holds gentlemen’s ship to recognize mutual privilege only successful persons can hold. But to pursue individual value would be characterized as nonchalant posture to be greedy to get pleasant actions has a good effect because of the thought that except individual happiness none would be valuable has been composed completely and even excluding all challengers to be greedy self has being satisfied so much. All those attitudes have a strong declaration to the people bound with a steady common sense.
At this meaning individual happiness is the matter to supported by people when we’ve not gotten any happiness, and urged by all people, after getting it, the same as success we will get to be an object of jealousy, as the same of the scene of eating, even goddess beauty also gets to be ugly, disillusion us, getting happiness appears in front of neighbors none but being ugly. Namely human-beings are the existence to feel discontent because of being aware of the lack state of something, but after getting all lack parts, we feel empty after getting all as ennui. Then we are apt to decide all of abandoning of cravings and a need of lack parts, and that action would get to be a virtue. It becomes a value. But recognizing its value and being modest to do everything, and restrain greedy actions, and knowing that those actions would be praised by people, next we get to be pursuers to get a praise as holder of virtue and good suppresser from people around us. When we do so we need a merit. But those actions are so deeply ugly. Its attitude truly can said as fundamental evil said by Kant. Then we can paraphrase it to this attitude I narrated in Chapter15 has a contradiction with a vision of absolute solitude. Namely merely to set a value with others’ vision must drive it into valueless effect. Especially in the example at the view of Japanese not to tell any discontent to others, we can define Japanese’ attitude as persisting in self control power as showing modest to any desire of greedy. Then we can explain it to get a privilege to be recognized from others to be smart with controlling self desires. Namely it is equal to abuse of moral value self I narrated in Chapter13. In Japan it usually cannot be judged as so bad matter. This is the example of occidental world story. But we Japanese can grasp this content so much. In this stream of debate, we can say that also in the case of successful person we can find out the truth of fundamental evil by Kant that to all of jealousy around the successful person, he or she would try to tell that success must be grasped only by individual effort as a privilege. Its saying has a cold ignorance as a characteristic. Then like the matter we confirmed in Chapter14, the successful persons has a privilege to be told by the people that you can receive so many privilege because you have so hard effort to get success, he or she prove the fundamental evil with their actions. Then in intending to Chapter16’s universal value, from the starting point, it holds gentlemen’s ship to recognize mutual privilege only successful persons can hold. But to pursue individual value would be characterized as nonchalant posture to be greedy to get pleasant actions has a good effect because of the thought that except individual happiness none would be valuable has been composed completely and even excluding all challengers to be greedy self has being satisfied so much. All those attitudes have a strong declaration to the people bound with a steady common sense.
2009年11月18日水曜日
Chapter17 To be Ethical is an Idea toward To be Humanistic②
Namely to be humanistic only can be carried out with an order of moral to exclude an emotional feeling to get a mercy as the surplus. Then to join with a responsible moral to mercy or love feeling is the most difficult theme to solve. Or we cannot help but thinking of it. Because responsible moral is one as which we sometimes need a subjective attitude of coldness and merciless. According to that truth, the mercy is to practice all knowing a demerit of doing side with a determination, it can be in a dual with responsible moral. A fact that a responsible status person stay away from his or her family to go to rural area not center point of power would be for a rural people merciful but for the power concerned people or his or her family just only a betrayal.
Then to be responsible to all , to be merciful to all both are impossible. Then when we say “to be ethical is an idea toward to be humanistic “ it means to owe all of distress to make ends meet of each different cases of matters.
It means a distress which to take, which to abandon, sometimes remorse to merciless decision to choose some cold decision without hesitation. Thereby to be humanistic in choice or decision would not be meant merciful or wet emotional, on the contrary to those facts it means that the merciful decision would be misjudged so many cases.
Namely we can say next
“ I’d like to be merciful. But I cannot mercy to all of people, then I am aware that to declare not to be able to rescue all people and its powerlessness, and that attitude is responsible.”
That insistence self is the same as a decision that to humanistic is equal to excluding wet emotional feeling. According to that truth in this case, we define that to be merciful to others without any practicing power is none but irresponsibility.
Then to be responsible to all , to be merciful to all both are impossible. Then when we say “to be ethical is an idea toward to be humanistic “ it means to owe all of distress to make ends meet of each different cases of matters.
It means a distress which to take, which to abandon, sometimes remorse to merciless decision to choose some cold decision without hesitation. Thereby to be humanistic in choice or decision would not be meant merciful or wet emotional, on the contrary to those facts it means that the merciful decision would be misjudged so many cases.
Namely we can say next
“ I’d like to be merciful. But I cannot mercy to all of people, then I am aware that to declare not to be able to rescue all people and its powerlessness, and that attitude is responsible.”
That insistence self is the same as a decision that to humanistic is equal to excluding wet emotional feeling. According to that truth in this case, we define that to be merciful to others without any practicing power is none but irresponsibility.
Chapter17 To be Ethical is an Idea toward To be Humanistic①
Thinking of Ethical things is a Control to Not Ethical things in Chapter12, a matter we think of not moralistic or not ethical would be not humanistic. As a truth that not humanistic would be the same as a question of reasonable and moralistic and responsibility, not humanistic would be the same as the one to deviate the way of the question to live in human society as the significance of value. For example for the person who know he or she only live since not so far moment as several years or months, how to live in rest time is naturally decided as an individual answer according to detachment of coming soon of his or her death. The if we dare to define not to humanistic, we can define it as to live without any ideas with an individual value decision of contradictory aspect or to live with an idea of not admitting any values of getting an individual answer. Deviating value is the same being idle not to find out or to prepare individual answer of how to live the rest time or trespassing others’ one. All those have being understood by us.
Then for the person to have little time of his or her future, to live is just the best value as annalistic value and for accomplishing its annalistic value, to think of how to live the rest time and to decide any action he or she has not done can be said as the synthetic value as planning character.
Academic community is the world that only master and apprentice system can be passed. For example philosophy is usually thought by people that anybody can get an essence after getting piled experience of life. But it is a study that apprentice must learn a manner as fundamental knowledge, usually said as getting a post of vice professor since getting 34 or 35. It is so closing circle.
I don't know the foreign countries’circumstance, but I can say that keeping up with the same community tasks only convey the status as profession, cut its field is so troublesome. Therefore possibility to get success of changing the profession or restart a job or getting a chance to debate other professional worlds adjusting other professional methods or criticizing other genre professions is so lower in this country. This reality shows that idea of that originally the studies should be a thing to be opened to everybody except a professional people would be a form to be shown to popularity but really its world can be composed toward an object to keep up with professional people’s livings as narrow community in the view of narrow synthetic object.
Or thinking of marriage as the action to keep up with the social status is applicable for that synthetic and analytic judgment. If the partner to marry has hidden the trouble sickness to be held before the proposition to marry to myself would be a trigger to solve the claim to divorce in law order. In the case of inheriting the parents generation heritage of the business for the side to be hidden by his or her marriage partner to marry, action by him or her would perhaps be judged in the way of not only need to acquire of partner’s love but also an anticipation to get an economic power from future husband or wife as consideration.
Originally to say in love motivation definition, partners’ sickness would be the matter to share this distress, but before reality of marriage life, it needs a power to overcome its trouble as a responsibility, to hide serious matter to the partner as an action would be considered as the need to clear the true mind to hide those in the standpoint of divorcing claim( Especially hidden side of marriage has a hope to have children has a situation to be held secret by the partner skillfully despite of the confession to her or him to hope children before their marriage).
Namely even also an affection or moral are the matter to be judged as juridical and social rule as the judgment of synthetic vision. Paraphrasing it, surely the person to owe to a serious sickness or the giant debt would be an object to be rescued or considered with a care, but in the real problem, the thing to share the trouble is just an ideal action in the marriage life, at the matter of fact thinking of realization to that solution on the premise, the person to hold the power to solve all is so rare, because of the condition of economic power or a solid social status. Then a case to marry after mutual natural love emotion and planning to marry with an especial real condition to inherit a business management have each different manner as contents to plan the marriage for the partner. This reality has a chance to be driven to the problem of the question which is valuable loving emotion and marriage reality as a humanistic judgment, but in common sense that question has to be abolished as an ideal imagination as an armchair theory, originally humanistic judgment or moralistic judgment are on the premise to evaluate in the capacity to solve the problems or real power to live on economic standpoint. Then in the ethical view of responsibility realization as the power precedes a mercy.
Then for the person to have little time of his or her future, to live is just the best value as annalistic value and for accomplishing its annalistic value, to think of how to live the rest time and to decide any action he or she has not done can be said as the synthetic value as planning character.
Academic community is the world that only master and apprentice system can be passed. For example philosophy is usually thought by people that anybody can get an essence after getting piled experience of life. But it is a study that apprentice must learn a manner as fundamental knowledge, usually said as getting a post of vice professor since getting 34 or 35. It is so closing circle.
I don't know the foreign countries’circumstance, but I can say that keeping up with the same community tasks only convey the status as profession, cut its field is so troublesome. Therefore possibility to get success of changing the profession or restart a job or getting a chance to debate other professional worlds adjusting other professional methods or criticizing other genre professions is so lower in this country. This reality shows that idea of that originally the studies should be a thing to be opened to everybody except a professional people would be a form to be shown to popularity but really its world can be composed toward an object to keep up with professional people’s livings as narrow community in the view of narrow synthetic object.
Or thinking of marriage as the action to keep up with the social status is applicable for that synthetic and analytic judgment. If the partner to marry has hidden the trouble sickness to be held before the proposition to marry to myself would be a trigger to solve the claim to divorce in law order. In the case of inheriting the parents generation heritage of the business for the side to be hidden by his or her marriage partner to marry, action by him or her would perhaps be judged in the way of not only need to acquire of partner’s love but also an anticipation to get an economic power from future husband or wife as consideration.
Originally to say in love motivation definition, partners’ sickness would be the matter to share this distress, but before reality of marriage life, it needs a power to overcome its trouble as a responsibility, to hide serious matter to the partner as an action would be considered as the need to clear the true mind to hide those in the standpoint of divorcing claim( Especially hidden side of marriage has a hope to have children has a situation to be held secret by the partner skillfully despite of the confession to her or him to hope children before their marriage).
Namely even also an affection or moral are the matter to be judged as juridical and social rule as the judgment of synthetic vision. Paraphrasing it, surely the person to owe to a serious sickness or the giant debt would be an object to be rescued or considered with a care, but in the real problem, the thing to share the trouble is just an ideal action in the marriage life, at the matter of fact thinking of realization to that solution on the premise, the person to hold the power to solve all is so rare, because of the condition of economic power or a solid social status. Then a case to marry after mutual natural love emotion and planning to marry with an especial real condition to inherit a business management have each different manner as contents to plan the marriage for the partner. This reality has a chance to be driven to the problem of the question which is valuable loving emotion and marriage reality as a humanistic judgment, but in common sense that question has to be abolished as an ideal imagination as an armchair theory, originally humanistic judgment or moralistic judgment are on the premise to evaluate in the capacity to solve the problems or real power to live on economic standpoint. Then in the ethical view of responsibility realization as the power precedes a mercy.
2009年11月16日月曜日
Chapter16 Value has Originally a Difference exists between Universal one and Not So One
The people to work hard are doing their job with a steady value vision as a finger, in watching of all business in the society, we can confirm that two types of jobs with a type to do the jobs with rare people’s supports and a type of jobs with so many people’s support as universal one exists. Which type of jobs would be talked by future age people? We would be given only a neutral answer with a possibility that all of jobs would be talked.
But the person with a job is always aware of which type of job he or she has chosen, I think.
As concerned as me, I wouldn’t resign my job unless only one supporter of my job would be disappear.
I’d met a woman to think that she understood me so much rather than anyone. Despite of this when I show a concern to her body to her, she always refuse any trials of suggestion to attack her in my sexual desire with a rigorous claim that only a man with steady power of economy and social status can hold a woman’s body as a just right. According to that her attitude when I try to be concerned wit other women subjectively she always tried to stop my any trials to attack other women despite of the fact that I didn’t have any steady relation with her. I cannot forget that woman’s ugliness that truly she had a body desire so much but she tried to hide those because of being conscious of social modesty that every woman has to hold on the value vision forced to be given to them (She graduated from post graduate school). I can define my all of my younger days of my life a youth age to be mercy of being trapped by a bad woman( since the moment to decide not to meet her , I took eight years).
Trying to escape from this woman I had a intimate woman to talk, she was more than more than twelve years older. She (was a lecturer of my university) who couldn’t understand my desire to her body, when I abandoned all of trials to attack her she asked me why I didn’t try to attack her with sexual desire. Women are the existence not to be a lover but at the same time of it also the existence not to be a friend, at that time I held that impression. Other chance to hold that impression was none.
I was helter-skelter. I got to be aware of the rigorous difference exists between a desire of men to women and one of women to men. After the event I made me get a sexual pleasure as bubbles with prostitutes.
After those trials, I wanted to love anyone of woman. As my reminiscence to those days more precious experience for me was an experience with prostitutes more than ugly women I met, I can say so now. After those experiences I met several women and they implanted me so much about the spirit I’ve held since those days, but I reserve its story now.
I hate a word of Seiso as Japanese means modesty every women have to hold in Japanese society ethics forced to be given to all of unmarried women, That word is used in Junichi Watanabe as a famous novelist in Japan. Japanese so famous authorized dictionary Kojien shows its meaning that to be pure and be without any surplus emotion and ostentation. As my vision to all of women, women are the existence that can be divided only two of the side to try to devour the sexual desire and the side to sell their virgin value as snobbism with an idea only self is pure as ugly women ought to hold. In that category every women for example a women to marry someone can belong to alternative types. Especially a trial to abolish any prostitution in Japan, every male sex persons’ destiny has changed so much.
I’ll go back to the story of an ugly woman to met in my youth age.
Simply she was interested in me and my religion or belief. In spite of that a woman like her would never be aware of my belief of doing job as a finger of enthusiastic male sex person to job. It’s a truth of that type of women. But human-beings have a dream to assimilate the element of not understand in self vision subjectively as a hope to change myself. But rather women have a skill to hide that desire under pretentious face as pure lady. It’s also a truth.
According to all those facts, I felt that woman’s idea so ugly that to have a sexual intercourse with prostitutes or to have so many experience of sexual relationship to many women is not moralistic and she had become like a mother to male sex person as me. For me mother as an existence is enough as my true mother. In the relationship between men and women has no moral. Merely virgin of so bad woman is so many. Jiust because of that truth, words by Junichi Watanabe, I have a strong sensual desire to pure Seiso woman would cause my angry emotion as objection. (from “A manner to have a sensual desire”) Is to be Seiso so valuable really?
But even it would be only a truth took by my individual experience. Probably so many people to have completely different experience to my one would exist. Then if the writer was here to be concerned with that point namely except own truth, so many truth would exist, and write , that person is inverse to me. I am an inverse type of writer. At least in that type of value vision or truth vision originates in own experience, I cannot select the method to write inexperienced matter and pretending to be known attitude completely, and I always want to be honest at that point.
Then a characteristic to my writing style would have so rare supporters with sympathy and understandings. I am aware of it surely. At that meaning I belong to the type of Dr. Yoshimichi Nakajima rather than Itsro Kohama as my writer’s stance. But despite of the type similarity I would never hope to write a claim to my parents or derogation to my family like Dr.Nakajima. My father was dead so long time, and my mother is alive now. I don’t want to write the matter of them especially.
(Any family has a little trouble without exception). If I had a neck of mind to them, I would reserve it in my deep part of my mind. That is at one meaning my ethical vision as a writer.
From Chapter11 to Chapter this I subjectively write all, but at the next chapter, I’d like to think with synthetic vision and annalistic vision and intentionally think so willingly all.
But the person with a job is always aware of which type of job he or she has chosen, I think.
As concerned as me, I wouldn’t resign my job unless only one supporter of my job would be disappear.
I’d met a woman to think that she understood me so much rather than anyone. Despite of this when I show a concern to her body to her, she always refuse any trials of suggestion to attack her in my sexual desire with a rigorous claim that only a man with steady power of economy and social status can hold a woman’s body as a just right. According to that her attitude when I try to be concerned wit other women subjectively she always tried to stop my any trials to attack other women despite of the fact that I didn’t have any steady relation with her. I cannot forget that woman’s ugliness that truly she had a body desire so much but she tried to hide those because of being conscious of social modesty that every woman has to hold on the value vision forced to be given to them (She graduated from post graduate school). I can define my all of my younger days of my life a youth age to be mercy of being trapped by a bad woman( since the moment to decide not to meet her , I took eight years).
Trying to escape from this woman I had a intimate woman to talk, she was more than more than twelve years older. She (was a lecturer of my university) who couldn’t understand my desire to her body, when I abandoned all of trials to attack her she asked me why I didn’t try to attack her with sexual desire. Women are the existence not to be a lover but at the same time of it also the existence not to be a friend, at that time I held that impression. Other chance to hold that impression was none.
I was helter-skelter. I got to be aware of the rigorous difference exists between a desire of men to women and one of women to men. After the event I made me get a sexual pleasure as bubbles with prostitutes.
After those trials, I wanted to love anyone of woman. As my reminiscence to those days more precious experience for me was an experience with prostitutes more than ugly women I met, I can say so now. After those experiences I met several women and they implanted me so much about the spirit I’ve held since those days, but I reserve its story now.
I hate a word of Seiso as Japanese means modesty every women have to hold in Japanese society ethics forced to be given to all of unmarried women, That word is used in Junichi Watanabe as a famous novelist in Japan. Japanese so famous authorized dictionary Kojien shows its meaning that to be pure and be without any surplus emotion and ostentation. As my vision to all of women, women are the existence that can be divided only two of the side to try to devour the sexual desire and the side to sell their virgin value as snobbism with an idea only self is pure as ugly women ought to hold. In that category every women for example a women to marry someone can belong to alternative types. Especially a trial to abolish any prostitution in Japan, every male sex persons’ destiny has changed so much.
I’ll go back to the story of an ugly woman to met in my youth age.
Simply she was interested in me and my religion or belief. In spite of that a woman like her would never be aware of my belief of doing job as a finger of enthusiastic male sex person to job. It’s a truth of that type of women. But human-beings have a dream to assimilate the element of not understand in self vision subjectively as a hope to change myself. But rather women have a skill to hide that desire under pretentious face as pure lady. It’s also a truth.
According to all those facts, I felt that woman’s idea so ugly that to have a sexual intercourse with prostitutes or to have so many experience of sexual relationship to many women is not moralistic and she had become like a mother to male sex person as me. For me mother as an existence is enough as my true mother. In the relationship between men and women has no moral. Merely virgin of so bad woman is so many. Jiust because of that truth, words by Junichi Watanabe, I have a strong sensual desire to pure Seiso woman would cause my angry emotion as objection. (from “A manner to have a sensual desire”) Is to be Seiso so valuable really?
But even it would be only a truth took by my individual experience. Probably so many people to have completely different experience to my one would exist. Then if the writer was here to be concerned with that point namely except own truth, so many truth would exist, and write , that person is inverse to me. I am an inverse type of writer. At least in that type of value vision or truth vision originates in own experience, I cannot select the method to write inexperienced matter and pretending to be known attitude completely, and I always want to be honest at that point.
Then a characteristic to my writing style would have so rare supporters with sympathy and understandings. I am aware of it surely. At that meaning I belong to the type of Dr. Yoshimichi Nakajima rather than Itsro Kohama as my writer’s stance. But despite of the type similarity I would never hope to write a claim to my parents or derogation to my family like Dr.Nakajima. My father was dead so long time, and my mother is alive now. I don’t want to write the matter of them especially.
(Any family has a little trouble without exception). If I had a neck of mind to them, I would reserve it in my deep part of my mind. That is at one meaning my ethical vision as a writer.
From Chapter11 to Chapter this I subjectively write all, but at the next chapter, I’d like to think with synthetic vision and annalistic vision and intentionally think so willingly all.
2009年11月12日木曜日
Chapter15 Value to get tougher to be isolated
It was a truth that successful persons are the existence that could be able to attract any sympathizers with a revengeful emotion. And that trial by a successful person was never forever. Its trial would be driven to setback, because adoration to idols is ephemeral. Value vision concerned with success is ephemeral fantasy. Success is the thing to fall down to only authoritarianism as real destiny. Then making a ideology
a value not to believe in others and not to hold an instruction to live isolated as not holding loneliness. Its living style is meaningful. Namely the most problematic thing is to be scared of the others emotion not to be so sympathizing Of course we needn’t to be seen as bad impression than necessity, and being objective than necessity. But at the same time of it, we needn’t to be sympathized by others than necessity. Not only it but also that trial is the thing as a destiny that mentality to make an effort to be careful of it drives us not to get anything but getting us restrained in a small world. The idea that value is on the point between myself and others all would be a titled supposition made by a society. Simply value is always the thing to be able to believe in for myself. That saying is repetition as what is self as proposition, for others the things precious for me is also only a common place matter example. Paraphrasing it, in that grade already value is produced by value and value falls down to illusion or phantasm at the moment having an emotion to think that we need understandings or consensus of co-owning from others. Then inversely we should abandon all of desire to make own preciousness co-owning or anticipation from others as under mind. Then as an extreme opinion, only that things precious for self is the matters not to be able to be shared by all others would be an idea of universal value.
Namely value isn’t the thing to be understood by others, it’s a truth. In that impossibility to be shared is a reason to consist of value. It can be paraphrased to that to be aware of a possibility to be precious for self is not so precious for others but me is only the idea to make value valuable matter. It’s a truth. Then that truth can be explained only by
a truth that to be valuable for a person has a mechanism of capacity to keep up with holding in mind not understood by anyone but me.
Why is it so? It is in the simple truth that value self couldn’t be compared by anything. According to its truth, public any functions as a power know that value is the thing individually anybody hold, is not the thing public for anybody. Then inversely the idea that universal value couldn’t disturb any individual values is only the right thing as
public spirit. In the point at one meaning, perfection not to disturb any others’ value as no interference could be produced. Then a reason to name this chapter as Value to get tougher to be isolated is caused from the truth that others have others’ value and we cannot interfere with those, then
it’s impossible to make a collision between any values, then we have no way but to abandon all of force to share a value and we can say that to get tougher to be isolated is equal to hold self value in deep inside of my mind. It means only the way to keep up with my value.
a value not to believe in others and not to hold an instruction to live isolated as not holding loneliness. Its living style is meaningful. Namely the most problematic thing is to be scared of the others emotion not to be so sympathizing Of course we needn’t to be seen as bad impression than necessity, and being objective than necessity. But at the same time of it, we needn’t to be sympathized by others than necessity. Not only it but also that trial is the thing as a destiny that mentality to make an effort to be careful of it drives us not to get anything but getting us restrained in a small world. The idea that value is on the point between myself and others all would be a titled supposition made by a society. Simply value is always the thing to be able to believe in for myself. That saying is repetition as what is self as proposition, for others the things precious for me is also only a common place matter example. Paraphrasing it, in that grade already value is produced by value and value falls down to illusion or phantasm at the moment having an emotion to think that we need understandings or consensus of co-owning from others. Then inversely we should abandon all of desire to make own preciousness co-owning or anticipation from others as under mind. Then as an extreme opinion, only that things precious for self is the matters not to be able to be shared by all others would be an idea of universal value.
Namely value isn’t the thing to be understood by others, it’s a truth. In that impossibility to be shared is a reason to consist of value. It can be paraphrased to that to be aware of a possibility to be precious for self is not so precious for others but me is only the idea to make value valuable matter. It’s a truth. Then that truth can be explained only by
a truth that to be valuable for a person has a mechanism of capacity to keep up with holding in mind not understood by anyone but me.
Why is it so? It is in the simple truth that value self couldn’t be compared by anything. According to its truth, public any functions as a power know that value is the thing individually anybody hold, is not the thing public for anybody. Then inversely the idea that universal value couldn’t disturb any individual values is only the right thing as
public spirit. In the point at one meaning, perfection not to disturb any others’ value as no interference could be produced. Then a reason to name this chapter as Value to get tougher to be isolated is caused from the truth that others have others’ value and we cannot interfere with those, then
it’s impossible to make a collision between any values, then we have no way but to abandon all of force to share a value and we can say that to get tougher to be isolated is equal to hold self value in deep inside of my mind. It means only the way to keep up with my value.
2009年11月9日月曜日
Chapte14 Value in Social Success
Social success is based on a destiny that it leads successful persons to be precipitated into a downfall. Why is it so? Because success itself consists in a ephemeral motivation.
For example people to get a popular society status in publishing world as so many take a method to be in success to confess a setback experience and hold a catchy sales point as the worst mistake or failure. They declare that so vivid will to get success would absolutely lose to get a success because positive thought held in them, to people without so steady setback experience as revenging to them. Namely success means a characteristic that leads to revenge as a indispensable element.
That characteristic is applicable to the prime minister so popular in several years ago. It was an obvious fact that his supporters was so few before his inauguration. And a philosopher not to be able to love others is also so, he got a success with getting only supporters to share a setback experience as publishing world states. Or neuro-scientist introducing British atmosphere to welcome a pain in the neck of the society and insists on a rigorous rule taken in the British society to choose a superexcellent pain in the neck is also so. They have gotten a steady success with a way to revenge so normal common place people with eyes characterized as discrimination to pain in the neck.
Then those successes have a destiny to make supporters to be away from them. People supporting them would feel a boring emotion to them not to be able to have sympathy to pain in the neck. But unexpectedly the case without those setback and revenge tug is so rare. Then from a instruction of Buddhism if a person existed to have a wish to be successful and the situation to have not any success is based on the objective people to away from him or her, their success in the future means that discontinues a successful condition at the falling moments after a short time success.
Then an idea that to think of a successful situation or falling situation self has to be abolished or envy a successful people in Buddhism is right to lead us to a stable spirit of ourselves excluding any troubles. Then to think of that value would become a valueless being with a mind to persist in getting many would lead us a right situation, therefore originally less to want many wouldn't lose so many in our mind.
Then an idea that a reality to live as we do is merely valueless is one of our best means. There are so ambitious people with a sharpened enthusiasm to get any success in our society. Its attitude is so empty. Those people have an envy to have a hope or a dream to the future knowing that a future of them is none and they make an effort to breaking any hope of those people and it is a religion of them.
For example not successful middle aged man of fifty generation has an idea that nineteen aged youth with a ambition to his or her future as he lived more than two times of him or her and he can instruct him or her to be persuasive to him or her or, seventy-five years old man has an idea that to get a thankfulness from a middle aged fifity generation man with a word of wisdom to gain ground to that middle aged man, all of those is so futile, because usual people have a capacity to read a under mind to get thankfulness even the people to have not so talented.
All of people don't have any capacity to see through others' lives from a birth moment, that fact has been known by anybody. Even parents don't know their sons or daughters so perfectly. Others for them is rather so. Then I've warn to the people to behave to know all of myself as a vision of life. Namely even our parents to know our all parts are none, rather in the case of the others. The poor not to know that is none.
Namely it is truth that only to know only not to be able to change others' minds so easily and have a resignation or detachment of these trials. It is only way to keep up with our lives so stable not to be disappointed so much. Thereby if a successful person have a mind of it , he would absolutely think of his or her success as to be afraid of, but that person is so few, according to that truth, so many successful people have a joyfulness originates an accomplishment of revenging the other people.
Then a fact to get success is none but an omen to fall.
For example people to get a popular society status in publishing world as so many take a method to be in success to confess a setback experience and hold a catchy sales point as the worst mistake or failure. They declare that so vivid will to get success would absolutely lose to get a success because positive thought held in them, to people without so steady setback experience as revenging to them. Namely success means a characteristic that leads to revenge as a indispensable element.
That characteristic is applicable to the prime minister so popular in several years ago. It was an obvious fact that his supporters was so few before his inauguration. And a philosopher not to be able to love others is also so, he got a success with getting only supporters to share a setback experience as publishing world states. Or neuro-scientist introducing British atmosphere to welcome a pain in the neck of the society and insists on a rigorous rule taken in the British society to choose a superexcellent pain in the neck is also so. They have gotten a steady success with a way to revenge so normal common place people with eyes characterized as discrimination to pain in the neck.
Then those successes have a destiny to make supporters to be away from them. People supporting them would feel a boring emotion to them not to be able to have sympathy to pain in the neck. But unexpectedly the case without those setback and revenge tug is so rare. Then from a instruction of Buddhism if a person existed to have a wish to be successful and the situation to have not any success is based on the objective people to away from him or her, their success in the future means that discontinues a successful condition at the falling moments after a short time success.
Then an idea that to think of a successful situation or falling situation self has to be abolished or envy a successful people in Buddhism is right to lead us to a stable spirit of ourselves excluding any troubles. Then to think of that value would become a valueless being with a mind to persist in getting many would lead us a right situation, therefore originally less to want many wouldn't lose so many in our mind.
Then an idea that a reality to live as we do is merely valueless is one of our best means. There are so ambitious people with a sharpened enthusiasm to get any success in our society. Its attitude is so empty. Those people have an envy to have a hope or a dream to the future knowing that a future of them is none and they make an effort to breaking any hope of those people and it is a religion of them.
For example not successful middle aged man of fifty generation has an idea that nineteen aged youth with a ambition to his or her future as he lived more than two times of him or her and he can instruct him or her to be persuasive to him or her or, seventy-five years old man has an idea that to get a thankfulness from a middle aged fifity generation man with a word of wisdom to gain ground to that middle aged man, all of those is so futile, because usual people have a capacity to read a under mind to get thankfulness even the people to have not so talented.
All of people don't have any capacity to see through others' lives from a birth moment, that fact has been known by anybody. Even parents don't know their sons or daughters so perfectly. Others for them is rather so. Then I've warn to the people to behave to know all of myself as a vision of life. Namely even our parents to know our all parts are none, rather in the case of the others. The poor not to know that is none.
Namely it is truth that only to know only not to be able to change others' minds so easily and have a resignation or detachment of these trials. It is only way to keep up with our lives so stable not to be disappointed so much. Thereby if a successful person have a mind of it , he would absolutely think of his or her success as to be afraid of, but that person is so few, according to that truth, so many successful people have a joyfulness originates an accomplishment of revenging the other people.
Then a fact to get success is none but an omen to fall.
2009年11月5日木曜日
Chapter13 Human-beings’ meanness to admit secretly a skill to abuse ethical value
In Japanese society, same as in the U.S. society, to admit to live skillfully and adore those persons to live so and mock a person to live so seriously as thinking tide can be seen in all ages. I cry for the reality to see so many dirty and mean people to perform all skillfully and do not do any trouble things and escape anything dangerous as avoiding any troubles. All those phenomenon are caused from an idle egoism had by managers to think of all troubles as to discriminate things to be thought seriously as the theme of debate from other nasty problems to handle as the things to be dealt with so difficultly easily. They spoil all nasty problems.
But Japanese often discriminate awkward person to do anything to claim a trouble not to accuse or impeach or denounce skillful persons. In Japan a virtue not to claim anything is common sense, In the U.S. virtue to claim anything is common sense, that’s all.
The person of Japanese loses a merit when he or she claims anyone, they try to make any other person to claim, the persons in the U.S. is probably upset. They live with some wisdom to evade a way to lose a merit caused from less trial to claim anyone. But both sides are in the state of ideal society. Namely they take a way of knowing any unwritten laws, evading any demerits and try not to be demeritorious and not to be constructive. In any ages trials to be constructive causes a dual. But Japanese hate it and keep silence to keep up with their right, people in the U.S. make a dual even in the case of my side is sinful trying to guard my side and choose a method to break a silence as only way to guard myself as an unwritten law.
These two types of examples says a good explanation to the fact that a common sense of society impacts value vision. It just isn’t an attitude to construct values selves creatively. It is a judgment to live evading any troubles in the situation that values are controlled. My motivation to write this consists in that point.
To be frank to say, being so naturally without any decisions to fight against an attitude to obey any rules without hesitation as admitting a paradigm to control any value vision, and thinking of anything in that paradigm taking any values as a gifted by authority not talking an attitude to create values is the most hateful value vision. The way to choose anything without dilemma or having any choice but to fight against a dull common sense is the most hateful attitude.
But the persons to do so are so many. They haven’t any choice but it. An atmosphere to evade any collision against others originates in the attitude of having a thought that only a thinking of the truth to create values is valuable is wrapped in all of nations.
Surely in my memory, Nietzsche or Levinas ought to say, the phenomenon that strong person make themselves weaker because of the truth weaker ones have a jealousy or an envy to strong ones have a strong attack caused from a guard defensive attitudes in any side of nations.
Merely Japanese have a strong trend as characteristics of implicit consciousness to exclude a type of persons to take a responsibility subjectively, or any other nations’ people have the same mentality like a cobweb. That attitude can be characterized by
a guard or a defensive instinct to prevent any mentally owing matters. And the escape from a responsibility all over the society invites the situation that only the person to perform pretending a weaker person with an appearance to be intellectual because of a skill to shut out any demands from others as usual gentlemen take in skilful way to escape any troubles.
A trial to hide any true mind skillfully and pretend a mindful person as gentlemen usually have robs of any true mind of people, as showing an attitude that only gentle attitude invites an ethical value and abuse ethics, and evade any persons to collide with others awkwardly. After all we are getting to be cheated by only the person to abuse any words with technical tactics
I gift a person to be weakened and not to be able to saying anything as being nervous human-being needn’t be a VIP in the society. Originally the person to decide someone can be a VIP is only the God.
Because any person have another side people objected by myself, in the objection to take some people as my side is equal to take another people as enemy as evil for me. According to that truth, completely right person to control the truth can be a
Fake at all. It is so, especially for me as not believing in any god existence.
But people have a tendency to take the VIP as respectable ones, another to say,
anybody take a strategy to make myself to be seen as a big person from other people, and its trial is wisdom to live trough a severe world. We needn’t to be a VIP, that evaluation self is only a fake or illusion.
After all I can say that pretending to be a VIP can be only a method to try to be peaceful to others without collision as utilizing an evil to be permitted by a common sense. Because so many people to pretend to be ethical and evasive to any responsibility skillfully, thereby to think that that meanness is not so sinful is a permitted attitude to live trough a severe world. If you did so cleverly, you are a smart and legitimate or full dress abuser to evils.
But Japanese often discriminate awkward person to do anything to claim a trouble not to accuse or impeach or denounce skillful persons. In Japan a virtue not to claim anything is common sense, In the U.S. virtue to claim anything is common sense, that’s all.
The person of Japanese loses a merit when he or she claims anyone, they try to make any other person to claim, the persons in the U.S. is probably upset. They live with some wisdom to evade a way to lose a merit caused from less trial to claim anyone. But both sides are in the state of ideal society. Namely they take a way of knowing any unwritten laws, evading any demerits and try not to be demeritorious and not to be constructive. In any ages trials to be constructive causes a dual. But Japanese hate it and keep silence to keep up with their right, people in the U.S. make a dual even in the case of my side is sinful trying to guard my side and choose a method to break a silence as only way to guard myself as an unwritten law.
These two types of examples says a good explanation to the fact that a common sense of society impacts value vision. It just isn’t an attitude to construct values selves creatively. It is a judgment to live evading any troubles in the situation that values are controlled. My motivation to write this consists in that point.
To be frank to say, being so naturally without any decisions to fight against an attitude to obey any rules without hesitation as admitting a paradigm to control any value vision, and thinking of anything in that paradigm taking any values as a gifted by authority not talking an attitude to create values is the most hateful value vision. The way to choose anything without dilemma or having any choice but to fight against a dull common sense is the most hateful attitude.
But the persons to do so are so many. They haven’t any choice but it. An atmosphere to evade any collision against others originates in the attitude of having a thought that only a thinking of the truth to create values is valuable is wrapped in all of nations.
Surely in my memory, Nietzsche or Levinas ought to say, the phenomenon that strong person make themselves weaker because of the truth weaker ones have a jealousy or an envy to strong ones have a strong attack caused from a guard defensive attitudes in any side of nations.
Merely Japanese have a strong trend as characteristics of implicit consciousness to exclude a type of persons to take a responsibility subjectively, or any other nations’ people have the same mentality like a cobweb. That attitude can be characterized by
a guard or a defensive instinct to prevent any mentally owing matters. And the escape from a responsibility all over the society invites the situation that only the person to perform pretending a weaker person with an appearance to be intellectual because of a skill to shut out any demands from others as usual gentlemen take in skilful way to escape any troubles.
A trial to hide any true mind skillfully and pretend a mindful person as gentlemen usually have robs of any true mind of people, as showing an attitude that only gentle attitude invites an ethical value and abuse ethics, and evade any persons to collide with others awkwardly. After all we are getting to be cheated by only the person to abuse any words with technical tactics
I gift a person to be weakened and not to be able to saying anything as being nervous human-being needn’t be a VIP in the society. Originally the person to decide someone can be a VIP is only the God.
Because any person have another side people objected by myself, in the objection to take some people as my side is equal to take another people as enemy as evil for me. According to that truth, completely right person to control the truth can be a
Fake at all. It is so, especially for me as not believing in any god existence.
But people have a tendency to take the VIP as respectable ones, another to say,
anybody take a strategy to make myself to be seen as a big person from other people, and its trial is wisdom to live trough a severe world. We needn’t to be a VIP, that evaluation self is only a fake or illusion.
After all I can say that pretending to be a VIP can be only a method to try to be peaceful to others without collision as utilizing an evil to be permitted by a common sense. Because so many people to pretend to be ethical and evasive to any responsibility skillfully, thereby to think that that meanness is not so sinful is a permitted attitude to live trough a severe world. If you did so cleverly, you are a smart and legitimate or full dress abuser to evils.
Chapter 12 Ethical things is a Control to Not Ethical things／About Human-beings’ Cruelty
When we are saying so ethical, in the case that being ethical is proper, we applaud it as being so ethical. At the moment of the survival of human-being is on the crisis, clearly human-beings get aware of importance as valuable ethics to cooperate with each other. But just because of emergency, joking each other cooperating is so valuable ethics or a moral. And also to say that witty humor joking each other is a ethical valuable thing would be too right.
On the other hand, on the interview of newspapers or TV programs, as to be questioned from interviewers “ Now what do you like to do ?” or “What is you’re the most interesting idea to do ?” and answering “ having a body relationship with so many women” would be not so proper to readers or audience, not so , absolutely taboo thing to say so, including it, to answer so is absolutely inhibited. But married person sometimes have a feeling that to have a sexual intercourse with another women except self wife. At the matter of fact, including the action to avoid it on the faith of religion or doctrine not to perform it or even hope to so is too inhibited, in the reality to dare to do so, we can prove a reality that we have some hope to do so, and the society recognizes its truth.
Male sex person not to hold any religious mind would even think that to have so many body relationships to various kinds of women not on the standpoint of public manifest to public papers or electric waves on hidden mind is not so sinful as a desire to have an envy from other guys on the natural truth of biology standpoint.
That truth shows to us that including the thought that hoping so is sinful and questing so is too sinful, really ethical things and ethical society common sense selves rather think so and it proves that all ethical things work as a defensive power to suppress an idea at a moment of doing so, doesn’t it?
Namely we can say that to be ethical self could have being set as an intention to suppress all of our desires not to escape from as evil instinct. It’s not all.
Human-beings have a moment to laugh someone not as a response toward a trial to make others laugh as an intention, as a response to someone with mistakes unexpectedly for example mistake to say something. This means that because human-beings have an instinct to laugh others’ unfortunate things, originally human-beings have an instinct to be pleased with others’ misfortune, namely evil parts.
This example shows the coincidence to the fact that emotion to be moved caused from the confirmation to misfortune of the person not to be dealt with carefully by anyone, and anybody do not to try to exclude that emotion.
Namely to need an ethical value self has a characteristic that original need to be aware that supposition of non-ward homo-sapience without any ethical values would cause any happenings. The fact to set a moralistic paradigm self with language proves our inner cruelty merely to hold a laugh to miserable of others’ mistakes and our awareness to ourselves of evils holding a desire to have a sexual relationships to other women but wives on the other hand of kindness to self partners
Value self recognize a raison d'être of evils, namely unless the society gets to be precipitated to disorder and also recognize a personal freedom or evaluating a type of working style not to be always perfect but keeping normal state of working style to continue to work at the same place, the society even need a flexibility.
A need or a standpoint that to be ethical is equal to need to cry for a true ethical value at the moment not to have any ethics but at the moment to full of ethics to cry for it would be valueless exists in front of us, for example management status people including administrators should be generous to subordinates, not to say any tiny claims to tiny subordinates’ mistakes but at the serious moments say so frankly anything equal to respect an ethical judgment but if at a normal revel of keeping a good condition of works by subordinates, in judging ethical or not so ethical, sometimes holding back a steady moralistic saying attitude, namely balancing all of judgments. They need to study a balance.
Why we can say so is caused from the truth that even the people to run to crimes knows that ethical things exists for controlling not ethical things as a ruler. How come knowing so, is knowing that anybody feel funny at others’ mistakes and pleased with that witnessing and after all knowing our so characteristics of cruelty. Unless that cruelty is small, it would be okay, but excelling a critical point its characteristics could change it discrimination. Truly discrimination would me made so. Paraphrasing it, to see that ethical values exist for something has a reason we have an awareness to hold an evil and cruelty.
On the other hand, on the interview of newspapers or TV programs, as to be questioned from interviewers “ Now what do you like to do ?” or “What is you’re the most interesting idea to do ?” and answering “ having a body relationship with so many women” would be not so proper to readers or audience, not so , absolutely taboo thing to say so, including it, to answer so is absolutely inhibited. But married person sometimes have a feeling that to have a sexual intercourse with another women except self wife. At the matter of fact, including the action to avoid it on the faith of religion or doctrine not to perform it or even hope to so is too inhibited, in the reality to dare to do so, we can prove a reality that we have some hope to do so, and the society recognizes its truth.
Male sex person not to hold any religious mind would even think that to have so many body relationships to various kinds of women not on the standpoint of public manifest to public papers or electric waves on hidden mind is not so sinful as a desire to have an envy from other guys on the natural truth of biology standpoint.
That truth shows to us that including the thought that hoping so is sinful and questing so is too sinful, really ethical things and ethical society common sense selves rather think so and it proves that all ethical things work as a defensive power to suppress an idea at a moment of doing so, doesn’t it?
Namely we can say that to be ethical self could have being set as an intention to suppress all of our desires not to escape from as evil instinct. It’s not all.
Human-beings have a moment to laugh someone not as a response toward a trial to make others laugh as an intention, as a response to someone with mistakes unexpectedly for example mistake to say something. This means that because human-beings have an instinct to laugh others’ unfortunate things, originally human-beings have an instinct to be pleased with others’ misfortune, namely evil parts.
This example shows the coincidence to the fact that emotion to be moved caused from the confirmation to misfortune of the person not to be dealt with carefully by anyone, and anybody do not to try to exclude that emotion.
Namely to need an ethical value self has a characteristic that original need to be aware that supposition of non-ward homo-sapience without any ethical values would cause any happenings. The fact to set a moralistic paradigm self with language proves our inner cruelty merely to hold a laugh to miserable of others’ mistakes and our awareness to ourselves of evils holding a desire to have a sexual relationships to other women but wives on the other hand of kindness to self partners
Value self recognize a raison d'être of evils, namely unless the society gets to be precipitated to disorder and also recognize a personal freedom or evaluating a type of working style not to be always perfect but keeping normal state of working style to continue to work at the same place, the society even need a flexibility.
A need or a standpoint that to be ethical is equal to need to cry for a true ethical value at the moment not to have any ethics but at the moment to full of ethics to cry for it would be valueless exists in front of us, for example management status people including administrators should be generous to subordinates, not to say any tiny claims to tiny subordinates’ mistakes but at the serious moments say so frankly anything equal to respect an ethical judgment but if at a normal revel of keeping a good condition of works by subordinates, in judging ethical or not so ethical, sometimes holding back a steady moralistic saying attitude, namely balancing all of judgments. They need to study a balance.
Why we can say so is caused from the truth that even the people to run to crimes knows that ethical things exists for controlling not ethical things as a ruler. How come knowing so, is knowing that anybody feel funny at others’ mistakes and pleased with that witnessing and after all knowing our so characteristics of cruelty. Unless that cruelty is small, it would be okay, but excelling a critical point its characteristics could change it discrimination. Truly discrimination would me made so. Paraphrasing it, to see that ethical values exist for something has a reason we have an awareness to hold an evil and cruelty.
2009年11月4日水曜日
Chapter 11 Valuable ethics and Ethical Value
According to I mentioned former chapter, when we think of meaning of ethics, I defined that a capacity to hold a thought that others are also live as individual particular living is just a myself, then to think of myself as a special existence but to think of it would be a general fact for all of us is an ethical imagination.
And thinking so, and cooperating others, concede others something, making a harmony to others, responding others’ requests, backing away from others, denying others’ requests, refusing others claims, to all of those selves, to quest a justice of those performance is also an ethical quest. Namely in all of cases of each question, we can evaluate as a ethical value.
On the other hand, to quest question self is truly a meaningful quest or not is possible. For example in judging each cases on retrospective consciousness or properness vision as it is a good thing to do, it is not so proper thing to do, it was so retrospective action to review as thing to be reformed, to quest to quest so ethically is effective or not is different in each cases. Then at a time to quest, because a thought that only to quest isn’t enough ethical good action would be composed, naturally valuable ethics or ethical value would be also composed.
Namely a question self about ethics is effective and not effective at each cases, a case that to quest so is not so meaningful also would exist. According it, also a case that ethical valuable thing self is valuable exists, but inversely just because with ethical value a case that itself would be meaningless also would exist.
Really those cases exist usually. When we see a comedy variety TV programs, and laughing at a joke by comedians, to analyze a meaning of or criticize a gag which comedians did in that program laughing it would not be a constructive for the family with friendly mood. Laughing itself has a meaning, and to analyze or criticize a properness of laughing is mistook action at that time. And when conversation partners say to us as joking and realizing it, to ask a partners what he or she said with a gesture not to realize that joke would be a judgment that lacks a meaning of moralistic idea that to listen to others’ saying and understanding others ideas’ meaning. When our conversation partners say a joke, we should be in a position to listen to a joke, it would be different from a situation to listen to serious talks, we should absorb true mind partners to say a joke. Of course jokes is not universal at each cases, a situation with serious mood not fit for a joke also exists.
At an aspect of narrating it, in properness to judge a joking action in that situation a case not to judge a moralistic criticism would be positioned as a properness in family, a judgment only to laugh a gag by talent in TV programs not showing a gesture to realize a meaning of laugh, self is a moralistic value, but then to judge a case to laugh at a comedy variety or joke someone to make him or her to laugh is meaningful or not self would be able to be judged as judgment self justice. “ Laughing at that moment would be moralistic or to judge its laugh is proper, then ethically valuable” its saying can be consisted. Though at a case a man judge a saying by others to himself as bad meaning despite of that it is not so difficult contents, if a partner to demand an advise say that to joke you so by that person is not so proper for you and himself as so childish namely not moralistic but to anxious it so heavily self or judging it with moralistic vision is not so meaningful, he or she would judge that he or she said to a man can be judged as moralistic standard as ethical value, but a decision self that judgment is so serious in mind could be judged as valuable ethics.
To say that it is meaningless to judge it so seriously would be paraphrased to say that it isn’t a valuable ethics , namely it’s valueless ethics.
And thinking so, and cooperating others, concede others something, making a harmony to others, responding others’ requests, backing away from others, denying others’ requests, refusing others claims, to all of those selves, to quest a justice of those performance is also an ethical quest. Namely in all of cases of each question, we can evaluate as a ethical value.
On the other hand, to quest question self is truly a meaningful quest or not is possible. For example in judging each cases on retrospective consciousness or properness vision as it is a good thing to do, it is not so proper thing to do, it was so retrospective action to review as thing to be reformed, to quest to quest so ethically is effective or not is different in each cases. Then at a time to quest, because a thought that only to quest isn’t enough ethical good action would be composed, naturally valuable ethics or ethical value would be also composed.
Namely a question self about ethics is effective and not effective at each cases, a case that to quest so is not so meaningful also would exist. According it, also a case that ethical valuable thing self is valuable exists, but inversely just because with ethical value a case that itself would be meaningless also would exist.
Really those cases exist usually. When we see a comedy variety TV programs, and laughing at a joke by comedians, to analyze a meaning of or criticize a gag which comedians did in that program laughing it would not be a constructive for the family with friendly mood. Laughing itself has a meaning, and to analyze or criticize a properness of laughing is mistook action at that time. And when conversation partners say to us as joking and realizing it, to ask a partners what he or she said with a gesture not to realize that joke would be a judgment that lacks a meaning of moralistic idea that to listen to others’ saying and understanding others ideas’ meaning. When our conversation partners say a joke, we should be in a position to listen to a joke, it would be different from a situation to listen to serious talks, we should absorb true mind partners to say a joke. Of course jokes is not universal at each cases, a situation with serious mood not fit for a joke also exists.
At an aspect of narrating it, in properness to judge a joking action in that situation a case not to judge a moralistic criticism would be positioned as a properness in family, a judgment only to laugh a gag by talent in TV programs not showing a gesture to realize a meaning of laugh, self is a moralistic value, but then to judge a case to laugh at a comedy variety or joke someone to make him or her to laugh is meaningful or not self would be able to be judged as judgment self justice. “ Laughing at that moment would be moralistic or to judge its laugh is proper, then ethically valuable” its saying can be consisted. Though at a case a man judge a saying by others to himself as bad meaning despite of that it is not so difficult contents, if a partner to demand an advise say that to joke you so by that person is not so proper for you and himself as so childish namely not moralistic but to anxious it so heavily self or judging it with moralistic vision is not so meaningful, he or she would judge that he or she said to a man can be judged as moralistic standard as ethical value, but a decision self that judgment is so serious in mind could be judged as valuable ethics.
To say that it is meaningless to judge it so seriously would be paraphrased to say that it isn’t a valuable ethics , namely it’s valueless ethics.
2009年11月2日月曜日
Chapter10, What is myself?
In the reality that actions have a relation to others, we in the meaning of myself or others have known the fate actions can be grasped only by ethics. But it's too fast to sift to essential proposition straightly what ethics is. Then we must quest what myself is.
About this problem, "What is myself?" by Sumio Hamada Psychoanalyst in Japan is the book which narrates so many things about it, and we can say that in front of others we face an active and passive relation but at a time to be alone we have no relation of it, but Dr.Hamada said that also at a time to be alone we face a reality that we hold a relation to others. That is right. Namely myself has a faculty that if it has no others in front of him or her, instead of others he or she makes others in myself. Paraphrasing it, we live as myself holding essential others.
When we think of ethical problems or value vision, we have other choice but touching this problem. That truth claims that we have a need to think of the contradiction that we have private value and public value as a discrimination vision. Why do we think with distinctive vision between privacy and publicity.
Surely solipsism says that for us the world opens through ourselves' problems or conditions. But if we think so alone, to think so is universal thinking anybody hold, that point of view must appear in front of us. Rather solipsism has a premise that it needs others' existence. Namely at the moment to say that we cannot grasp all of world's matters with our eyes or our minds, at the matter of fact, a faculty to say so self means that it is a public problem, not private one, and we ourselves know that so really. Then myself is a capacity to make others at the time to hold no real others subjectively, at the same time of it, to merely be myself as solipsism talks to others, namely thinking that this only is myself or saying so to others already in the ability to talk something or thinking of it, the world is not the thing that we only can see with our eyes, essentially the seen world is universal property to everybody as the necessity truth. At the matter of fact to think so self proves that we ourselves all is not so different to all of others except myself.
Paraphrasing it, myself is from my existence only usual others as same as for usual others.
If we think I am the special one, the imagination that other guys breath oxygen but I breath CO2 is meaningless. We see that rapidly. Surely myself destiny is sole thing. But if all of others live with same idea, surely my destiny is so general thing. Namely in the meaning of anybody not the one who isn’t not sole existence. And just because of it, inversely myself as to be sole is rather general thing for all of us. It is the false that I only is seen as general existence but anybody. Namely to be aware of it is just to acquire myself, we can say so.
About this problem, "What is myself?" by Sumio Hamada Psychoanalyst in Japan is the book which narrates so many things about it, and we can say that in front of others we face an active and passive relation but at a time to be alone we have no relation of it, but Dr.Hamada said that also at a time to be alone we face a reality that we hold a relation to others. That is right. Namely myself has a faculty that if it has no others in front of him or her, instead of others he or she makes others in myself. Paraphrasing it, we live as myself holding essential others.
When we think of ethical problems or value vision, we have other choice but touching this problem. That truth claims that we have a need to think of the contradiction that we have private value and public value as a discrimination vision. Why do we think with distinctive vision between privacy and publicity.
Surely solipsism says that for us the world opens through ourselves' problems or conditions. But if we think so alone, to think so is universal thinking anybody hold, that point of view must appear in front of us. Rather solipsism has a premise that it needs others' existence. Namely at the moment to say that we cannot grasp all of world's matters with our eyes or our minds, at the matter of fact, a faculty to say so self means that it is a public problem, not private one, and we ourselves know that so really. Then myself is a capacity to make others at the time to hold no real others subjectively, at the same time of it, to merely be myself as solipsism talks to others, namely thinking that this only is myself or saying so to others already in the ability to talk something or thinking of it, the world is not the thing that we only can see with our eyes, essentially the seen world is universal property to everybody as the necessity truth. At the matter of fact to think so self proves that we ourselves all is not so different to all of others except myself.
Paraphrasing it, myself is from my existence only usual others as same as for usual others.
If we think I am the special one, the imagination that other guys breath oxygen but I breath CO2 is meaningless. We see that rapidly. Surely myself destiny is sole thing. But if all of others live with same idea, surely my destiny is so general thing. Namely in the meaning of anybody not the one who isn’t not sole existence. And just because of it, inversely myself as to be sole is rather general thing for all of us. It is the false that I only is seen as general existence but anybody. Namely to be aware of it is just to acquire myself, we can say so.
登録:
コメント (Atom)
