We to solidify memory for unifying myself as justification to myself, try to write unconsciously, rather than dinky fact minuteness, we precede even not so uninteresting meetings as meaningful. It can apply the case of others’ impolite saying to me, even to it we try to permit others’ impoliteness in attitude or action. It is a merciful decision in the meaning of conscience or reason. But it is also based on a calculation to my fault case’s permission from others and it leads myself into mercy to others, then it would be Kant’s fundamental evil.
Then we have a chance to admit my trivial mistake or wink at others’ mistake as we deal with perception not to be moved so much minutely, in this meaning we can be not to proper if we apply it to Kant’s fundamental evil. Namely it’s our needed idleness as indispensable instinctive wisdom
But we at the same time of it need to charge ourselves in introspection as not philosophical ordinal meaning at the moment we face the important or grave decision
,regarding our habit as being ready to rewrite memory with cognition about fundamental evil. And we need to be aware of our emotional, calculative idleness exist deep inside our minds to be concerned with our assessment to others
Namely we have both the situation to be caught as serious or not so serious not to be memorized as dinky matter (positively we should forget), and its assessment has a relation to memory and experience, namely former chapter’s truth minutely.
登録:
コメントの投稿 (Atom)
Because I wrote paper in Japanese and rewrite in translated to English as this blog,and I used the U.S.philosopher Sydnie Shoemaker's description in Japanese translated in that original one,I tried to perchase his original text,and I found it so expensive if I get with Amazon,then I can never continue to translate original japanese paper of mine. More original rest parts I want to release, please wait for a while untill I get any original papers in English as material to quote.
返信削除I absolutely restart this blog sometime in the near future.