There’re so assorted of thinkers, and there’re many ones who admit its assorted thoughts and also many ones who can’t admit assortment in society.
Namely there’re ones who think self thinking relative and can say so, otherwise there’re ones who can’t admit former thinking, don’t think it is steady belief, then if someone has a steady thought or idea, it must be absolute, nothing is right but self opinion and it should be..
But it can be said that those of ideas always can be distributed according to outside situation or demand from society at any moments from the world.
Paraphrasing it, there’s a moment to think that despite of the belief that self opinion is right, righter or not wrong opinion but self it must exist, or at the same time of it, reversely there’s the moment to think that it mustn’t be so, self opinion is the best not permitting any other opinions. Latter is in the cases that we perform particular things by ourselves or act by ourselves refraining from any relative judgments.
But if we try to say something of orthodox view, any individuals hold each different it,and also we needn’t confess anything to anyone as private ideas or tendency or taste individuals each hold which are the parts we feel shame, then debating it isn’t just logical but also so troublesome, it’s so difficult.
One of so hard things is sexual problem. For instance gay or lesbian is not wrong at least for me. At the matter of fact it’s not the thing we must judge that if someone realizes nothing of it, absolutely we deny as the matter we must appraise, at the same time of it isn’t the thing we must deny if we witness some case in question according to the Bible instruction as the biggest moralistic evil, I think so.
To me shame bares an idea that the Bible or explanation to it, ethnic unity, nation’s order is the most important thing more than any individual happiness as they are noble or sublime but homosexual, lesbianism, gay or anything like those is dirty. Shame is always hidden in claim of justice.
To be related with me, homosexual is only an experience that I sometimes hold adoration to ideal same sex persons for example young days of the Beatles or anything like that as the entity of idol in my close friendship. Thereby I hold no experience to contact in physical relationship in sex to same sex persons and hold no experience to hope it in mind. But I have an opinion that holding love emotion to same sex persons is wrong, and I haven’t an idea that it’s good to hold it in mind but really experiencing physical sex intercourse is wrong. Much less I haven’t an idea hold adoration to real sex experience to same sex persons is sinful.
Namely I have an idea that any favoritism in sex taste are permitted in any individual persons freely in any hope to any actions or minds. Then it’s only clear thing to say,
I don’t think they’re dirtier things more than ethnic unity or nation’s order. Of course ethnic unity or nation’s order are also the things not to be treated easily, but at the same time of it I don’t think that only those are the sublime or noble things. Therefore I have a antipathy to actions to suppress or discriminate any those ideas, I don’t think those action is right. Even if I recognize the existence as a person who has no experience in life, as far as concerned as not believing it’s noble, it’s also a free choice in anyone, at the same time of it an idea which can’t believe a person who does so is wrong to me.
Namely I think we should respect any choice of sex life, I have a strong concern to sex matters, but its concern isn’t beyond any other concerns to me, but at the same time of it it’s important things as curiosity or concern to me. Even any sexual phantasm is also permitted as far as concerned not to disturb any other persons.
And I hate the person who regard anyone deviating sexual common sense as deviate as outcast in society and regard anyone doing more sublime things but former them, I think that the persons who think that applause the winning of war obeying the order of nation and discriminate the persons who deviate self common sense (What is the common sense?) is heavily mental diseased.
Nymphomaniac or satyriasis are the existence with little sin as harm to the society as long as not driving their lives into the ruin.
Surely pursue of extremely high revel pleasuring of sex in social life isn’t the things not to say it’s risky. But as long as not driving our lives into pain in the neck in social life all of those can be allowed, I think so. And also tasteful person of sex can be allowed even in their much desire to do sex as long as not regretting themselves, all of those judgment should be trust to any individuality. Namely if an individual judge that all of extraordinary sex pursue should be refrain from doing, he or she should do so, but its belief shouldn’t be applied to any other persons in force and he or she also shouldn’t be forced so. It’s right opinion, I believe.
I at the matter of fact imagine any abnormal matters of sex but at the same time of it I cannot realize every imagination, but if there’s someone to realize any imagination about sex, as long as not to be regret or get to be unhappy for realizing anything he or she want, its stance also can be permitted, I think.
I hold an opinion that sexual phantasm can bear even fecund imagination.
Ten thousands and a thousand’s whip by Guillaume Apollinaire is excellent novel which is pornographic content. A world drawn in it is subtle content as it can be or it cannot be. Or the reason that I feel so may be caused from that my taste of sex isn’t the type to pursue high revel sensuality as pleasure.
Or Hitoshi Nagai says in Manga < cartoon> does philosophy, it’s mysterious that sexual intercourse is the thing is shameful action to be seen by some other persons but eating isn’t so, Yoshimichi Nakajima said in an article, it’s mysterious that in the case to be asked what is the thing you want now, we can’t say “ I want to have a sexual intercourse now, it’s natural question we are apt to hold usually in daily life as honest emotion.
Namely I have a steady opinion that it’s okay to hold each different opinion which is related to sex thing as far as concerned to be interested in or not. It belongs to individual shame, even if someone feel no shame, it’s individual problem not to be careful.
We often judge that married persons don’t want to tell anything of sexual matters but even if there’s someone as married but at the same time of it, despite of it more strong desire or concern to sexual matters is owned by him or her, it can be allowed as innocent I think. Namely as long as not to be regret in the case of its situation nor to force anyone as he or she want to do, crave isn’t sinful, even concern to abnormal sexual things isn’t sinful, I think. Namely it must be in category of shame is also a stereotype we’re apt to hold in mind, I think.
Then not to cork any emotion to want to do abnormal sex and perform it, if each partner has a consensus to it, it’s okay I think. No one can force anyone who has different value vision with rigid stoic law. It’s the same sin that persons with no interest to sexual thing force persons with strong interest not to do so and inversely persons with strong interest of sex force persons with no interest of it to do so, we can say.
2011年5月1日日曜日
登録:
コメントの投稿 (Atom)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿