Value at the first time to be judged as valueless tries to protest already evaluated value , because it keeps up with doing so, it holds so steady intention. But it gets an admission from society, it gets conservative attitude and gets to be precipitated into authoritarianism. It’s a destiny. Value has characteristics to deny as to be seen genuine since the moment to be evaluated by authority. A quality of being moved would be genuine unless it gets no reputation from outside as it is fine as a prejudice. According to that truth, value has a destiny to get itself into guard posing since the moment it has valuable signification as value for the person as authorized as VIP as creator of valuable things or performer of valuable actions. Then if Sumo wrestlers has only all of a win game as Sumo tournament since first day, they at the day before last day of the tournament or after ten games, he usually lose the game because their intention is bound by a consciousness to win as word of victory. They lose a game by a defeating of a wrestler weaker than them, despite of the fact that if they hasn’t so steady that intention, they never defeated by them.
If a writer publishes a novel or something after so evaluated masterpieces of novel or something, he has so difficult situation at the release without an impact by before success. A success of newly release of novel or something getting rid of before masterpiece’s impact or consciousness of that one is so rare. But if a writer has an effort to writing a newly trail without consciousness before success, and release a different type of masterpiece without a trial to be evaluated by accustomed pattern, he or she would succeed at least of the vision not to rely on past success. He or she has a future possibility at this point. Namely a braveness to create a masterpiece not to be evaluated by anyone gives writers or creators a future possibility to do the release of their works at a proof that he or she has a steady policy or stance not to be in a guard position to protest the conservative attitude.
All of actions has characteristics to claim a justice of action should be done Even if a writer or creator has a consciousness that evaluated works has a consciousness to be evaluated, therefore he or she try not to be evaluated by authority, if he or she has no standpoint that actions intend to no evaluation from anybody only has a value, he or she would absolutely plunged into the same perversion as authoritarianism at the moment to think so. Namely it also has an intention to others’ eyes as his or her consciousness ( at this case usually he or she has a thought that next generation people or strangers would evaluate his or her works ).
Then all of actions at the limit of acting has an intention to need to be evaluated, they has a destiny not to be able to escape that way.
Namely a decadence parousia’s awareness is needed for all of actions of ourselves. Why it would be so? Because all of actions effectively has characteristics to involve any other persons and self-actions already at the moment to act would be involved on cause and effect relation. It has no way except it. At this meaning all of actions would be in a destiny as a category value-no value.
It is the same of Sisyphus’s rock conveying. Thereby action has latently a driven power as evil in destined meaning as recognizing a significant action intends to authority’s reputation or ignoring not evaluated actions truly valuable.
Paraphrasing it, all of actions people do at the characteristics to be in self and others relation has a destiny not to escape from value-not value category or goodness-evil category as reputation from outside except myself, and defining an action as actions has a destiny to drive us into be in an evil and goodness, therefore we can say that action-self has to be in a rule of moralistic vision, we can position all of actions into a ethics.
2009年10月28日水曜日
2009年10月27日火曜日
Chapter 8 Admitting a Value and Needing a Moving emotion driven②
Then necessarily an accident produces a genius. If we say that that genius as saying is valuable and treasure of human-beings, value is always the thing that we can define that an idea to lead us into a trial making an accident a necessity
after something happened. Namely value isn't a naming to already evaluated thing but one to be defined as it is a value with an indicating produced thing in the focused situation.
And in the things we evaluate some special thing as human-beings we start calling them genius. But we don't be moved by that person, but his or her achievement or works or masterpieces. After all we don't be moved by a charm of his or her characteristics. The object we can define a value produces or a power of value produces something would make us to think that the person to produce those are the extraordinary as their images. It is rather near to the thing to make us to feel that their efforts are the action to barren effects or a trial and error to meaningless things. Despite of its truth, we never evaluate them since their efforts are evaluated, if the moment comes to evaluate their efforts as being proclaimed that authorized person gives us an evaluation to their efforts, we inversely evaluate their efforts after the moment. Namely before the moment we belong to the mass not to be able to see through truly evaluated matters as junk group but after the moment we try to change ourselves as evaluators to their efforts. But these actions of ourselves prove that we are all merely the commonplace people not to be able to see through valuable matters, but we don't want to be aware of its fact.
Then a first condition of mechanism of value is on the standpoint that we need a authority that never evaluate a newly trial as the attitude authority usually takes, in the situation that a incapacity that leads no effect to evaluated truly valuable things is needed to find out a truly evaluated matters as element to compose value.
Namely truly valuable matters have a destiny to protest against all of authorities and not to admit all of already evaluated matters or authorities as endowment.
Namely already evaluated matters also couldn't deprived of their value after newly evaluated matters appear, a world bristles with various values and rather values collide with each other. It is their fate. But in the situation we do it as a real could help but admitting it is so, if a value could never deprived of their evaluation by another values, we can help but admitting a relative logic. At the same time of it, we can recognize that the claim by a value is not only the absolute opinion but also a value exists as harm to other values as the meaning of one value. But for one value self is merely the supreme value, never admit other values, it can never evaluate a relative logic.
Then a value for one person can be a choice among bristling existent values. If he or she choose one value, he or she never overturn that decision. At this fact he rather choose a way to exclude any other values he or she didn't choose.
If he or she evaluates any other values, at this moment he or she precipitates himself or herself into a falsehood to him or her. At this moment he or she loses a true value we can say only so. But we can observe so many cases like it, despite of that fact we all want to think that only myself don't belong to those group.
For one person at one moment, there's only a value, he or she can get one value. But he or she lives not for one moment, but for all moments. And moments sift from here to there, from present to past, from future to present. Namely a quality as being moved by something or evaluated in myself can change and sift always. A recognition to all sifts reality is just proof of not relativists of ourselves and a real that in spite of that we misjudge all, we think that our judgment is absolutely misjudged ones.
after something happened. Namely value isn't a naming to already evaluated thing but one to be defined as it is a value with an indicating produced thing in the focused situation.
And in the things we evaluate some special thing as human-beings we start calling them genius. But we don't be moved by that person, but his or her achievement or works or masterpieces. After all we don't be moved by a charm of his or her characteristics. The object we can define a value produces or a power of value produces something would make us to think that the person to produce those are the extraordinary as their images. It is rather near to the thing to make us to feel that their efforts are the action to barren effects or a trial and error to meaningless things. Despite of its truth, we never evaluate them since their efforts are evaluated, if the moment comes to evaluate their efforts as being proclaimed that authorized person gives us an evaluation to their efforts, we inversely evaluate their efforts after the moment. Namely before the moment we belong to the mass not to be able to see through truly evaluated matters as junk group but after the moment we try to change ourselves as evaluators to their efforts. But these actions of ourselves prove that we are all merely the commonplace people not to be able to see through valuable matters, but we don't want to be aware of its fact.
Then a first condition of mechanism of value is on the standpoint that we need a authority that never evaluate a newly trial as the attitude authority usually takes, in the situation that a incapacity that leads no effect to evaluated truly valuable things is needed to find out a truly evaluated matters as element to compose value.
Namely truly valuable matters have a destiny to protest against all of authorities and not to admit all of already evaluated matters or authorities as endowment.
Namely already evaluated matters also couldn't deprived of their value after newly evaluated matters appear, a world bristles with various values and rather values collide with each other. It is their fate. But in the situation we do it as a real could help but admitting it is so, if a value could never deprived of their evaluation by another values, we can help but admitting a relative logic. At the same time of it, we can recognize that the claim by a value is not only the absolute opinion but also a value exists as harm to other values as the meaning of one value. But for one value self is merely the supreme value, never admit other values, it can never evaluate a relative logic.
Then a value for one person can be a choice among bristling existent values. If he or she choose one value, he or she never overturn that decision. At this fact he rather choose a way to exclude any other values he or she didn't choose.
If he or she evaluates any other values, at this moment he or she precipitates himself or herself into a falsehood to him or her. At this moment he or she loses a true value we can say only so. But we can observe so many cases like it, despite of that fact we all want to think that only myself don't belong to those group.
For one person at one moment, there's only a value, he or she can get one value. But he or she lives not for one moment, but for all moments. And moments sift from here to there, from present to past, from future to present. Namely a quality as being moved by something or evaluated in myself can change and sift always. A recognition to all sifts reality is just proof of not relativists of ourselves and a real that in spite of that we misjudge all, we think that our judgment is absolutely misjudged ones.
2009年10月23日金曜日
Chapter 8, Admitting a Value and Needing a Moving emotion driven①
Already I narrated, to moved emotion driven matters, we are moved with an object’s condition as being ignored perfectly of a heroes or heroines efforts and tortured by something. Paraphrasing it, we can define our moving emotion as we hold it with a condition that we need commonplace people or trivially valueless matters as not admitting and not being moved magnificent matters include performance or actions efforts as essentially great. Of course after their death nobody remember them. But they have wisdom of cooperating each other spontaneously. Namely we admit a need to valueless so much things to make up a splendid things to move ourselves setting a contrast magnificent ones and commonplace ones not to admit any valuable matters ignoring great ones and connive any mental discrimination. Therefore it is a truth that we admit valueless matters as indispensable ones in splendid things as a need. They are the element of evils. Paraphrasing it, we recognize an evil when we admit a recognition to the best value, not only it but also unconcern to unfairness or unjust and we suspend and overlook any steady settlements and emancipations to those contradiction. Even with an idea that we have an mean idea to declare that we hold no faculty to settle those as humility or modesty. Despite of it, we are not reluctant to admitting valuable matters and with that action we make others to admit our powerlessness. Its action originates a feeling or emotion that caused from an idea not to be responsible to completely needed matters can be orthodoxy as civil right. We are all aware of its fact.
Schopenhauer related on his book “ Existence and Distress”, that distress is a condition to raise a genius. Then on the step of making genius we admit so many not talented people as citizen are needed as a landscape of appearing heroes or heroines as genius as not far as concerned the judgment of making genius’s orthodoxy. But saying so, he also probably couldn’t see through a true genius as so many citizens misjudge among merely commonplace people and was aware of it. Just because of it genius must have a condition of devastate not to be evaluated by anybody. Or another to say, genius is already not genius, he or she was created after a distress or a situation in just distress not to be evaluated justly by anyone. He or she make an effort to tiding over that trouble. And so small part of those only could be a genius. Probably Schopenhauer wanted to say so.
Schopenhauer related on his book “ Existence and Distress”, that distress is a condition to raise a genius. Then on the step of making genius we admit so many not talented people as citizen are needed as a landscape of appearing heroes or heroines as genius as not far as concerned the judgment of making genius’s orthodoxy. But saying so, he also probably couldn’t see through a true genius as so many citizens misjudge among merely commonplace people and was aware of it. Just because of it genius must have a condition of devastate not to be evaluated by anybody. Or another to say, genius is already not genius, he or she was created after a distress or a situation in just distress not to be evaluated justly by anyone. He or she make an effort to tiding over that trouble. And so small part of those only could be a genius. Probably Schopenhauer wanted to say so.
2009年10月20日火曜日
Chapter 7, Value as to live on Performing Artists and Sports Persons
As my vision, on the standpoint about alive feeling the best existence is performing artists.
Surely on the meaning of activity with movement, alive feeling would be realized on the sports. But as far as concerned sports, a death of a sports person could be defined only as retirement of incumbent position. A death news after retirement is merely usual person’s death.
But performing artists including musicians, vaudevillians, Rakugo artists, comedians, dancers have no retirement since their true death. According to the fact a vacant feeling of us when they are dead is so deeper than the time of death of sports person. Sports enthusiasm is also not in the aspect of true life of human-beings, in the physically moving beauty in value sense. Those belong not to spiritual standard but to body standard. Of course games selves all have mental character. But needed condition on them is to win mentally not to lose. Namely to make their body cyborg is the last target in the beauty of sports esthetics. Therefore they would be evaluated only when they overcome their trouble in the games.
But for performing artist artistic style, patterns, characteristics of entertainment playing, all of them are the thing to overcome mental trouble in their lives. Originally artistic things including traditional art performance or makings are the thing couldn’t evaluated as overcoming pose of their lives. Because not to be able to overcome in their lives is also an expression.
At this meaning Igo games or Japanese style chess or chess is alike to sports. Namely games of win or lose is needed by the condition we do in overcoming spiritual aspect also technics to get around keeping up with a reason as they have usually. But for all of performing artists like literature persons or artist the technics are the expression about trouble. It is different from the overcome effects as sports persons try in keeping their health.
Just because of it, inversely sports have no decadence. Sports persons are all needed a ideal usual persons usually have. Sick superior sports persons don’t exist. Of course the player to participate in the games despite of being sick, but that action is only evaluated as overcoming efforts. It is different from performing artists receive life-self as usual and expression of them. But this inverse position each different side is as the fact could be proved as that the world can make itself with a co-existence of each different ideals as so many people can admit. It is a miracle of value self, isn’t it?
Of course the people with an admission of concern only to performing art can exist. Inversely the people of concern only to sports can exist. But even they probably don’t think that genre they have no concern will disappear in the future(Of course some people think so can exist).
Surely on the meaning of activity with movement, alive feeling would be realized on the sports. But as far as concerned sports, a death of a sports person could be defined only as retirement of incumbent position. A death news after retirement is merely usual person’s death.
But performing artists including musicians, vaudevillians, Rakugo artists, comedians, dancers have no retirement since their true death. According to the fact a vacant feeling of us when they are dead is so deeper than the time of death of sports person. Sports enthusiasm is also not in the aspect of true life of human-beings, in the physically moving beauty in value sense. Those belong not to spiritual standard but to body standard. Of course games selves all have mental character. But needed condition on them is to win mentally not to lose. Namely to make their body cyborg is the last target in the beauty of sports esthetics. Therefore they would be evaluated only when they overcome their trouble in the games.
But for performing artist artistic style, patterns, characteristics of entertainment playing, all of them are the thing to overcome mental trouble in their lives. Originally artistic things including traditional art performance or makings are the thing couldn’t evaluated as overcoming pose of their lives. Because not to be able to overcome in their lives is also an expression.
At this meaning Igo games or Japanese style chess or chess is alike to sports. Namely games of win or lose is needed by the condition we do in overcoming spiritual aspect also technics to get around keeping up with a reason as they have usually. But for all of performing artists like literature persons or artist the technics are the expression about trouble. It is different from the overcome effects as sports persons try in keeping their health.
Just because of it, inversely sports have no decadence. Sports persons are all needed a ideal usual persons usually have. Sick superior sports persons don’t exist. Of course the player to participate in the games despite of being sick, but that action is only evaluated as overcoming efforts. It is different from performing artists receive life-self as usual and expression of them. But this inverse position each different side is as the fact could be proved as that the world can make itself with a co-existence of each different ideals as so many people can admit. It is a miracle of value self, isn’t it?
Of course the people with an admission of concern only to performing art can exist. Inversely the people of concern only to sports can exist. But even they probably don’t think that genre they have no concern will disappear in the future(Of course some people think so can exist).
2009年10月16日金曜日
Chapter6, Public Value and Individual Value
We deny the public compulsion to us in individual happiness as feeling. Namely we support the thought that publicity has to be a matter as outside surroundings as the must, but inner world we hold is the different things and if we face the public value vision from outside force, we feel that is a fascism in our minds as history shows us.
But unexpectedly, even the matters we take as individual valuable thing for example inner mind aspect, we arise the truth we all hold as unexceptional experience to each other, from especial adolescence epoch in our lives. But in spite of all those facts, still we don't lose any inner world valuable insight, because all of those couldn't compare to others' things.
Impossible matters to compare to others' it includes a individual history. Namely if we have the same kind of profession or the history to get a job, if the member change, essence is the different. We cannot compare the two different persons' value through different experience. Therefore value originates all those individual experience is just the thing which we take a public value when that person is dead. In living state of that person, we cannot disturb that person's privacy, and he or she has a freedom of action. According to that reality, a trial to share an individual value would be realized only by other people but the people of acquaintance. In an closed human relationship, we don't share the public value, we contact each other with individual value as the each different one. That fact self has a value to each other. But a great person's achievement or thinking to life self has a public value to all of people usually making an exception which can exclude acquaintance of that great person.
That truth could be proved by the fact that closed relationship cannot convey the success to the business.
Value self has public significance even if it is an individual possession. It tries to approach an universality or generalization. Then on the contrary of those, if we face the situation that public value approaches to us in the state of power force, it can drive us to hold an impression that it is a fantasy. We doubt it so. Namely public value self can be a thing to choose in free emotion, but individual one cannot be a thing not to invaded by anyone. In that meaning, essentially in the society we have to keep a individual value as a mind rule. If there was a society without any mind rule like that, it would be a fascism nation. Namely the nation with only the public value hasn't any freedom of action or thinking. We can imagine so.
But unexpectedly, even the matters we take as individual valuable thing for example inner mind aspect, we arise the truth we all hold as unexceptional experience to each other, from especial adolescence epoch in our lives. But in spite of all those facts, still we don't lose any inner world valuable insight, because all of those couldn't compare to others' things.
Impossible matters to compare to others' it includes a individual history. Namely if we have the same kind of profession or the history to get a job, if the member change, essence is the different. We cannot compare the two different persons' value through different experience. Therefore value originates all those individual experience is just the thing which we take a public value when that person is dead. In living state of that person, we cannot disturb that person's privacy, and he or she has a freedom of action. According to that reality, a trial to share an individual value would be realized only by other people but the people of acquaintance. In an closed human relationship, we don't share the public value, we contact each other with individual value as the each different one. That fact self has a value to each other. But a great person's achievement or thinking to life self has a public value to all of people usually making an exception which can exclude acquaintance of that great person.
That truth could be proved by the fact that closed relationship cannot convey the success to the business.
Value self has public significance even if it is an individual possession. It tries to approach an universality or generalization. Then on the contrary of those, if we face the situation that public value approaches to us in the state of power force, it can drive us to hold an impression that it is a fantasy. We doubt it so. Namely public value self can be a thing to choose in free emotion, but individual one cannot be a thing not to invaded by anyone. In that meaning, essentially in the society we have to keep a individual value as a mind rule. If there was a society without any mind rule like that, it would be a fascism nation. Namely the nation with only the public value hasn't any freedom of action or thinking. We can imagine so.
2009年10月15日木曜日
Existent Value and Word Value7
Just because of those debates till now, value self couldn't judged only with a dualism between positive and negative, namely a simple dualism couldn't lead us a persuasive conclusion.
That fact couldn't disturb any logical verification's dualism. Namely ethics from now on has to be in the state we regard as the best method that we gaze at a neutral emotion or decision making at troublesome situation in the viewpoint not to taken only by dualism, as a lesson to regard value as not so simple one to divide two things.
If the fact that word value is so exceptional than existent value is right truth, probably it leads us to a conclusion that words help logical things, or to say that they relies on logic. But words originally indwells on our body sometimes disappear in the world as the death. And our emotion (making it with physiologic standpoint) or moralistic emotion contribute a cooperation and we emit it to outside toward the others as formation of ethic law. Then necessarily word value should be a mimic to existent value, it ought to be an ideal. Despite of it, making an emotion in the way to a conclusion a trivial matter to be spoiled, we regard word effect as a tool as the most important factor to communicate with others (like one phrase politics by recent past popular prime minister). Then than a faithfulness or true mind, a control technic to words , or for the time being semantic, logical, ethic persuasive beauty words have would be the thing we target on.
Probably a reason of even with the consciousness that word value belongs existent value, even we've held it from the past like that, we have a strong concern to word itself exists here. Paraphrasing it, the thing but words with a strong charm doesn't exist in the world.
Then ideal thought would be like next. Word is an object from which we discover the charm, but it fit for existent value, and praise existent one, and full of thankfulness to existent value. Namely word value is a mimic to existent value and also a symbol despite it been a mapping and a stimulus as necessity. But for realizing to say so, we must read that word self has to be the value as existent in the world independently.
That fact couldn't disturb any logical verification's dualism. Namely ethics from now on has to be in the state we regard as the best method that we gaze at a neutral emotion or decision making at troublesome situation in the viewpoint not to taken only by dualism, as a lesson to regard value as not so simple one to divide two things.
If the fact that word value is so exceptional than existent value is right truth, probably it leads us to a conclusion that words help logical things, or to say that they relies on logic. But words originally indwells on our body sometimes disappear in the world as the death. And our emotion (making it with physiologic standpoint) or moralistic emotion contribute a cooperation and we emit it to outside toward the others as formation of ethic law. Then necessarily word value should be a mimic to existent value, it ought to be an ideal. Despite of it, making an emotion in the way to a conclusion a trivial matter to be spoiled, we regard word effect as a tool as the most important factor to communicate with others (like one phrase politics by recent past popular prime minister). Then than a faithfulness or true mind, a control technic to words , or for the time being semantic, logical, ethic persuasive beauty words have would be the thing we target on.
Probably a reason of even with the consciousness that word value belongs existent value, even we've held it from the past like that, we have a strong concern to word itself exists here. Paraphrasing it, the thing but words with a strong charm doesn't exist in the world.
Then ideal thought would be like next. Word is an object from which we discover the charm, but it fit for existent value, and praise existent one, and full of thankfulness to existent value. Namely word value is a mimic to existent value and also a symbol despite it been a mapping and a stimulus as necessity. But for realizing to say so, we must read that word self has to be the value as existent in the world independently.
2009年10月11日日曜日
Existent Value and Word Value6
Today I watch a TV program as a news show trough a NHK news that a food shop had gotten a profit 40 ％up because with a smell of curry in the shop, it's an illusion, virtual strategy, to consume commodities comfortably is also an important indicator of happy life as substantiality on semantics ( if we purchase something, the best thing is that its action is comfortable, it's truth).
Then if the movie with a content that good-looking heroes acts so vividly with a rich residence had a success, that means that we couldn't do act like heroes, and do live in that place, therefore a substitute emotion gives us a content, but it's not all. Probably to watch that scenes is too meaningful action as pleasance. Our Dopamine in our brains acting so energetically is a fact proved as a scientific reason. Surely a thought that virtual image like three dimensions or a mimic smell is harmful exists, but in our reality on physiology is the matter we need. At this vision, contemporary logics have a lack a vision with a sense of qualia, lead to semantics composed in our brain as neuro-sciense.
Namely that we are more favorite to our sons and daughters than others would also be a physiological reality and choose a choice to give a praise to other person with a suppression to a favor to family members would also be physiological one, as an evaluation( fair choice and unfair choice are the same as choice of fair revel). The logics in the past cognizes a negative matters as falsehood. But to be dare to choose a disqualification to a superior masterpiece has a meaning as true mind with an anticipation to next more superior masterpiece in judges. And the case that even with dissatisfaction to praised masterpiece but consensus to give a praise to him or her. Namely reluctant judge as positive criticism. But logics hadn't any method but dualism, then neutral judgment is not capable for it. Then judges was dare to choose a disqualification to his child with an agony in his minds, namely he got a choice of literature significance as public value. It's natural observation. But it's difference. He had a so serious trouble in his mind to be dare to choose other person but his child. He has a complicated emotion.
Then if the movie with a content that good-looking heroes acts so vividly with a rich residence had a success, that means that we couldn't do act like heroes, and do live in that place, therefore a substitute emotion gives us a content, but it's not all. Probably to watch that scenes is too meaningful action as pleasance. Our Dopamine in our brains acting so energetically is a fact proved as a scientific reason. Surely a thought that virtual image like three dimensions or a mimic smell is harmful exists, but in our reality on physiology is the matter we need. At this vision, contemporary logics have a lack a vision with a sense of qualia, lead to semantics composed in our brain as neuro-sciense.
Namely that we are more favorite to our sons and daughters than others would also be a physiological reality and choose a choice to give a praise to other person with a suppression to a favor to family members would also be physiological one, as an evaluation( fair choice and unfair choice are the same as choice of fair revel). The logics in the past cognizes a negative matters as falsehood. But to be dare to choose a disqualification to a superior masterpiece has a meaning as true mind with an anticipation to next more superior masterpiece in judges. And the case that even with dissatisfaction to praised masterpiece but consensus to give a praise to him or her. Namely reluctant judge as positive criticism. But logics hadn't any method but dualism, then neutral judgment is not capable for it. Then judges was dare to choose a disqualification to his child with an agony in his minds, namely he got a choice of literature significance as public value. It's natural observation. But it's difference. He had a so serious trouble in his mind to be dare to choose other person but his child. He has a complicated emotion.
2009年10月9日金曜日
Existent Value and Word Value5
This story symbolizes the discussion to lead us to a point that solipsism dualism debate self couldn't be acknowledged easily. A philosopher as a Japanese to say " I cannot love anybody but myself " lives here, but actually we see through that fact with neuro- science on brain research that his brain also ignites also to the person he hates. Namely truth character as logical standpoint and a function relies on physical reality have each different standpoint, haven't they?
For example the desks are the same to every each other. It could be applied to the meaning of that existence or the composed state condition as a solidity to keep them a stable condition not to be broken. But a difference exists among all desks to lead us to a feeling of a qualia with a shape of those, material sensation, is an object we should remember as an important factor to choose them to use or buy. We choose it to read on it so comfortably. Namely it is the same as the example of choosing comfortable car to drive or comfortable ballpoint pen to write a letter, if semantics world tells us it's enough to choose, but on the vision of working efficiency and hygiene of mentality, its choice ought to have a solid difference to each other. Then necessarily the principle of meaning=fairness belongs not only a logical meaning world but also real physiologic world to read as an evaluation for us. Namely a meaning world fair in logical cognition could be deviated the standard route, completely unfair difference exist among the desks to do us to use those a different mental effect in each cases.
For example the desks are the same to every each other. It could be applied to the meaning of that existence or the composed state condition as a solidity to keep them a stable condition not to be broken. But a difference exists among all desks to lead us to a feeling of a qualia with a shape of those, material sensation, is an object we should remember as an important factor to choose them to use or buy. We choose it to read on it so comfortably. Namely it is the same as the example of choosing comfortable car to drive or comfortable ballpoint pen to write a letter, if semantics world tells us it's enough to choose, but on the vision of working efficiency and hygiene of mentality, its choice ought to have a solid difference to each other. Then necessarily the principle of meaning=fairness belongs not only a logical meaning world but also real physiologic world to read as an evaluation for us. Namely a meaning world fair in logical cognition could be deviated the standard route, completely unfair difference exist among the desks to do us to use those a different mental effect in each cases.
2009年10月8日木曜日
Existent Value and Word Value4
We usually don’t doubt that we live in a meaning world. For example we are cognizant that a desk exists to write, read a book, if we look at it. It also is a proof that we recognize tha objects as a meaning. But we don’t recognize those at each another case not in semantics. Namely meaning root under our usual lives.
But on the other hand, we discriminate the cases on a choice to the affection of others, for example family members or closed friends, just friends, namely in some priority as a difference between difference on indifference to all other people. Then we judge an action when we face emergency in the events concerned our family or closed relation. We easily take an attitude to loved ones as so deep decision to do anything as the best. Therefore we can decide to wish self son if he makes an effort to getting the literature prize, even if he has not so been talented in self jugment. He or she wishes only his or her son’s success. This is love.
But if that example is applicable to our fair judgment, his or her wish is merely a favor to his or her son, it’s not the literature truth judgment. (meaning＝fair＜includes unfair＞)
But meaning essentially is ought to be different to love favor. Then let’s think of meaning with the vision of fairness. And meaning is, if the son is writing a novel and his father is a judge of literature prize, but a judge father of the son thinks that other prize candidate’s woman is superior than his son, if he loves to choose support his son’s work, he should support her work, if he think her masterpiece is the one to support as the principle as the writer. Its decision is reasonable choice.
But on the other hand a function by mirror neuron is proved in scientific world, it reads an other’s mind as his or her emotion with self brain, the neuron group to read those activates, when other person shows some emotion or action in front of the owner with this brain part equal to the brain part activates in an owner person acts as the same to that observed person.Then this neuron surely ignites especially strongly to loved ones (for example sons or daughters), of course also to others all. Of course its ignition probably is strong in the case of loved ones. But human-beings instinctively makes their brain to ignite any cases in front of the emotion or action of others all in physically.
But on the other hand, we discriminate the cases on a choice to the affection of others, for example family members or closed friends, just friends, namely in some priority as a difference between difference on indifference to all other people. Then we judge an action when we face emergency in the events concerned our family or closed relation. We easily take an attitude to loved ones as so deep decision to do anything as the best. Therefore we can decide to wish self son if he makes an effort to getting the literature prize, even if he has not so been talented in self jugment. He or she wishes only his or her son’s success. This is love.
But if that example is applicable to our fair judgment, his or her wish is merely a favor to his or her son, it’s not the literature truth judgment. (meaning＝fair＜includes unfair＞)
But meaning essentially is ought to be different to love favor. Then let’s think of meaning with the vision of fairness. And meaning is, if the son is writing a novel and his father is a judge of literature prize, but a judge father of the son thinks that other prize candidate’s woman is superior than his son, if he loves to choose support his son’s work, he should support her work, if he think her masterpiece is the one to support as the principle as the writer. Its decision is reasonable choice.
But on the other hand a function by mirror neuron is proved in scientific world, it reads an other’s mind as his or her emotion with self brain, the neuron group to read those activates, when other person shows some emotion or action in front of the owner with this brain part equal to the brain part activates in an owner person acts as the same to that observed person.Then this neuron surely ignites especially strongly to loved ones (for example sons or daughters), of course also to others all. Of course its ignition probably is strong in the case of loved ones. But human-beings instinctively makes their brain to ignite any cases in front of the emotion or action of others all in physically.
2009年10月7日水曜日
Existent Value and Word Value3
What made it?
It probably would originate that words aren't existent value, nor value of entity, are the meaning themselves. At the matter of fact if we dare to recognize, the words have so many blanc. Those are the different to the movements perfectly. If we use the meaning with not so beautiful voice, that trial doesn't do any effect to the meaning itself. Nor the bad shape script state so. Namely we regard a signification to the meaning in words as the indispensable matter on the truth with meaning beauty equal to the existent beauty.
Those facts prove the exceptional characteristics comparatively to the existent value.
It probably would originate that words aren't existent value, nor value of entity, are the meaning themselves. At the matter of fact if we dare to recognize, the words have so many blanc. Those are the different to the movements perfectly. If we use the meaning with not so beautiful voice, that trial doesn't do any effect to the meaning itself. Nor the bad shape script state so. Namely we regard a signification to the meaning in words as the indispensable matter on the truth with meaning beauty equal to the existent beauty.
Those facts prove the exceptional characteristics comparatively to the existent value.
2009年10月5日月曜日
Existent Value and Word Value2
But when we think of word value, we are apt to take a jugment along with the present situation, a properness of jugment, we can say so especially with a respect to a technical realization. Namely on the contrary, as if we hold a carefulness to word said to others, others often judge its saying not so appropriate in that situation as TPO. Then word value isn't a inner motivation. Rather it could be judged with effective word properness. In that meaning we need an ideal toward a choice of a person to do something for example act as a politician in front of audience as speech act, to move them or a group to belong to. We need an ideal performance to them. On the other hand as concerned with action category, we need of course a technic of action, but unexpectedly rather after a long period we regard an attitude ignoring a speedy or techical or esthetical image as a tiny element to decide a value of action. Namely we respect a fact to act, do not respect a technic even if at the first time its action could get any good reputation.
It shows a truth except a sport's technic, usual our action could be evaluated by a standard along with a realization as a fact, or a meaning explanation or an effect by that action (Even sports rely on a restless effort or exercise and beauty of action is merely an effect of those).
But words don't stand upon that standard, then if words selves were not charming to persuade anyone, we don't evaluate those words. We need a standard to judge words with an esthetic beauty to read, and we regard the words without beauty as meaningless. It's ordinal jugment for us. We regard the meaning of words as so important.
It shows a truth except a sport's technic, usual our action could be evaluated by a standard along with a realization as a fact, or a meaning explanation or an effect by that action (Even sports rely on a restless effort or exercise and beauty of action is merely an effect of those).
But words don't stand upon that standard, then if words selves were not charming to persuade anyone, we don't evaluate those words. We need a standard to judge words with an esthetic beauty to read, and we regard the words without beauty as meaningless. It's ordinal jugment for us. We regard the meaning of words as so important.
2009年10月2日金曜日
Chapter5,Existent Value and Word Value
We judge the performance by the particular person as in the revel of semantics or moralistic aspect whether it's good or not, rather than the smoothness of an action or technic of it. Despite of it, playing tennis or golf selves surely those are valuable not only it but also the technics of those is so important. And also the instruments playing in music, the painting brush techinic is too. But at least as concerned with usual performance of ourselves, if it is applicable to the politicians, at the same time of the fairness, businesslike disposal to every scenes of political action, and technics of proceedings of debate or anything. In spite of the recent days political scenes, the charm of personality to cut a figure in front of the media with an effect to get percentage of advocacy is so important, because the lack of the charm is fatal to the effect of the election. Therefore the politics has a contradiction. But also at least an affection between husband and wife, expression of love consists not in a technic, but in honesty, technic is a trivial affix. Therefore only it to be outstanding is not so welcome fact for us, we think so morally.
登録:
コメント (Atom)
