All of judgment of us what is abnormal, what is normal is left to any individual persons, general theorem doesn’t exist. Namely factor to decide a properness to an action is reliable to a situation, its character of situation is assorted in any individual persons’ subject.
But at a part, we can’t judge it’s truth but it’s like truth that in the meaning we jump into the pool, at judging a goodness of an action, obviously we need a closeness to close friends each other can permit the same action, in the process to be close each other, any actions or sayings mustn’t be apparent, paraphrasing it, judgment to what timing to confess any shameful things to close friend or a mind concept not to need to confess or judgment if we confess shameful matter to him or her, he or she is so close friend then it’s not so trouble or not is reliable to each individual characters. Namely there’s difference in shameful object self or contents’ difference.
In companies to hold the same taste in sex, each other can’t be so shy in the point of sexual taste. But it can be so after getting to be close each other. Of course it can be applied to any other matters but sex. General morals, political opinions, vision of human relation, or judgment to individual character too.
Namely in matters about anything, we are apt not to tell true mind if we can’t get the true mind of communication partners in thinking, what part is near, what part is apart. Then if we individually have abnormal taste in sex, having an idea not to tell anyone is dependent to another idea that we want to be seen by other people as normal not abnormal.
But that kind of anxiety can be applied in anything but sex. For example contents to get study proposition, ability, faculty is the things to do any students a peer pressure, with anxious idea that I have a delay or gap among any other students. They are set toward other persons.
But if getting to be close each other is getting rid of those anxiety, individual cognition in judgment to hold ruler measuring what domain of contents or timing to confess shameful matters to friends makes a intentional posture toward any other persons except myself at each moments to face.
And I infer that we almost judge the best way to keep company with somebody not to confess everything rapidly each other. Why do we do so?
The reason to do so is that we have shame in evading rapid confession to get a gradation to reach the goal to know each other different things to be interested in.
Namely not to hasten to do so is the consensus to acknowledge each different hobby or interest. At the matter of fact we each hold different standard what to confess from the first time to meet, or to ask. Then to ask each other what each ones have each different standard to ask is the care to each other not to make unpleasant other one.
Then we can say that we shouldn’t say “let’s drink together”, or” are you interested in pornography”, or but at a special case we should do so frankly with a brave as its way has merit.
The possession of the care to know the communication partner can be close to each other is equal to admit each other a shameful existence. Or we have the different standard to think what question is the thing to be frowned at asking by each other probably according to the different process to be raised. Namely what thing is shameful or not can’t be generalized among any persons.
Then inversely it’s individually different to judge ~is what, to be ~is necessary, to be ~ is common sense, its judgment can’t be generalized, its truth’s rampancy in a good meaning in society is my ideal state in society as my view to judge individual value vision in a partner to converse with, despite of knowing completely different value vision in its person, as the person to understand mutually. Then I get happiness when I discover the same vision in a conversation partners.
It’s a little bit different from compatible live and let live strategy in a theory that human-beings are the evil entity. It’s simply a mutual verification or confirmation not to intervene mutual things to do individually.
Compatible strategy in to live and let live is business intention, and not a different revel judgment to have individual intimacy.
But it’s so general to say that we can be harmed when we have a posture to evade any mentions to the person we face or meet about something we feel danger as the subject in conversation. And its content to evade or refrain from talking is unexpectedly often the matter we should talk, more than the matter we shouldn’t talk in distorted, biased posture we make. But for avoiding its demerit, we might talk mutually what we shouldn’t talk so deeper or what we should talk frankly more than we’ve done. It’s only way to take advantage of our conversation to know the stance or vision each other.
Paraphrasing it, with a way to quest core problem daring to be in early time after meeting someone with a trust to the conversation partner, verifying each other mutual stance to mention frankly or not to mention so frankly refraining from talking too much about some problems is the best way to escaping from mutual misunderstandings or unneeded friction. Namely if we get to know mutual common field we each hold in mind as the own position, we can at least elude unexpected disillusion or dissatisfaction, discontent. Namely in a vision that we can see that rapid confirmation to each other of fundamental stance in mind can joint together a not meaningless sending of messages, seeking after is the sole effect for us in conversation, it’s only the best care for each other in communication, we can say.
Therefore identity of shame isn’t what to be confessed, with an action to verify mutual individual strategy in mind as we can get to know we hold in mind mutually, reversely we can say that what we can be close together is equal to verify objects to feel shame or contents to be with shame in deep mind as we have secretly. Namely intimacy can be composed in judgment to what to be seen or what to be unseen by a conversation partner for each other.
Then seeing in early time after meeting together that we should see both what to be seen and what to be unseen to each differently in mind can be said an implicit rule for each other.
2011年5月1日日曜日
Chapter31 Shame about sex and Value
There’re so assorted of thinkers, and there’re many ones who admit its assorted thoughts and also many ones who can’t admit assortment in society.
Namely there’re ones who think self thinking relative and can say so, otherwise there’re ones who can’t admit former thinking, don’t think it is steady belief, then if someone has a steady thought or idea, it must be absolute, nothing is right but self opinion and it should be..
But it can be said that those of ideas always can be distributed according to outside situation or demand from society at any moments from the world.
Paraphrasing it, there’s a moment to think that despite of the belief that self opinion is right, righter or not wrong opinion but self it must exist, or at the same time of it, reversely there’s the moment to think that it mustn’t be so, self opinion is the best not permitting any other opinions. Latter is in the cases that we perform particular things by ourselves or act by ourselves refraining from any relative judgments.
But if we try to say something of orthodox view, any individuals hold each different it,and also we needn’t confess anything to anyone as private ideas or tendency or taste individuals each hold which are the parts we feel shame, then debating it isn’t just logical but also so troublesome, it’s so difficult.
One of so hard things is sexual problem. For instance gay or lesbian is not wrong at least for me. At the matter of fact it’s not the thing we must judge that if someone realizes nothing of it, absolutely we deny as the matter we must appraise, at the same time of it isn’t the thing we must deny if we witness some case in question according to the Bible instruction as the biggest moralistic evil, I think so.
To me shame bares an idea that the Bible or explanation to it, ethnic unity, nation’s order is the most important thing more than any individual happiness as they are noble or sublime but homosexual, lesbianism, gay or anything like those is dirty. Shame is always hidden in claim of justice.
To be related with me, homosexual is only an experience that I sometimes hold adoration to ideal same sex persons for example young days of the Beatles or anything like that as the entity of idol in my close friendship. Thereby I hold no experience to contact in physical relationship in sex to same sex persons and hold no experience to hope it in mind. But I have an opinion that holding love emotion to same sex persons is wrong, and I haven’t an idea that it’s good to hold it in mind but really experiencing physical sex intercourse is wrong. Much less I haven’t an idea hold adoration to real sex experience to same sex persons is sinful.
Namely I have an idea that any favoritism in sex taste are permitted in any individual persons freely in any hope to any actions or minds. Then it’s only clear thing to say,
I don’t think they’re dirtier things more than ethnic unity or nation’s order. Of course ethnic unity or nation’s order are also the things not to be treated easily, but at the same time of it I don’t think that only those are the sublime or noble things. Therefore I have a antipathy to actions to suppress or discriminate any those ideas, I don’t think those action is right. Even if I recognize the existence as a person who has no experience in life, as far as concerned as not believing it’s noble, it’s also a free choice in anyone, at the same time of it an idea which can’t believe a person who does so is wrong to me.
Namely I think we should respect any choice of sex life, I have a strong concern to sex matters, but its concern isn’t beyond any other concerns to me, but at the same time of it it’s important things as curiosity or concern to me. Even any sexual phantasm is also permitted as far as concerned not to disturb any other persons.
And I hate the person who regard anyone deviating sexual common sense as deviate as outcast in society and regard anyone doing more sublime things but former them, I think that the persons who think that applause the winning of war obeying the order of nation and discriminate the persons who deviate self common sense (What is the common sense?) is heavily mental diseased.
Nymphomaniac or satyriasis are the existence with little sin as harm to the society as long as not driving their lives into the ruin.
Surely pursue of extremely high revel pleasuring of sex in social life isn’t the things not to say it’s risky. But as long as not driving our lives into pain in the neck in social life all of those can be allowed, I think so. And also tasteful person of sex can be allowed even in their much desire to do sex as long as not regretting themselves, all of those judgment should be trust to any individuality. Namely if an individual judge that all of extraordinary sex pursue should be refrain from doing, he or she should do so, but its belief shouldn’t be applied to any other persons in force and he or she also shouldn’t be forced so. It’s right opinion, I believe.
I at the matter of fact imagine any abnormal matters of sex but at the same time of it I cannot realize every imagination, but if there’s someone to realize any imagination about sex, as long as not to be regret or get to be unhappy for realizing anything he or she want, its stance also can be permitted, I think.
I hold an opinion that sexual phantasm can bear even fecund imagination.
Ten thousands and a thousand’s whip by Guillaume Apollinaire is excellent novel which is pornographic content. A world drawn in it is subtle content as it can be or it cannot be. Or the reason that I feel so may be caused from that my taste of sex isn’t the type to pursue high revel sensuality as pleasure.
Or Hitoshi Nagai says in Manga < cartoon> does philosophy, it’s mysterious that sexual intercourse is the thing is shameful action to be seen by some other persons but eating isn’t so, Yoshimichi Nakajima said in an article, it’s mysterious that in the case to be asked what is the thing you want now, we can’t say “ I want to have a sexual intercourse now, it’s natural question we are apt to hold usually in daily life as honest emotion.
Namely I have a steady opinion that it’s okay to hold each different opinion which is related to sex thing as far as concerned to be interested in or not. It belongs to individual shame, even if someone feel no shame, it’s individual problem not to be careful.
We often judge that married persons don’t want to tell anything of sexual matters but even if there’s someone as married but at the same time of it, despite of it more strong desire or concern to sexual matters is owned by him or her, it can be allowed as innocent I think. Namely as long as not to be regret in the case of its situation nor to force anyone as he or she want to do, crave isn’t sinful, even concern to abnormal sexual things isn’t sinful, I think. Namely it must be in category of shame is also a stereotype we’re apt to hold in mind, I think.
Then not to cork any emotion to want to do abnormal sex and perform it, if each partner has a consensus to it, it’s okay I think. No one can force anyone who has different value vision with rigid stoic law. It’s the same sin that persons with no interest to sexual thing force persons with strong interest not to do so and inversely persons with strong interest of sex force persons with no interest of it to do so, we can say.
Namely there’re ones who think self thinking relative and can say so, otherwise there’re ones who can’t admit former thinking, don’t think it is steady belief, then if someone has a steady thought or idea, it must be absolute, nothing is right but self opinion and it should be..
But it can be said that those of ideas always can be distributed according to outside situation or demand from society at any moments from the world.
Paraphrasing it, there’s a moment to think that despite of the belief that self opinion is right, righter or not wrong opinion but self it must exist, or at the same time of it, reversely there’s the moment to think that it mustn’t be so, self opinion is the best not permitting any other opinions. Latter is in the cases that we perform particular things by ourselves or act by ourselves refraining from any relative judgments.
But if we try to say something of orthodox view, any individuals hold each different it,and also we needn’t confess anything to anyone as private ideas or tendency or taste individuals each hold which are the parts we feel shame, then debating it isn’t just logical but also so troublesome, it’s so difficult.
One of so hard things is sexual problem. For instance gay or lesbian is not wrong at least for me. At the matter of fact it’s not the thing we must judge that if someone realizes nothing of it, absolutely we deny as the matter we must appraise, at the same time of it isn’t the thing we must deny if we witness some case in question according to the Bible instruction as the biggest moralistic evil, I think so.
To me shame bares an idea that the Bible or explanation to it, ethnic unity, nation’s order is the most important thing more than any individual happiness as they are noble or sublime but homosexual, lesbianism, gay or anything like those is dirty. Shame is always hidden in claim of justice.
To be related with me, homosexual is only an experience that I sometimes hold adoration to ideal same sex persons for example young days of the Beatles or anything like that as the entity of idol in my close friendship. Thereby I hold no experience to contact in physical relationship in sex to same sex persons and hold no experience to hope it in mind. But I have an opinion that holding love emotion to same sex persons is wrong, and I haven’t an idea that it’s good to hold it in mind but really experiencing physical sex intercourse is wrong. Much less I haven’t an idea hold adoration to real sex experience to same sex persons is sinful.
Namely I have an idea that any favoritism in sex taste are permitted in any individual persons freely in any hope to any actions or minds. Then it’s only clear thing to say,
I don’t think they’re dirtier things more than ethnic unity or nation’s order. Of course ethnic unity or nation’s order are also the things not to be treated easily, but at the same time of it I don’t think that only those are the sublime or noble things. Therefore I have a antipathy to actions to suppress or discriminate any those ideas, I don’t think those action is right. Even if I recognize the existence as a person who has no experience in life, as far as concerned as not believing it’s noble, it’s also a free choice in anyone, at the same time of it an idea which can’t believe a person who does so is wrong to me.
Namely I think we should respect any choice of sex life, I have a strong concern to sex matters, but its concern isn’t beyond any other concerns to me, but at the same time of it it’s important things as curiosity or concern to me. Even any sexual phantasm is also permitted as far as concerned not to disturb any other persons.
And I hate the person who regard anyone deviating sexual common sense as deviate as outcast in society and regard anyone doing more sublime things but former them, I think that the persons who think that applause the winning of war obeying the order of nation and discriminate the persons who deviate self common sense (What is the common sense?) is heavily mental diseased.
Nymphomaniac or satyriasis are the existence with little sin as harm to the society as long as not driving their lives into the ruin.
Surely pursue of extremely high revel pleasuring of sex in social life isn’t the things not to say it’s risky. But as long as not driving our lives into pain in the neck in social life all of those can be allowed, I think so. And also tasteful person of sex can be allowed even in their much desire to do sex as long as not regretting themselves, all of those judgment should be trust to any individuality. Namely if an individual judge that all of extraordinary sex pursue should be refrain from doing, he or she should do so, but its belief shouldn’t be applied to any other persons in force and he or she also shouldn’t be forced so. It’s right opinion, I believe.
I at the matter of fact imagine any abnormal matters of sex but at the same time of it I cannot realize every imagination, but if there’s someone to realize any imagination about sex, as long as not to be regret or get to be unhappy for realizing anything he or she want, its stance also can be permitted, I think.
I hold an opinion that sexual phantasm can bear even fecund imagination.
Ten thousands and a thousand’s whip by Guillaume Apollinaire is excellent novel which is pornographic content. A world drawn in it is subtle content as it can be or it cannot be. Or the reason that I feel so may be caused from that my taste of sex isn’t the type to pursue high revel sensuality as pleasure.
Or Hitoshi Nagai says in Manga < cartoon> does philosophy, it’s mysterious that sexual intercourse is the thing is shameful action to be seen by some other persons but eating isn’t so, Yoshimichi Nakajima said in an article, it’s mysterious that in the case to be asked what is the thing you want now, we can’t say “ I want to have a sexual intercourse now, it’s natural question we are apt to hold usually in daily life as honest emotion.
Namely I have a steady opinion that it’s okay to hold each different opinion which is related to sex thing as far as concerned to be interested in or not. It belongs to individual shame, even if someone feel no shame, it’s individual problem not to be careful.
We often judge that married persons don’t want to tell anything of sexual matters but even if there’s someone as married but at the same time of it, despite of it more strong desire or concern to sexual matters is owned by him or her, it can be allowed as innocent I think. Namely as long as not to be regret in the case of its situation nor to force anyone as he or she want to do, crave isn’t sinful, even concern to abnormal sexual things isn’t sinful, I think. Namely it must be in category of shame is also a stereotype we’re apt to hold in mind, I think.
Then not to cork any emotion to want to do abnormal sex and perform it, if each partner has a consensus to it, it’s okay I think. No one can force anyone who has different value vision with rigid stoic law. It’s the same sin that persons with no interest to sexual thing force persons with strong interest not to do so and inversely persons with strong interest of sex force persons with no interest of it to do so, we can say.
登録:
コメント (Atom)
