Chapter25 Experience and Value(3)

Then for example novelists, Japanese them are assorted because the type to specialize Japanese as cultural characteristics of special faculty and the type even recognizing traditional spirit, more international vision is taken in them and pursuing universal story or theme, or composing phrase style anticipating the form to be translated or any other types exist with so deep river among them. Of course top revel writers have a talent to overcome each side difference. Namely various meaningful and much talented to activate own faculty is their characteristic.
Then as to be professional some have a custom to work in night, sleeping in daytime, its style of living is not concerned with creative talent or persuasion to readers. Then recently praise novelist as Akutagawa Praise businessman face and writer’s talent can be assimilated in one personality. It’s rare case, we can take him so. Thereby if one has so much talent to create a novel world, he or she has a permission to have a fault not to be able to wake up early, or not so goodly dressed, all those defects aren’t concerned with his or her true ability as writer.
At this meaning, recently happening event of entertainers’ stimulus abuse is not concerned with ability or their achievements, and the difference toward young generation people’s spirit and all of those are each different matter, we should be aware of it. Ordinal Japanese moral relies on the assimilation of usual living attitude as virtue and ability or talent to work with specialty as common sense of society.
By the way generally truly authentic person with an idea that human’s entity has inherently goodness are apt to take an attitude pretending bad guys skillfully. He or she has an emotion to dislike spots on human entity. He or she try to hide their true emotion not to be disliked by ordinal people. Namely he or she tries to play on the role of anti-hero or heroine, and outlaw.
But their pretension to be bad isn’t so natural and full of fraud or falsehood. But miserably those types of cases are many in our society as my impression.
Namely an attitude seen in elite class so-called cultural intelligent people gets to be assorted because we think already that value self should be owned by many people as common treasure and it cannot be grasped as one thing
But for each person hold an idea that it’s fraud that recognizing of values as assorted, it’s solely one. It’s necessity as long as we don’t lie to anybody. Despite of it, there’re so many values around our each individual life and some never admit my value, we can be aware of it as natural cognition, that’s all. 　
But rarely some are the existence to make us in trouble with vise, because of it we must to be careful to others being not to be apt to tell rapidly true mind as thought or anything. Namely we has an ability to guard own entity. Paraphrasing those, its self defense attitude to others is wisdom gotten only after experiments, we can define. And if we have synthesized thought form we are apt to take an attitude hiding its stance, its wisdom has gotten in our custom after experimenting, if value self can be composed by experience, at the matter of fact we can be aware that experience it self doesn’t include so much sympathies gotten by other person’s admission unexpectedly and it includes so much things gotten in myself only after a feeling nobody admit and only myself can admit and have a persistence to hold as treasure, then an emotion caused from the setback gotten after not to be admitted by others would work as main poll to consist inner value feeling through an experiments of us.

Chapter 25 Experience and Value(2)

As more interesting fact, we get to have something of general information about not professional fields. It’s common sense or current belief. They work as harm to self professional jobs or especial skill or ability, but it’s for us not so serious thing, not only but also they are cushion toward friends or colleagues as communication on human relationship for example concerned with pastime or hobby. They’re intellectual system on every single days of our life.
All those things are so light that we can use them to keep up with human relation and just because of those being not truth even half lie works as pastime or hobby conversation. As long as not concerned with public situation, or friends’ conversation.
For example for artists or scientists, creativity or invention or discovery is valuable for human future, despite of that truth, curiosity babies often hold on them even adult persons have, they work as harm to politics or region society community conversation. Namely strange element as characteristics of personality can be evaluated only in special fields, then all those talents are things have gap among general society as professional field faculty, we can realize so.
For example short track running athletics need precision time record but marathon runners don’t need not so strict or rigid time record. Difference two or three minutes are not to important in the condition of which marathon has on difference of climate condition or geographic condition, short track athletics usually have. We all even not professional persons can be aware of the characteristics difference between two types of sports.
Namely that judgment not professional persons have is common sense judgment world. That type of current belief is a little different skill from especial skill persons as professional. Namely usually older citizens or veteran persons as any professional fields in mentioned matters can have proper judgment.
According to that truth, usually all those faculty or ability is different from especial skills, general experienced knowledge are different quality from elite ability, of course exceptional cases exist. In spite of those, it’s never always that all those wisdom cannot be needed. Namely those need life experience, then every professional persons have each different knowledge but general knowledge except professional one surely rigidly exist, because we need to judge not professional matters around our living reality as must of society life keeping ability.

Chapter 25 Experience and Value(１)

To particularize something or evaluate it actually relies on usual experience. And also we produce each time judgment and difference exists between it and not so big concerns with our usual experience and memorization of impressive events. At the meaning toward general memory concern matters, signification of experience is big, that is necessary, also experience works as contribution to value vision.
But it gives us a curiosity that experience itself can be lead to a result as actions by vision toward value. But at the first step of our life, we can’t help but recognizing that experience composes value as a factor to lead that fact.
Namely in an accordance to language learning we step by step have a bud to consciousness toward value. It is made with an experience to be praised by others or denounced by them, and get to figure out that something should never be repeated again. (In that experience some young children get to have an action not to be recovered as their life security in social common sense.)
But because with those experience we own a particular paradigm as categorized vision in creative thought, necessarily we get to own intention to the future as action with those categories as method to correspond. And with a pile in that paradigm and experience’s repetition,our life itself can be composed in a carrier.

Chapter24 Value to Need Judgment Solidification and Consensus to Others②

Namely value self is the thing to be needed as finger in action or matter to awake us to the fact that truth is never like a absolute thing and not a omniscient matter. Paraphrasing it for that reason it should be consensus among myself and others not force. Namely in waiting for it subjectively, value is solidified judgment, it has a characteristics to be reserved as intention. Consensus among myself and others means always relative solidification. But of course in what value is value, it would be right and trustful, there’s also a role value to prevent us from believing in absolute truth easily with persisting in it’s never always not mistaken. Its truth includes even nature physic law, human supreme moral, or anything. Of course despite of all those facts, truth belongs to supreme standard, it’s never a wrong fact.
Namely to keep up with combination exists among several values as trustful and about absolute facts always we should be awoken that entity has a wrong thing, in that truth, we need a consensus to other people, with it, we could judge in right angle, in that standpoint value is needed by us. Then entity needs existing human-beings with a possibility to consider, namely only with a human-being entity could be composed, then an entity meant minimal could exist. Just for it, in absolute truth we need a consensus among others that even entity could go wrong, we need always consensus among others, in those action, value itself needs others’ consensus, its only a method to prevent value itself from go wrong.

Chapter24 Value to Need Judgment Solidification and Consensus to Others①

Here we have gotten a conclusion. It's that value is composed in a trial to solidify judgment and value solidification starts to need others' consensus necessarily. Value itself is the thing to be solidified at a meaning but it's never absolute and includes a possibility to be changed. Then for maintaining the value itself state we need a consensus to others and we are also needed by them. For being as value itself, we need a necessary procedure and we don't admit the things experienced a procedure. To agree with something self means to see some matters or some actions under a solidified value. What value has objectivity is for getting a result with a truth and universality. Then value isn’t a priori. It is the thing to be composed. The value as an action has virtue and characteristics to be shared can be thought as the thing to be universal with steady truth as characteristics.
But why we need to solidify the judgment is caused from that judgment is the thing to be reactive action at each moments as feedback and posture to any emergent situations. But at one meaning always we have an invitation toward a custom at no changeable situation necessarily. If at an invitation toward it, we need to compose the posture, it would be feedforward posture. Namely that we have another unchangeable situation except situations to need own posture ,it means to abolish not solidifying to every moments would be suitable, there we get to need solidified situation as value. According to it, judgment solidification with value is smoothly composed in solidification. And we can have a peace of mind with its selection to keep up with a solidified value, there are sometimes exceptional cases with trouble, namely two different type of situation always exist, the consensus to each different disposal. Namely truth teaches us that recognizing a suitable situation as solidified and evading the situations solidification works as an obstacle, having them as contradictious truths’ co-existence is our indispensable condition we should have.
Then value is always relative. It means not absolute. But despite of it, all of judgment shouldn’t be random absolutely, judgment is always the thing should be solidified. For it we need always consensus among any other persons, but at the time to decide we need always a space to change something toward solidified value. Value is surely the thing with universal with truth, but at the same time of it, because it includes a possibility to be changed, then it isn’t equal to truth. But it doesn’t mean any truth is complete as God like entity. Originally value itself is always needed to be changed as flexible thing, even the truth can be overturned with a space we can do it. It is a claim by value relativity.

Chapter23 Value and Fascination②

But its dual cognitions are mutually supported each other. When we take a matter and an action, they can be quested in their raison d'être both for myself or others in reason. After all when we say myself, we take others a premise, when we say others, we take them for myself. Then at some chances we can share only value, on the other hand, as concerned with fascination we take it as individual difference exists. Namely we think that every other person has both publicly evaluated values can be trusted and fascination can be interested in by myself.
Then when we have a fascination toward a matter or an action, always those are the objects can be understood only by myself, if its possibility is so higher, even minority, we need supporting members to help each other, if its possibility is so lower, we admit any majority mentality. To former, we try to find out fellows, because we cannot give up any minds to have a fascination to evaluated things, and to latter, we take them fascinating because they have been evaluated already. Then necessarily a relation between value and fascination in minor supporting spirit we seek our identity seeking minor supporters, at latter case, we think of myself to assimilate others’ opinion, namely in retrospective thinking we speculate either admit naturally an evaluated matters majority support, or try to find out other valuable matters, in doing so we build myself in a relation between self and others. Namely to realize inner mentality value and fascination are taken advantage of in our lives.
At the case of that value self has fascination, we a little take care of general others’ opinion, at the same time of it, take own feeling about myself in seeing myself assimilating other persons, if the case that we have a fascination making myself imagine its object often leads us to that we gat to know that its object be already evaluated by general people, inversely the case that we take something an action or a matter as so evaluated already but its object really nobody has evaluated still now, after a long time observation by myself, we get to know its object is just only the thing only myself has continued to evaluate.
Then even if something has been evaluated, we often cannot regard it as not so valuable, but on the other hand even the situation myself has found out its charm but others except me has never evaluated it still now is not so rare.
Former we have often a mind to protest general opinion as reputation to it being driven to authorized solidified it, and latter we would be driven to try to persuade anybody except myself as claim to others about its orthodoxy. Just because of for value, fascination works as an important role to admit it in my inner mind world, for fascinating something(includes entity) value would work as finger to keep up with egoism or self persistence to valuable things for myself

Chapter23 Value and Fascination①

Originally our ancestors produced currency to get something, it means that they recognized all of citizens had desire to survive as equal possession deserves needing currency. And whether value itself produced fascination, or fascination produced value would be a difficult question.
Namely an action, a thing, an existing thing all of them have raison d'etre, then
as actions or as things all of them have been grasped from ancient ages. Value itself is a value ‘cos it has raison d'etre, whether we grasp something because it has value, therefore we take its fascination or it has fascination, therefore we take its value, it’s the question we should address.
When we regard something valuable, in our cognition, we take it should be better than others or other method or action shouldn’t be taken as properness. Namely we take it as adjustable and reasonable and having raison d'etre, and meaningful. Just because of its judgment we can take its thing or action valuable. On the other hand, because we think it has meaning and fascinating, we think it has value. Of course its fascination is assorted because it has difference exists between public consensus to value vision and extremely private judgment of myself as individual person. Then we can be lead to the result that fascination has a characteristics that fascination be composed with naming valuable, at the same time of it, value be composed with judgment to fascinating thing.
In naming value, the fact that other person except myself should be adjoined each other. We believe already established value. Against it, when we give a value to fascinating thing here is subjective mind to persuade others. Then former action is authoritarian cognition is added. But latter action is, in action to give it an authority, authoritarian, but its thing isn’t already given any authority by others, it is never named valuable in trust to others. It is faithful to own sensibility.