Chapter28 Truth, Desire, Getting to be close part3

Namely why does I differ others is the question not to solve, as it is eternal quest. Then trial to answer with one words is falsehood. It is like naming something world, naming action self is great detachment, we see so. And abandoning ability equal to saying ability to say I now abandon something belongs to only I. Therefore I paraphrase Descartes description as I abandon something, I am.
At the matter of fact not abandoning to quest something, but we decide a repetition to quest in knowing that we can’t answer eternal quest with one words. Its decision is one of believing.
Namely we compose any communication in abandoning an answer to any question why does I differ others to keep up with sympathizing others’ mind, realizing each other. At the moment to do so, I can’t know all in any situations, aspects, by myself, and I know I can’t realize mutual understanding’s effect, also I know I abandon any trials to accomplish mutual understanding with others as I only know. We can’t share this feeing each other.
But this incapability to share this feeling is devised in seeing that others but myself are the same to myself, and decide to believe so.
At the matter of fact deciding self is what we regard it as of truth, ideal. Of course we do so unconsciously. And then deciding so , namely decision self is devised in as it is, as we name something world as the same mechanism, and also the same of getting to be close. At the matter of fact it is absolutely as I abandon, as I am. And particular essence of abandoning self is incapable to explain. If we try to accomplish explaining it, as there’s no perfection without fault, it’s impossible. But we compromise anything with others we want to be close each other.
Then we can offer a diagram, deciding something=decision=believing=getting to be close each other=abandoning perfection as there’s no perfect world=naming( doing language action, participating in doing something)
Then at the matter of fact decision to do language action is Knowing language’s powerlessness, therefore it shows that we get to be aware of that we can’t express anything but words, language, it is equal to recognize mutual abandoning.
But we can see that it is equal to decide the fact we realize mutually, we can’t answer Hitoshi Nagai’s proposition. Namely as Descartes didn’t answer or solve his proposition doing only being ready for a starting point, also we can reach the solution as generalization to say as I abandon something, I am. However just because of it, we decide the fact that we accomplish mutually to realize we are in the same feeling, trying to believe we see each other.
But I think that only solution to Hitoshi Nagai’s proposition is believing, as equal to abandoning, decision mind. Because if it isn’t so, probably Professor Hitoshi Nagai knows that we can’t solve any proposition if it isn’t eternally. At the matter of fact this quest who is I is equal to quest to who are the others, we can give us the conclusion. It’s tautology at one meaning. That is like as truth and desire don’t separate each other, getting to be close each other is equal to keeping distance to any other persons except close companies.