Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality4

We to solidify memory for unifying myself as justification to myself, try to write unconsciously, rather than dinky fact minuteness, we precede even not so uninteresting meetings as meaningful. It can apply the case of others’ impolite saying to me, even to it we try to permit others’ impoliteness in attitude or action. It is a merciful decision in the meaning of conscience or reason. But it is also based on a calculation to my fault case’s permission from others and it leads myself into mercy to others, then it would be Kant’s fundamental evil.
Then we have a chance to admit my trivial mistake or wink at others’ mistake as we deal with perception not to be moved so much minutely, in this meaning we can be not to proper if we apply it to Kant’s fundamental evil. Namely it’s our needed idleness as indispensable instinctive wisdom
But we at the same time of it need to charge ourselves in introspection as not philosophical ordinal meaning at the moment we face the important or grave decision
,regarding our habit as being ready to rewrite memory with cognition about fundamental evil. And we need to be aware of our emotional, calculative idleness exist deep inside our minds to be concerned with our assessment to others
Namely we have both the situation to be caught as serious or not so serious not to be memorized as dinky matter (positively we should forget), and its assessment has a relation to memory and experience, namely former chapter’s truth minutely.

Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality3

Of course we can say that love creates also hatred. Instinctively someone can evade holding hatred, probably he would be a good personality. But if he or she is so, one can evade harm originates in hatred with one’s wisdom, he or she wouldn’t be always affectionate. Of course good affectionate one can exist, if he or she shows affection, essentially one can be affectionate, he or she would be jealous too, then disappointment of anger would be bigger, inversely affectionate one can be awkward to evade risky situation generally, despite of it, being skilful to evade risks makes someone be a calculating person. But it is not so generalized truth.
Namely distortion to formal memory content or justification to misremember is caused from obedient mind to authority.
Then some decisive mind in hesitation which we should take to be continuous keeping company with someone or to cede its relation relies on trust to someone or affectionate emotion to him or her in assessing personality. Namely it’s cognition of human-relationship assessment and a decision.
Thereby we experience to get to be in rage according to grade of trust in meeting someone’s action and getting disillusioned, originally hatred robs us of our energy, the decision not to be enthusiastic to change a feeling into anger regarding it as not valuable with cool gaze. Its decision has an idea that to be to trustful isn’t profitable, we can say so, but at the same time of it, even the great personality would be conceited, we can be aware of it, and its decision has that meaning.
What I said now is so important. Because we often forget necessary truth, a dinky it discovered by us accidentally is regarded as so important by us, and we persist in it and after a few while, we get to be aware again of after all truth exists in another place. And still we are apt to hold blind trust to favorite persons and thereby we hate them after loving so much easily. But even if our anticipation is betrayed by them, holding detachment is the best cognition for all of us, because we aren’t be perfect entity and we mustn’t forget it

Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality2

But the decision not to make much of capricious action or performative declaration or action is at one meaning that we wink at a gap between action fact and real personality, in revel of perception surely we can regard it as positive abolishing. Namely for keeping unified personality we don’t doubt our capacity to rewrite memory as abolishing trivial things. It is very little evil as we try to call it a necessity evil. If its wisdom is eliminated, we would be in a trouble at our usual living. Why we do so is caused from that we need to see our habit as fundamentally object for keeping personality not minute assessment in the both meaning of toward myself, toward others It can be called a decision to assess personality in trust of human relation as social living. Namely we are not always composing others’ images along the reality, rather we often regard others’ shyness or hesitating attitude as bad will, necessarily we often misjudge others’ images as assessment.
Namely a person of threatening attitude is often one feels delicately not so evaluated or assessed as not so good talented or characterized as not so good from threatened one in fear to threatened one. Paraphrasing it unexpectedly other person we have a gap feeling to him or her could be analogous to ourselves. Therefore we are said to get mutual trust to others generally, not careful to dinky mistakes by others or caprice by others taking an important action object
Then to a person to take so impolite attitude to ourselves saying that once upon a time he or she was so good character person, if he or she is old, he or she gets to be older, judging so, we often assess him or her as senile dementia.
Therefore after seeing his or her changing, we can rely only on how we could love or being generous to him or her from that time on. Then a reason to say that personality as value is based on mutual realization between other person is that personality is the thing to be made by mutual love among mutual human-beings. Rewriting of memory is said to be a decision by love to repair dinky mistake or caprice by other person with cultivation of personality.

Chapter26Value as Personality is Based on Realization made between Self and Others／Rewriting Memory Relies on Preceding Solidification of Personality1

Sydney Shoemaker said in his text “ Self Knowledge and Self Identity” that we can doubt that subject of memorized thought or experience is present subject of experience or not, but we can’t doubt that memorized thought or experience was those of myself, then person’s identity isn’t subject or identity of substance, duration of personality needs no substantial duration.
This means that subject self is so changeable, hasn’t been trusted by us, or disposition of substantial and biological facts are each different was created, we can say so, but according to my opinion, I have another idea except it.
It is next. Namely personality self is different from biological nor action fact, if we take it into consideration that self cognition is always open to the future, we can think that it shows that what we can judge with totality and what we feel ourselves as myself do never accord with each other, all are in hollow, and it shows also a relation to that hope in myself or expectation is always in gap between reality, as those fact a cognition to one other person is based on self tilth to all of cognition, but it isn’t merely a action fact accumulation but also a thing we can read with our subject. Namely personality is made from our realization to others made between ourselves and others, in it we can find out evaluation, judgment, appreciation exist. It’s a decision.
Then sometimes if we discover a gap between memorized thing and existing in reality, if we persist in we think of there’re different from talked matter by one personality and recorded thing and it’s mistake according to record’s rightness must be a truth, we clearly solidify personality self and judge miss record to its record and we try to keep our personality identity.
Namely we judge it’s top priority that keeping personality’s justice is more important than keeping trivial memorized matter and despite of that we are aware of self falsehood we rewrite memory. Of course dinky mistake guarding is in question.
Then judgment to precede that it should have been so rather than that it was so surely exists as authoritarian idea, and care to others. Therefore its difference or gap to record or memory despite of an opinion exists that its action or utterance contents was so really. The case we should gaze at straightly to its truth, but the case we should deal with compromising judgment resetting the truth also exists. A judgment self which decision is suitable is done in experiential judgment. Of course improper case and proper case both exist.
And its judgment relies on subjects of any personality. Dinky difference gets to be so bigger then some trouble between each human relation sometimes happens.
But important fact is that assessment to personality creates applicable or suitable action or language activity to personality in question. Namely even if we have a good impression to one personality, with some action facts we get to have some doubt to one, then we usually abolish former set assessment to oneself , we revise personal cognition. On the other hand of it, to reliable trustful other person, we even know not so good fact as acting or saying to him or her, we regard it as caprice, and keep up with former assessment, we often meet an opportunity of him or her effort to contact us fitting him or her to our judgment with replying our anticipation as assessment.
It can be applied in the case of mutual sympathy kept state, but sometimes the case with which evil taking advantage to our trust is evoked exists. And all of those cases aren’t in generalization because any time events are accidental
Namely assessment to personality is equal to decision of human relation or choosing object to contact as person. Then not so important person is the exceptional case that we can’t be denounced by others to be concerned with reason to make only ambiguous assessment as long as we say in public
And also if we discover extreme gap exists between action fact and personality assessment, it judger gets to be an object as not so evaluated nor denounced personality. Or actually very extreme case in question, we often even discover mental disease